• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌表观扩散系数值与组织病理学因素的相关性。

Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and histopathologic factors in breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ha Noi Medical University Hospital, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.

Department of Radiology, Ha Noi Medical Uni-versity, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.

出版信息

Clin Ter. 2021 May 5;172(3):218-224. doi: 10.7417/CT.2021.2318.

DOI:10.7417/CT.2021.2318
PMID:33956041
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy dia-gnosed in women, and the incidence gradually increases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is become widely used to identify benign and malignant breast tumors. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and histopathologic prognostic factors in breast cancer.

METHODS

Forty-nine breast carcinoma patients were included evaluated for prognostic factors, including histological type, histo-logical grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and molecular subtype. Minimum (ADCmin) and mean (ADCmean) ADC values were compared among prognostic factor groups by Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Lower mean ADCmin and ADCmean values were observed for no special type (NST) than for invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) type (0.81 ± 0.03 × 10-3 and 0.96 ± 0.03 × 10-3 mm2/s, P= 0.002 and 0.03, respectively). The mean ADCmin and ADCmean values for the high-level Ki-67 group were significantly lower than those for the low-level Ki-67 group (P = 0.001 and 0.008, respectively). No correlations were observed between ADC values and histological grades, ER, PR, HER2, and molecular subtypes.

CONCLUSION

ADCmin and ADCmean values correlated with the pro-liferation marker Ki-67 and histological grade. ADC values can serve as noninvasive indicators of cell proliferation in breast cancer.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌是女性最常见的恶性肿瘤,发病率逐渐增高。磁共振成像(MRI)广泛用于识别良恶性乳腺肿瘤。目的:本研究旨在评估乳腺癌表观扩散系数(ADC)值与组织病理学预后因素之间的关系。

方法

纳入 49 例乳腺癌患者,评估包括组织学类型、组织学分级、雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)和分子亚型等预后因素。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较各预后因素组的最小 ADC(ADCmin)和平均 ADC(ADCmean)值。

结果

非特殊类型(NST)的平均 ADCmin 和 ADCmean 值低于浸润性小叶癌(ILC)类型(0.81±0.03×10-3 和 0.96±0.03×10-3mm2/s,P=0.002 和 0.03)。高 Ki-67 组的平均 ADCmin 和 ADCmean 值明显低于低 Ki-67 组(P=0.001 和 0.008)。ADC 值与组织学分级、ER、PR、HER2 和分子亚型之间无相关性。

结论

ADCmin 和 ADCmean 值与增殖标志物 Ki-67 和组织学分级相关。ADC 值可作为乳腺癌细胞增殖的无创指标。

相似文献

1
Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and histopathologic factors in breast cancer.乳腺癌表观扩散系数值与组织病理学因素的相关性。
Clin Ter. 2021 May 5;172(3):218-224. doi: 10.7417/CT.2021.2318.
2
Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.3.0T下表观扩散系数的直方图分析:与浸润性导管癌预后因素及亚型的相关性
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Dec;42(6):1666-78. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24934. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
3
The role of diffusion weighted imaging as supplement to dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: Can it help predict malignancy, histologic grade and recurrence?扩散加权成像作为动态对比增强乳腺 MRI 的补充:它能帮助预测恶性肿瘤、组织学分级和复发吗?
Acad Radiol. 2019 Jul;26(7):923-929. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
4
Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.弥散加权成像表观扩散系数值与乳腺癌预后因素的相关性。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):e474-9. doi: 10.1259/bjr/79381464. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
5
Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?表观扩散系数能否区分子宫内膜样腺癌的分级及子宫内膜癌的组织学亚型?
Acta Radiol. 2018 Mar;59(3):363-370. doi: 10.1177/0284185117716198. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
6
Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.乳腺癌中FDG-PET的SUVmax及扩散加权磁共振成像的ADC值与病理预后因素的相关性
Eur J Radiol. 2016 May;85(5):943-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
7
[Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient in diffusion?weighted magnetic resonance imaging and molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer masses].[扩散加权磁共振成像中表观扩散系数与浸润性乳腺癌肿块分子亚型的相关性]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2017 Oct 20;37(10):1410-1414. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.10.22.
8
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping as a quantitative imaging biomarker for prediction of immunohistochemical receptor status, proliferation rate, and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.弥散加权成像(DWI)及其表观扩散系数(ADC)图作为一种定量影像学生物标志物,可预测乳腺癌的免疫组织化学受体状态、增殖率和分子亚型。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Sep;50(3):836-846. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26697. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
9
Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.乳腺癌的扩散加权成像:表观扩散系数值与预后因素的相关性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Sep;30(3):615-20. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21884.
10
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer.通过3.0特斯拉磁共振成像获得的定量表观扩散系数测量作为乳腺癌肿瘤侵袭性的潜在无创标志物。
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Sep;85(9):1651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperatively predicting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low expression in breast cancer using neural network model based on multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging.基于多参数磁共振成像的神经网络模型术前预测乳腺癌中人表皮生长因子受体2低表达
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):8387-8401. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-428. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
2
Diffusion-Weighted MRI for the Assessment of Molecular Prognostic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer.扩散加权磁共振成像在乳腺癌分子预后生物标志物评估中的应用。
Korean J Radiol. 2024 Jul;25(7):623-633. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.1188.
3
Comparison of the monoexponential and biexponential models of diffusion-weighted magnetic imaging in grading clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a case-control study.
扩散加权磁共振成像单指数模型与双指数模型在透明细胞肾细胞癌分级中的比较:一项病例对照研究
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 May 31;13(5):792-801. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-141. Epub 2024 May 28.
4
Construction and validation of a prognostic nutritional index-based nomogram for predicting pathological complete response in breast cancer: a two-center study of 1,170 patients.基于预后营养指数的列线图预测乳腺癌病理完全缓解的构建与验证:一项对1170例患者的双中心研究
Front Immunol. 2024 Jan 11;14:1335546. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1335546. eCollection 2023.
5
Correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI characteristics and apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67-positive expression in non-mass enhancement of breast cancer.乳腺癌非肿块增强区的动态对比增强 MRI 特征与 Ki-67 阳性表达的表观扩散系数的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 5;13(1):21451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48445-2.
6
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features and apparent diffusion coefficient value of HER2-positive/HR-negative breast carcinoma.人表皮生长因子受体2阳性/激素受体阴性乳腺癌的动态对比增强磁共振成像特征及表观扩散系数值
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Aug 1;13(8):4816-4825. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-1318. Epub 2023 May 12.
7
The utility of diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiation of phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma and breast cancer.扩散加权成像在叶状肿瘤与纤维腺瘤及乳腺癌鉴别诊断中的应用价值。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 2;13:938189. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.938189. eCollection 2023.
8
Correlation of Shear-Wave Elastography and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Breast Cancer and Their Relationship with the Prognostic Factors.乳腺癌中剪切波弹性成像与表观扩散系数值的相关性及其与预后因素的关系
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;12(12):3021. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123021.
9
Correlations between dynamic-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging quantitative parameters and postoperative recurrence or metastasis and clinicopathological features in breast cancer patients-a retrospective cohort study.乳腺癌患者动态增强磁共振成像定量参数与术后复发或转移及临床病理特征的相关性——一项回顾性队列研究
Gland Surg. 2022 Aug;11(8):1374-1382. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-400.
10
Differentiation Between Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis and Breast Cancer Using Quantitative Parameters on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.使用超声造影定量参数鉴别肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎与乳腺癌
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 15;12:876487. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.876487. eCollection 2022.