Suppr超能文献

烧伤后随访率低得惊人,与社会因素有关。

Follow-up After Burn Injury Is Disturbingly Low and Linked With Social Factors.

机构信息

UC Davis School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, USA.

Department of Surgery, Division of Burn Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, USA.

出版信息

J Burn Care Res. 2021 Aug 4;42(4):627-632. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab065.

Abstract

For medical and social reasons, it is important that burn patients attend follow-up appointments (FUAs). Our goal was to examine the factors leading to missed FUAs in burn patients. A retrospective chart review was conducted of adult patients admitted to the burn center from 2016 to 2018. Data collected included burn characteristics, social history, and zip code. Data analysis was conducted using chi-square, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests, and multivariate regression models. A total of 878 patients were analyzed, with 224 (25.5%) failing to attend any FUAs and 492 (56.0%) missing at least one appointment (MA). Patients who did not attend any FUAs had smaller burns (4.5 [8]% vs 6.5 [11]% median [inter quartile range]), traveled farther (70.2 [111.8] vs 52.5 [76.7] miles), and were more likely to be homeless (22.8% vs 6.9%) and have drug dependence (47.3% vs 27.2%). Patients who had at least one MA were younger (42 [26] vs 46 [28] years) and more likely to be homeless (17.5% vs 2.6%) and have drug dependence (42.5% vs 19.4%). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with never attending an FUA were distance from hospital (odds ratio [OR] 1.004), burn size (OR 0.96), and homelessness (OR 0.33). Factors associated with missing at least one FUA: age (OR 0.99), drug dependence (OR 0.46), homelessness (OR 0.22), and Emergency Department visits (OR 0.56). A high percentage of patients fail to make any appointment following their injury and/or have at least one MA. Both FUAs and MAs are influenced by social determinants of health.

摘要

出于医学和社会原因,烧伤患者定期接受随访(FUAs)非常重要。我们的目标是研究导致烧伤患者错过 FUAs 的因素。对 2016 年至 2018 年期间入住烧伤中心的成年患者进行了回顾性图表审查。收集的数据包括烧伤特征、社会史和邮政编码。使用卡方检验、Wilcoxon 秩和检验和多变量回归模型进行数据分析。共分析了 878 例患者,其中 224 例(25.5%)未参加任何 FUAs,492 例(56.0%)至少错过一次预约(MA)。未参加任何 FUAs 的患者烧伤面积较小(4.5 [8]% vs 6.5 [11]%中位数[四分位距]),路程较远(70.2 [111.8] vs 52.5 [76.7]英里),更有可能无家可归(22.8% vs 6.9%)和有药物依赖(47.3% vs 27.2%)。至少有一次 MA 的患者年龄较小(42 [26] vs 46 [28]岁),更有可能无家可归(17.5% vs 2.6%)和有药物依赖(42.5% vs 19.4%)。多变量分析显示,从未参加过 FUA 的相关因素是距离医院的距离(比值比[OR]1.004)、烧伤面积(OR 0.96)和无家可归(OR 0.33)。至少错过一次 FUA 的相关因素:年龄(OR 0.99)、药物依赖(OR 0.46)、无家可归(OR 0.22)和急诊就诊(OR 0.56)。大量患者在受伤后未能预约任何一次就诊,或至少错过了一次 MA。FUAs 和 MAs 均受健康的社会决定因素影响。

相似文献

2
Understanding Factors in Burn Patient Follow-up.了解烧伤患者随访的相关因素。
J Burn Care Res. 2023 May 2;44(3):501-507. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irab168.
3
Referral Patterns of Burn Injury in Rural Kenya.肯尼亚农村地区烧伤的转诊模式。
J Burn Care Res. 2021 May 7;42(3):454-458. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iraa187.
4
Why military personnel fail to keep medical appointments.军事人员未能按时赴约就诊的原因。
J R Army Med Corps. 2008 Mar;154(1):26-30. doi: 10.1136/jramc-154-01-08.
5
Long term mortality in critically ill burn survivors.重症烧伤幸存者的长期死亡率。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1155-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
9
Interactive home telehealth and burns: A pilot study.交互式家庭远程医疗与烧伤:一项试点研究。
Burns. 2017 Sep;43(6):1318-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.11.013. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
6
Socioeconomic Status and Outcomes After Burn Injury.烧伤后的社会经济地位与结局
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Jan-Feb;37(1):e56-62. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000327.
7
What factors influence follow-up in orthopedic trauma surgery?哪些因素会影响骨科创伤手术的随访?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Mar;135(3):321-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2151-8. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
9
Who is lost to followup?: a study of patients with distal radius fractures.失访患者分析:桡骨远端骨折患者研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):599-604. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0968-6. Epub 2009 Jul 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验