School of Engineering, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, 3216, Australia.
School of Engineering and Technology, CQUniversity, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Aug 1;291:112661. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112661. Epub 2021 May 5.
The issue of waste management has received considerable critical attention due to the increase of waste generation worldwide. One of the solutions for waste disposal that has been widely implemented is through the use of the landfill due to its economic benefits. Landfill, however, results in many adverse impacts on the environment and human health. Recycling can extract some useful materials from waste, however not every waste can be recycled and a significant volume of waste, particularly the municipal solid waste (MSW) goes to landfill even though it has extractable energy potentials. Extraction of energy from MSW has been a key focus of research due to the scope of energy recovery, environmental and economic benefits. The principal concept of waste to energy is to convert waste into energy through thermal and/or biological processes. In addition, thermochemical processes such as gasification have been found as a promising technology offering several benefits. This paper presents a critical assessment of waste to energy gasification technology for MSW on processing, energy recovery, environmental performance and economic perspectives. These aspects have been analyzed for the landfill as well. The review also explored and identified suitable simulation tools for optimizing gasification. Subsequently, an assessment and comparison of different gasification reactors were carried out which indicate that the plasma gasification can be a feasible technology for MSW management due to higher energy efficiency (816 kWh/tonne) with minimum emission and lowest residue. Although plasma gasification is an energy intensive application which has relatively higher investment cost, it can be built as a large system (up to several 1000 MW system), which can make it economically competitive too. Other technologies such as; fluidized bed gasifier, fixed bed gasifier also have good energy efficiency (547-571 kWh/tonne) however, they contribute to higher CO emission. Considering overall waste management, it was found that gasification technology is beneficial to economy, environment and energy extraction compared to the landfill option. A number of tools and their relevant properties have been identified to develop appropriate gasifier model. It is expected that this study will advance further research and innovation that will be helpful to manage waste efficiently as well as to improve the environment.
由于全球废物产生量的增加,废物管理问题受到了相当多的关注。由于其经济效益,垃圾填埋场是广泛实施的废物处理方法之一。然而,垃圾填埋场对环境和人类健康造成了许多不利影响。回收可以从废物中提取一些有用的材料,但是并非每种废物都可以回收,而且大量的废物,特别是城市固体废物(MSW)即使具有可提取的能源潜力,也会被填埋。由于能源回收、环境和经济效益的范围,从 MSW 中提取能源一直是研究的重点。废物转化为能源的主要概念是通过热和/或生物过程将废物转化为能源。此外,气化等热化学过程已被发现是一种很有前途的技术,具有多种优势。本文从处理、能源回收、环境性能和经济角度对 MSW 的废物转化为能源气化技术进行了批判性评估。还对垃圾填埋场进行了分析。综述还探索并确定了用于优化气化的合适模拟工具。随后,对不同的气化反应器进行了评估和比较,结果表明,由于等离子气化的能源效率更高(816 kWh/吨),排放最少,残留物最低,因此等离子气化可能是一种可行的 MSW 管理技术。尽管等离子气化是一种能源密集型应用,投资成本相对较高,但它可以作为一个大型系统(高达数千兆瓦的系统)来建造,这也使其具有经济竞争力。其他技术,如流化床气化炉、固定床气化炉也具有良好的能源效率(547-571 kWh/吨),但它们会导致更高的 CO 排放。从整体废物管理的角度来看,与垃圾填埋场相比,气化技术在经济、环境和能源提取方面都更具优势。已经确定了一些工具及其相关特性,以开发合适的气化炉模型。预计这项研究将促进进一步的研究和创新,有助于更有效地管理废物,并改善环境。