Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 患者的血液灌流和血液净化策略:系统评价。

Hemoperfusion and blood purification strategies in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, AOU Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele Catania, Catania, Italy.

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2021 Dec;45(12):1466-1476. doi: 10.1111/aor.14078. Epub 2021 Oct 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) ranges from asymptomatic infection to severe cases requiring admission to the intensive care unit. Together with supportive therapies (ventilation in particular), the suppression of the pro-inflammatory state has been a hypothesized target. Pharmacological therapies with corticosteroids and interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor antagonists have reduced mortality. The use of extracorporeal cytokine removal, also known as hemoperfusion (HP), could be a promising non-pharmacological approach to decrease the pro-inflammatory state in COVID-19.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases in order to summarize the evidence regarding HP therapy in COVID-19. We included original studies and case series enrolling at least five patients.

RESULTS

We included 11 articles and describe the characteristics of the populations studied from both clinical and biological perspectives. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally low. Only two studies had a control group, one of which included 101 patients in total. The remaining studies had a range between 10 and 50 patients included. There was large variability in the HP techniques implemented and in clinical and biological outcomes reported. Most studies described decreasing levels of IL-6 after HP treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our review does not support strong conclusions regarding the role of HP in COVID-19. Considering the very low level of clinical evidence detected, starting HP therapies in COVID-19 patients does not seem supported outside of clinical trials. Prospective randomized data are needed.

摘要

背景

新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的范围从无症状感染到需要入住重症监护病房的严重病例。除了支持性治疗(特别是通气)外,抑制促炎状态一直是一个假设的目标。皮质类固醇和白细胞介素 6(IL-6)受体拮抗剂等药物治疗已降低了死亡率。细胞因子体外清除(也称为血液灌流(HP))的使用可能是一种有前途的非药物方法,可以降低 COVID-19 的促炎状态。

方法

我们对 PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库进行了系统回顾,以总结关于 COVID-19 中 HP 治疗的证据。我们纳入了至少纳入 5 名患者的原始研究和病例系列。

结果

我们纳入了 11 篇文章,并从临床和生物学角度描述了研究人群的特征。纳入研究的方法学质量普遍较低。只有两项研究有对照组,其中一项研究总共纳入了 101 名患者。其余研究纳入的患者数量在 10 到 50 之间不等。实施的 HP 技术和报告的临床和生物学结果存在很大差异。大多数研究描述了 HP 治疗后 IL-6 水平的降低。

结论

我们的综述不支持 HP 在 COVID-19 中作用的强烈结论。考虑到检测到的临床证据水平非常低,在临床试验之外,似乎不支持在 COVID-19 患者中开始 HP 治疗。需要前瞻性随机数据。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
The Global Burden of Sepsis and Septic Shock.脓毒症和感染性休克的全球负担
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;5(3):456-478. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia5030032.

本文引用的文献

1
Cytokine adsorption in severe, refractory septic shock.严重难治性脓毒症休克中的细胞因子吸附
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1334-1336. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06512-0. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验