Suppr超能文献

进化算法和决策树预测急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗后不良结局。

Evolutionary algorithms and decision trees for predicting poor outcome after endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Comput Biol Med. 2021 Jun;133:104414. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104414. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

Abstract

Despite the large overall beneficial effects of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke, severe disability or death still occurs in almost one-third of patients. These patients, who might not benefit from treatment, have been previously identified with traditional logistic regression models, which may oversimplify relations between characteristics and outcome, or machine learning techniques, which may be difficult to interpret. We developed and evaluated a novel evolutionary algorithm for fuzzy decision trees to accurately identify patients with poor outcome after endovascular treatment, which was defined as having a modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) higher or equal to 5. The created decision trees have the benefit of being comprehensible, easily interpretable models, making its predictions easy to explain to patients and practitioners. Insights in the reason for the predicted outcome can encourage acceptance and adaptation in practice and help manage expectations after treatment. We compared our proposed method to CART, the benchmark decision tree algorithm, on classification accuracy and interpretability. The fuzzy decision tree significantly outperformed CART: using 5-fold cross-validation with on average 1090 patients in the training set and 273 patients in the test set, the fuzzy decision tree misclassified on average 77 (standard deviation of 7) patients compared to 83 (±7) using CART. The mean number of nodes (decision and leaf nodes) in the fuzzy decision tree was 11 (±2) compared to 26 (±1) for CART decision trees. With an average accuracy of 72% and much fewer nodes than CART, the developed evolutionary algorithm for fuzzy decision trees might be used to gain insights into the predictive value of patient characteristics and can contribute to the development of more accurate medical outcome prediction methods with improved clarity for practitioners and patients.

摘要

尽管血管内治疗在急性缺血性脑卒中患者中具有显著的整体益处,但仍有近三分之一的患者会出现严重残疾或死亡。这些患者可能无法从治疗中获益,之前已经通过传统的逻辑回归模型进行了识别,但这种方法可能会使特征与结果之间的关系过于简化,或者通过机器学习技术进行识别,但这些技术可能难以解释。我们开发并评估了一种新的进化算法模糊决策树,以准确识别血管内治疗后预后不良的患者,定义为改良 Rankin 量表评分(mRS)≥5 分。所创建的决策树具有易于理解、易于解释的优点,使预测结果易于向患者和医生解释。深入了解预测结果的原因可以鼓励在实践中接受和适应,并有助于在治疗后管理患者的预期。我们将提出的方法与 CART(基准决策树算法)进行了比较,以评估分类准确性和可解释性。模糊决策树的性能明显优于 CART:使用 5 折交叉验证,训练集平均包含 1090 名患者,测试集包含 273 名患者,模糊决策树平均错误分类了 77 名(±7)患者,而 CART 则错误分类了 83 名(±7)患者。模糊决策树的平均节点数(决策节点和叶节点)为 11(±2)个,而 CART 决策树的平均节点数为 26(±1)个。所开发的模糊决策树进化算法具有平均 72%的准确率,并且节点数比 CART 少得多,它可能用于深入了解患者特征的预测价值,并有助于开发更准确的医疗结果预测方法,为医生和患者提供更清晰的信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验