Ogungbe Oluwabunmi, Byiringiro Samuel, Adedokun-Afolayan Adeola, Seal Stella M, Dennison Himmelfarb Cheryl R, Davidson Patricia M, Commodore-Mensah Yvonne
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
School of Public Health, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Apr 29;15:885-897. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S296280. eCollection 2021.
The burden of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Medications are integral to the management and control of CVD; however, suboptimal adherence impacts health outcomes. This systematic review aims to critically examine interventions targeted at improving medication adherence among persons with CVD in LMICs.
In this systematic review, we searched online databases PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL for studies that evaluated a medication adherence intervention for CVD, reported adherence as an outcome measure, were conducted in LMICs and reported the strategy or tool used to measure adherence. We included articles published in English, available in full text, peer-reviewed, and published between 2010 and 2020.
We included 45 articles in this review. The majority of the studies implemented counseling and educational interventions led by nurses, pharmacists, or community health workers. Many of the studies delivered medication-taking reminders in the form of phone calls, text messages, short message services (SMS), and in-phone calendars. Multi-component interventions were more effective than unifocal interventions. Interventions involving technology, such as mobile phone calls, electronic pillboxes, and interactive phone SMS reminders, were more effective than generic reminders. The outcomes reported in the studies varied based on the complexity and combination of strategies. When interventions were implemented at both the patient level, such as reminders, and at the provider level, such as team-based care, the effect on medication adherence was larger.
In LMICs, medication adherence interventions among persons with CVD included a combination of patient education, reminders, fixed-dose combination therapy and team-based care approach were generally more effective than singular interventions. Among patients who had CVD, the medication adherence interventions were found to be moderately effective. Future studies focusing on improving medication adherence in LMICs should consider non-physician-led interventions and appropriately adapt the interventions to the local context.
低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)心血管疾病(CVD)负担沉重。药物治疗是心血管疾病管理和控制的重要组成部分;然而,依从性欠佳会影响健康结局。本系统评价旨在严格审查针对改善LMICs中心血管疾病患者药物治疗依从性的干预措施。
在本系统评价中,我们检索了在线数据库PubMed、Embase和CINAHL,以查找评估心血管疾病药物治疗依从性干预措施、将依从性作为结局指标、在LMICs中开展且报告了用于测量依从性的策略或工具的研究。我们纳入了2010年至2020年间以英文发表、全文可获取、经过同行评审的文章。
我们在本评价中纳入了45篇文章。大多数研究实施了由护士、药剂师或社区卫生工作者主导的咨询和教育干预措施。许多研究通过电话、短信、短消息服务(SMS)和手机日历等形式提供服药提醒。多成分干预措施比单一焦点干预措施更有效。涉及技术的干预措施,如手机通话、电子药盒和交互式手机短信提醒,比一般提醒更有效。研究报告的结局因策略的复杂性和组合而异。当在患者层面(如提醒)和提供者层面(如团队式护理)都实施干预措施时,对药物治疗依从性的影响更大。
在LMICs中,心血管疾病患者的药物治疗依从性干预措施包括患者教育、提醒、固定剂量联合治疗和团队式护理方法的组合,通常比单一干预措施更有效。在患有心血管疾病的患者中,药物治疗依从性干预措施被发现具有中等效果。未来聚焦于改善LMICs中药物治疗依从性的研究应考虑非医生主导的干预措施,并使干预措施适应当地情况。