Suppr超能文献

[医疗办公室的处方应用程序,但如何实现?基于案例的DHA使用的医学伦理问题概述]

[Apps on Prescription in the Medical Office, but how? A Case-based Problem Outline of Medical-ethical Implications of DHA Usage].

作者信息

Kuhn Eva, Rogge Annette, Schreyer KorbinianFelix, Buyx Alena

机构信息

Sektion Global Health, Institut für Hygiene und Öffentliche Gesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.

Institut für Experimentelle Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Aug;84(8-09):696-700. doi: 10.1055/a-1473-5655. Epub 2021 May 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the approval of the digital care law (Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz-DVG) on 19.12.2019, physicians have been able to prescribe digital health applications (DHA). Patients are now entitled to such applications. The present article sets out to clarify how physicians should integrate DHAs into patient care and the ethical responsibilities they have in this process.

METHODS

Based on an adapted principle-oriented case analysis, three hypothetical case scenarios are discussed. The argumentative-analytical approach is based on four established principles of medical ethics (following Beauchamp and Childress), namely autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice, as well as on the Model Professional Code of Conduct for Physicians working in Germany (MBO-Ä).

RESULTS

When prescribing DHAs, physicians need to give patients additional information on the specific risks that result from such applications. Special attention must be paid to patients' digital health literacy. Furthermore, DHAs should not replace personal contact, but complement and support guideline-based treatment. To enable patients to use DHAs more independently, we recommend an 'app anamnesis'.

CONCLUSION

Beauchamp's and Childress's principles as well as the MBO-Ä are instructive for handling DHAs in patient care. The Dos and Don'ts presented must be complemented by further guidance providing orientation for physicians on how to integrate DHAs in patient care in a responsible way.

摘要

背景

自2019年12月19日数字护理法(Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz-DVG)获批以来,医生已能够开具数字健康应用程序(DHA)。患者现在有权使用此类应用程序。本文旨在阐明医生应如何将数字健康应用程序纳入患者护理以及他们在此过程中的伦理责任。

方法

基于一种经过调整的原则导向型案例分析,讨论了三个假设的案例场景。论证分析方法基于医学伦理学的四项既定原则(遵循博尚和奇尔德雷斯),即自主、行善、不伤害和公正,以及德国医生的《模范职业行为准则》(MBO-Ä)。

结果

在开具数字健康应用程序时,医生需要向患者提供有关此类应用程序所带来的特定风险的额外信息。必须特别关注患者的数字健康素养。此外,数字健康应用程序不应取代个人接触,而应补充并支持基于指南的治疗。为使患者能够更独立地使用数字健康应用程序,我们建议采用“应用程序问诊”。

结论

博尚和奇尔德雷斯的原则以及《模范职业行为准则》对在患者护理中处理数字健康应用程序具有指导意义。所提出的注意事项必须辅之以进一步的指导,为医生提供关于如何以负责任的方式将数字健康应用程序纳入患者护理的方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验