Department of Anesthesiology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, 10 ChangjiangZhilu, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Department of Maxillofacial and Head and Neck Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Sci Rep. 2021 May 5;11(1):9605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88798-0.
The objective of this study was to propose a new method for facilitating needle-beam alignment ultrasound-guided in-plane catheterization of the subclavian vein (SCV). Three hundred patients were recruited, and ultrasound examination of the SCV was performed. Then, the patients were divided into two groups and SCV catheterization was performed: ultrasound-guided catheterization with the aiming method (group A) and ultrasound-guided catheterization with needle guide (group NG). The success rate, insertion time, number of skin breaks, number of needle redirections, needle visibility and rate of mechanical complications were documented and compared for each procedure. To depict the optimum long-axis view of the SCV, there was a 30° ± 7.3° angle (rotation) between the long axis of the ultrasound probe and the clavicle, while there was a 39° ± 7.4° angle (tilt) between the ultrasound beam plane and the right chest wall. The aiming method was associated with fewer skin breaks [(mean (IQR): 1 (1-1) times vs 1 (1-2) times, P = 0.009], a shorter time to cannulation [(mean (IQR): 39 (32-48.5) s vs 48 (44-54.8) s, P = 0.000] and more needle redirections [(mean (IQR): 0 (0-1) vs 0 (0-0), P = 0.000]. There were no differences between group A and group NG in the overall success rate, first puncture success rate, needle visibility or mechanical complication rate. In conclusion, during ultrasound-guided in-plane catheterization of the SCV, the aiming method provides comparable needle-beam alignment with a lower cannulation time than the needle guide technique.
本研究旨在提出一种新的方法,以促进超声引导下锁骨下静脉(SCV)平面内导管插入术的针束对准。招募了 300 名患者,并对 SCV 进行了超声检查。然后,将患者分为两组并进行 SCV 导管插入术:超声引导下的瞄准方法组(A 组)和超声引导下的针引导组(NG 组)。记录并比较了两种方法的成功率、插入时间、皮肤穿刺次数、针重新定向次数、针可视性和机械并发症发生率。为了描绘 SCV 的最佳长轴视图,超声探头的长轴与锁骨之间有 30°±7.3°的角度(旋转),而超声束平面与右胸壁之间有 39°±7.4°的角度(倾斜)。瞄准方法与较少的皮肤穿刺次数相关[(均数(IQR):1(1-1)次比 1(1-2)次,P=0.009]、较短的置管时间[(均数(IQR):39(32-48.5)秒比 48(44-54.8)秒,P=0.000]和更多的针重新定向[(均数(IQR):0(0-1)次比 0(0-0)次,P=0.000]。在总体成功率、首次穿刺成功率、针可视性或机械并发症发生率方面,A 组与 NG 组之间无差异。结论:在超声引导下的 SCV 平面内导管插入术中,与针引导技术相比,瞄准方法提供了类似的针束对准,并且置管时间更短。