Suppr超能文献

在以垃圾填埋为主的国家实施废物能源化选择:经济评估和温室气体影响。

Implementation of waste-to-energy options in landfill-dominated countries: Economic evaluation and GHG impact.

机构信息

Bioenergy Group, Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Sevilla, Camino de los Descubrimientos s/n, 41092 Seville, Spain.

Bioenergy Group, Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Sevilla, Camino de los Descubrimientos s/n, 41092 Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2018 Jun;76:443-456. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.039. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

Abstract

The economic and environmental impact of several waste-to-energy (WtE) schemes to produce electricity from municipal solid waste (MSW) refuse is evaluated and compared with landfill disposal. Both incineration and gasification alternatives are considered. The gasification option includes three different configurations: (1) a fluidized bed gasifier (FBG) with internal combustion engine (ICE), (2) a FBG with organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and (3) a grate gasifier with steam Rankine cycle (SRC). The study is primarily applied to regions where the management system is based on Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) plants, generating a large share of refuse (>70%), which is currently landfilled. The specific case of Andalusia, a region in the south of Spain with 23 MBT plants distributed over a region of 87.000 km, where about 80% of municipal solid waste (MSW) is currently landfilled, is taken as main reference; thereafter, the study is further extended to preliminary assess other regions of some European landfill-dominated countries with similar characteristics. The results show that both incineration and gasification improve landfill disposal, contributing favorably to greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction and fulfilling EU environmental regulations, although the three gasification options analyzed yield lower GHG emissions than incineration. In addition, gasification enables better integration of WtE into existing MBT plants, especially in the particular case of Andalusia, where MBT plants are widespread on the region, making it a more promising option than incineration, which is mainly based on large centralized plants, and less socially accepted. From the options analyzed, the WtE scheme based on FBG with ICE gives the highest profitability for a given gate fee, due to much higher electrical efficiency. However, FBG with ORC seems to be a better option in the short-term for landfill-dominated countries, due to its higher technical reliability and the low gate fee currently available in these countries.

摘要

评估并比较了几种从城市固体废物(MSW)垃圾中生产电力的废物转化为能源(WtE)方案的经济和环境影响,并与垃圾填埋处置进行了比较。同时考虑了焚烧和气化两种替代方案。气化方案包括三种不同的配置:(1)带有内燃机(ICE)的流化床气化器(FBG),(2)带有有机朗肯循环(ORC)的 FBG,以及(3)带有蒸汽朗肯循环(SRC)的炉排气化器。该研究主要应用于管理系统基于机械生物处理(MBT)工厂的地区,这些工厂产生大量的垃圾(>70%),目前这些垃圾都被填埋了。以西班牙南部的安达卢西亚地区为主要参考案例,该地区有 23 个 MBT 工厂分布在 87000 平方公里的区域内,目前约 80%的城市固体废物(MSW)被填埋;之后,研究进一步扩展到初步评估其他具有类似特征的欧洲一些以垃圾填埋为主的国家的其他地区。结果表明,焚烧和气化都可以改善垃圾填埋处置,有利于减少温室气体(GHG)排放并满足欧盟的环境法规,尽管分析的三种气化方案产生的 GHG 排放量低于焚烧。此外,气化可以更好地将 WtE 纳入现有的 MBT 工厂,特别是在安达卢西亚地区,MBT 工厂在该地区广泛分布,使其成为比主要基于大型集中式工厂的焚烧更有前途的选择,而焚烧的社会接受度较低。在所分析的方案中,基于带有 ICE 的 FBG 的 WtE 方案由于其更高的电力效率,在给定的入场费下可获得最高的盈利能力。然而,对于以垃圾填埋为主的国家,由于其更高的技术可靠性和这些国家目前可用的低入场费,基于带有 ORC 的 FBG 的方案在短期内似乎是更好的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验