Alhassan Abdul-Rauf Malimanga, Yang Chuanjie, Ma Weiwei, Li Guang
College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Department of Water Resources and Sustainable Development, University of Environment and Sustainable Development, Somanya, Eastern Region, Ghana.
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 12;9:e11064. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11064. eCollection 2021.
The effects of climate change such as dry spells, floods and erosion heavily impact agriculture especially smallholder systems on the Northwestern Loess Plateau of China. Nonetheless agriculture also contributes to global warming through the emission of greenhouse gases such as CO, CH and NO. Yet this complex conundrum can be alleviated and mitigated through sound soil and water management practices. Despite considerable literature on Conservation Agriculture (CA) as a strategy to improve the resilience and mitigation capacity of agroecosystems, there is still paucity of information on the impacts of CA on crop production and environmental quality on the Plateau. In order to fill this gap this study examined the effects of no-till and straw mulch on crop productivity and greenhouse gas fluxes in agroecosystems on the Plateau where farmers' common practice of conventional tillage (CT) was tested against three CA practices: conventional tillage with straw mulch (CTS), no-till (NT) and no-till with straw mulch (NTS). The results indicated that all three CA practices (CTS, NT and NTS) markedly increased soil water content (SWC), soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil total nitrogen (STN) but reduced soil temperature (ST). Average grain yields were 854.46 ± 76.51, 699.30 ± 133.52 and 908.18±38.64 kg ha respectively under CTS, NT and NTS indicating an increase by approximately 33%, 9% and 41% respectively compared with CT (644.61 ± 76.98 kg ha). There were significant ( < 0.05) reductions of Net CO emissions under NT (7.37 ± 0.89 tCO2e hay) and NTS (6.65 ± 0.73 tCO2e hay) compared with CTS (10.65 ± 0.18 tCO2e hay) and CT (11.14 ± 0.58 tCO2e hay). All the treatments served as sinks of CHbut NTS had the highest absorption capacity (-0.27 ± 0.024 tCO2e hay) and increased absorption significantly ( < 0.05) compared with CT (-0.21 ± 0.017 tCO2e hay); however, CA did not reduce emissions of NO. These had an influence on Global warming potential (GWP) as NT and NTS resulted in significant reduction in net GWP. Grain yield was significantly correlated positively with SOC and STN ( < 0.05); ecosystem respiration was also significantly correlated with SWC and ST while CH flux was highly correlated with ST ( < 0.001). Crop yield and GHG responses to CA were controlled by soil hydrothermal and nutrient changes, thus improving these conditions through adoption of sustainable soil moisture improvement practices such as no-till, straw mulch, green manuring, contour ploughing and terracing can improve crop resilience to climate change and reduce GHG emissions in arid and semi-arid regions.
干旱期、洪水和侵蚀等气候变化的影响严重冲击农业,尤其是中国西北黄土高原的小农户系统。尽管如此,农业也通过排放二氧化碳、甲烷和一氧化二氮等温室气体加剧全球变暖。然而,通过合理的土壤和水资源管理措施,可以缓解和减轻这一复杂难题。尽管有大量关于保护性农业(CA)作为提高农业生态系统恢复力和减缓能力策略的文献,但关于CA对黄土高原作物产量和环境质量影响的信息仍然匮乏。为填补这一空白,本研究考察了免耕和秸秆覆盖对黄土高原农业生态系统作物生产力和温室气体通量的影响,将农民常用的传统耕作(CT)与三种CA措施进行对比:秸秆覆盖传统耕作(CTS)、免耕(NT)和秸秆覆盖免耕(NTS)。结果表明,所有三种CA措施(CTS、NT和NTS)均显著提高了土壤含水量(SWC)、土壤有机碳(SOC)和土壤全氮(STN),但降低了土壤温度(ST)。CTS、NT和NTS处理下的平均粮食产量分别为854.46±76.51、699.30±133.52和908.18±38.64千克/公顷,与CT(644.61±76.98千克/公顷)相比,分别增加了约33%、9%和41%。与CTS(10.65±0.18吨二氧化碳当量/公顷)和CT(11.14±0.58吨二氧化碳当量/公顷)相比,NT(7.37±0.89吨二氧化碳当量/公顷)和NTS(6.65±0.73吨二氧化碳当量/公顷)的净二氧化碳排放量显著降低(P<0.05)。所有处理均为甲烷吸收汇,但NTS的吸收能力最高(-0.27±0.024吨二氧化碳当量/公顷),与CT(-0.21±0.017吨二氧化碳当量/公顷)相比,吸收量显著增加(P<0.05);然而,CA措施并未减少一氧化二氮的排放。这些对全球变暖潜势(GWP)产生了影响,因为NT和NTS导致净GWP显著降低。粮食产量与SOC和STN显著正相关(P<0.05);生态系统呼吸也与SWC和ST显著相关,而甲烷通量与ST高度相关(P<0.001)。作物产量和温室气体对CA措施的响应受土壤水热和养分变化控制,因此,通过采用免耕、秸秆覆盖、绿肥、等高耕作和梯田等可持续土壤水分改善措施来改善这些条件,可以提高干旱和半干旱地区作物对气候变化的恢复力并减少温室气体排放。