Brewster David J, Nickson Christopher P, McGloughlin Steve, Pilcher David, Sarode Vineet V, Gatward Jonathan J
Intensive Care Unit, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS One. 2021 May 7;16(5):e0251523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251523. eCollection 2021.
This paper aimed to describe the airway practices of intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand specific to patients presenting with COVID-19 and to inform whether consistent clinical practice was achieved. Specific clinical airway guidelines were endorsed in March 2020 by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) and College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM).
Prospective, structured questionnaire for all ICU directors in Australia and New Zealand was completed by 69 ICU directors after email invitation from ANZICS. The online questionnaire was accessible for three weeks during September 2020 and analysed by cloud-based software. Basic ICU demographics (private or public, metropolitan or rural) and location, purchasing, airway management practices, guideline uptake, checklist and cognitive aid use and staff training relevant to airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic were the main outcome measures. The 69 ICU directors reported significant simulation-based inter-professional airway training of staff (97%), and use of video laryngoscopy (94%), intubation checklists (94%), cognitive aids (83%) and PPE "spotters" (89%) during the airway management of patients with COVID-19. Tracheal intubation was almost always performed by a Specialist (97% of ICUs), who was more likely to be an intensivist than an anaesthetist (61% vs 36%). There was a more frequent adoption of specific airway guidelines for the management of COVID-19 patients in public ICUs (94% vs 71%) and reliance on specialist intensivists to perform intubations in private ICUs (92% vs 53%).
There was a high uptake of a standardised approach to airway management in COVID-19 patients in ICUs in Australia and New Zealand, likely due to endorsement of national guidelines.
本文旨在描述澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房(ICU)针对新冠肺炎患者的气道管理措施,并了解是否实现了一致的临床实践。澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护学会(ANZICS)和重症监护医学学院(CICM)于2020年3月批准了特定的临床气道指南。
在ANZICS发出电子邮件邀请后,69位ICU主任完成了针对澳大利亚和新西兰所有ICU主任的前瞻性结构化问卷。在线问卷在2020年9月的三周内可访问,并由基于云的软件进行分析。主要观察指标包括ICU的基本人口统计学特征(私立或公立、大城市或农村)及位置、采购情况、气道管理措施、指南采用情况、检查表和认知辅助工具的使用以及在新冠肺炎大流行期间与气道管理相关的人员培训。69位ICU主任报告称,在对新冠肺炎患者进行气道管理期间,对工作人员进行了大量基于模拟的跨专业气道培训(97%),并使用了视频喉镜(94%)、插管检查表(94%)、认知辅助工具(83%)和个人防护装备“观察员”(89%)。气管插管几乎总是由专科医生进行(97%的ICU),其中重症医学专家比麻醉医生更有可能进行插管操作(61%对36%)。公立ICU更频繁地采用针对新冠肺炎患者的特定气道管理指南(94%对71%),私立ICU更依赖专科重症医学专家进行插管操作(92%对53%)。
在澳大利亚和新西兰的ICU中,对新冠肺炎患者气道管理采用标准化方法的比例很高,这可能是由于国家指南得到了认可。