Suppr超能文献

早期程序性训练增加麻醉学住院医师的临床产出:临床培训收益的比较前后研究。

Early procedural training increases anesthesiology residents' clinical production: a comparative pre-post study of the payoff in clinical training.

机构信息

Centre for Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 82, Building B, DK-8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2021 May 6;21(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02693-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Competency-based education has been shown to enhance clinical skills, improve patient care, and reduce number of complications resulting in a better return on investments. Residents constitute an important workforce at many hospitals. Yet, the effect of training on residents' contribution to production in patient care is scarcely studied. This study evaluated the effects of early competency-based procedural training on residents' contribution to patient care in central venous catheterization and spinal and epidural anesthesia.

METHODS

The design was a non-randomized cohort study of first-year anesthesiology residents. The intervention group received additional early focused skills training while three control groups received traditional competency-based education. The residents' contributions to patient care were compared between the intervention group (n = 20), a historical control group (n = 19), and between a contemporary control group (n = 7) and a historical control group (n = 7) from different departments. The residents' vs specialists' procedural production share was compared between years within each study group. We calculated specialist time saved compared to the time spent providing additional skills training in the intervention group.

RESULTS

We found statistically significant increases in residents' vs specialists' share of total production after the intervention for epidural anesthesia: 2015: 0.51 (0.23, 0.70) to 2017: 0.94 (0.78, 1.05), p = 0.011 and central venous catheterization: 2015: 0.30 (0.23, 0.36) to 2016: 0.46 (0.35, 0.55), p = .008; and to 2017: 0.64 (0.50, 0.79), p = 0.008. Comparison between residents and specialists on production of the three procedures before and after the intervention showed a surplus of 21 h of freed specialist time per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Early procedural training results in more productive residents and freed specialist time for additional supervision, other clinical tasks or research. This provides empirical support for a positive correlation between early focused training and increased independent production among residents.

摘要

背景

基于能力的教育已被证明可以提高临床技能、改善患者护理并减少导致投资回报更好的并发症数量。住院医师在许多医院构成了重要的劳动力。然而,培训对住院医师在患者护理方面的工作贡献的影响很少有研究。本研究评估了早期基于能力的程序培训对中心静脉置管术和脊柱和硬膜外麻醉中住院医师对患者护理贡献的影响。

方法

这是一项对第一年麻醉学住院医师进行的非随机队列研究。干预组接受了额外的早期重点技能培训,而三个对照组则接受了传统的基于能力的教育。干预组(n=20)与历史对照组(n=19)以及来自不同科室的同期对照组(n=7)与历史对照组(n=7)之间比较了住院医师对患者护理的贡献。在每个研究组内,比较了住院医师与专家在程序生产方面的比例。我们计算了与干预组提供额外技能培训所花费的时间相比,专家节省的时间。

结果

我们发现,干预后硬膜外麻醉和中心静脉置管术的住院医师与专家的总生产比例均有统计学显著增加:2015 年:0.51(0.23,0.70)至 2017 年:0.94(0.78,1.05),p=0.011 和 2015 年:0.30(0.23,0.36)至 2016 年:0.46(0.35,0.55),p=0.008;和 2017 年:0.64(0.50,0.79),p=0.008。干预前后,住院医师与专家在三种程序上的生产比较显示,每年可节省 21 小时的专家时间。

结论

早期程序培训可使住院医师更具生产力,并为额外的监督、其他临床任务或研究释放专家时间。这为早期重点培训与住院医师独立生产增加之间的正相关关系提供了经验支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceda/8103582/297028f66870/12909_2021_2693_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验