Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
J Couns Psychol. 2021 Jul;68(4):457-466. doi: 10.1037/cou0000553. Epub 2021 May 6.
Research in clinical supervision has primarily focused on the contribution of supervisors to training outcome. However, peers may also play a significant role in trainees' development, particularly during group supervision. Fifty-three trainees from 10 supervision groups completed measures of peer relationship, supervisory working alliance (SWA), supervision satisfaction (SAT), and counseling self-efficacy (CSE) at three time points during a 20-week counseling practicum at a department clinic in Hong Kong. Multilevel modeling was conducted to test the hypothesis that both peer relationship and SWA contribute to SAT and CSE. The path model results showed that higher within- and between-trainee SWA was associated with higher SAT, and higher between-trainee SWA was associated with higher CSE. Better within- and between-trainee peer relationship was associated with higher CSE, but not with SAT. Thus, when peer relationship and SWA were entered as predictors into the same analysis and allowed to control for each other's effects, they each have unique contributions to the outcome of group supervision. Implications for training and supervision research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
临床督导研究主要集中在督导对培训结果的贡献上。然而，同伴在学员的发展中也可能发挥重要作用，尤其是在团体督导中。在香港某系诊所的 20 周咨询实习期间，来自 10 个督导小组的 53 名学员在三个时间点完成了同伴关系、督导工作联盟（SWA）、督导满意度（SAT）和咨询自我效能感（CSE）的测量。采用多层次模型检验了同伴关系和 SWA 对 SAT 和 CSE 均有贡献的假设。路径模型结果表明，较高的同组内和同组间 SWA 与较高的 SAT 相关，而较高的同组间 SWA 与较高的 CSE 相关。更好的同组内和同组间同伴关系与更高的 CSE 相关，但与 SAT 无关。因此，当将同伴关系和 SWA 作为预测因素纳入同一分析并允许相互控制影响时，它们各自对团体督导的结果有独特的贡献。讨论了对培训和督导研究的影响。（PsycInfo 数据库记录（c）2021 APA，保留所有权利）。
