Hashemian Seyed Mohammadreza, Shafigh Navid, Afzal Golnaz, Jamaati Hamidreza, Mortaz Esmaeil, Tabarsi Payam, Marjani Majid, Malekmohammad Majid, Dastan Farzaneh, Mortazavi Seyed Mehdi, Sadr Makan, Idani Esmaeil, Khoundabi Batoul, Mohamadnia Abdolreza, Abedini Atefeh, Kiani Arda, Moniri Afshin, Nadji Seyed Alireza, Yassari Fatemeh, Mokhber Dezfuli Mojtaba, Pourabdollah Mihan, Varahram Mohammad, Eshaghi Faezeh, Malekpour Mahdi, Velayati Aliakbar
Chronic Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tanaffos. 2020 Dec;19(4):291-299.
Inflammatory mediators are an important component in the pathophysiology of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to assess the effects of reducing inflammatory mediators using hemoperfusion (HP) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on the mortality of patients with COVID-19.
Twelve patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were included. All patients had acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Patients were divided into three groups, namely, HP, CRRT and HP+CRRT. The primary outcome was mortality and the secondary outcomes were oxygenation and reduction in inflammatory mediators at the end of the study.
Patients were not different at baseline in demographics, inflammatory cytokine levels, and the level of acute phase reactants. Half of the patients (3 out of 6) in the HP+CRRT group survived along with the survival of one patient (1 out of 2) in the HP group. All four patients in the CRRT group died. Serum creatinine (SCr), Interleukin-1 (IL1), Interleukin-6 (IL6), Interleukin-8 (IL8), partial pressure of oxygen (PaO), O saturation (O sat), and hemodynamic parameters improved over time in HP+CRRT and CRRT groups, but no significant difference was observed in the HP group (All Ps > 0.05).
Combined HP and CRRT demonstrated the best result in terms of mortality, reduction of inflammatory mediators and oxygenation. Further investigations are needed to explore the role of HP+CRRT in COVID-19 patients.
炎症介质是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)病理生理学的重要组成部分。本研究旨在评估采用血液灌流(HP)和连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)降低炎症介质对COVID-19患者死亡率的影响。
纳入12例确诊为COVID-19的患者。所有患者均患有急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。患者分为三组,即HP组、CRRT组和HP+CRRT组。主要结局是死亡率,次要结局是研究结束时的氧合情况和炎症介质减少情况。
患者在人口统计学、炎症细胞因子水平和急性期反应物水平方面基线无差异。HP+CRRT组一半的患者(6例中的3例)存活,HP组有1例患者(2例中的1例)存活。CRRT组的4例患者全部死亡。HP+CRRT组和CRRT组的血清肌酐(SCr)、白细胞介素-1(IL1)、白细胞介素-6(IL6)、白细胞介素-8(IL8)、氧分压(PaO)、氧饱和度(O sat)和血流动力学参数随时间改善,但HP组未观察到显著差异(所有P>0.05)。
就死亡率、炎症介质减少和氧合而言,HP与CRRT联合应用效果最佳。需要进一步研究以探索HP+CRRT在COVID-19患者中的作用。