School of Management, University of los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Implement Sci. 2021 May 7;16(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01114-2.
COVID-19 has presented challenges to healthcare systems and healthcare professionals internationally. After one year of the pandemic, the initial evidence on health system responses begins to consolidate, and there is a need to identify and synthesise experiences of responding to COVID-19 among healthcare professionals and other health system stakeholders. This systematic review of primary qualitative studies depicts the experiences and perceptions of organisations and actors at multiple levels of health systems internationally in responding to COVID-19.
Six main databases of biomedical information, public health and health administration research were searched over the period October 1, 2019, to October 21, 2020. Information extracted from included studies was analysed thematically.
Thirty-four studies were eligible for data extraction. Nine of those studies, of lower methodological quality, were removed from the thematic analysis of study results. Considering the professional level experiences, predominant themes of the studies consisted of the new roles and responsibilities of healthcare workers, burnout and distress, recognition of ´unseen´ healthcare workers, and positive changes and emergent solutions amid the crisis. Organisational level findings of the studies included provision of psychological support, COVID-19 as "catalyst" for change, and exercise of more "open" leadership by managers and health authorities. Continuous training, regulation of working conditions, providing supportive resources, coordinating a diversity of actors, and reviewing and updating regulations were roles identified at the local health system level.
The experiences of frontline healthcare workers have been the focus of attention of the majority of primary qualitative studies as of October 2020. However, organisational and wider system level studies indicate that some responses to COVID-19 have been characterised by increased emphasis on coordination activities by local health system actors, making service adaptations at pace, and reliance on expanded roles of front-line workers. The need for theory-informed qualitative studies was identified at the organisational level.
CRD42020202875.
COVID-19 给国际医疗体系和医疗专业人员带来了挑战。大流行一年后,关于卫生系统应对措施的初步证据开始整合,有必要确定并综合医疗专业人员和其他卫生系统利益攸关方应对 COVID-19 的经验。本项针对原始定性研究的系统评价描述了国际上各级卫生系统组织和行为体在应对 COVID-19 方面的经验和看法。
2019 年 10 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 21 日期间,检索了 6 个主要的生物医学信息、公共卫生和卫生管理研究数据库。从纳入的研究中提取信息,并进行主题分析。
34 项研究符合数据提取条件。其中 9 项研究(方法学质量较低)被排除在研究结果的主题分析之外。考虑到专业层面的经验,这些研究的主要主题包括医护人员的新角色和新责任、倦怠和困扰、对“看不见”医护人员的认可,以及危机中出现的积极变化和应急解决方案。组织层面的研究结果包括提供心理支持、COVID-19 是“变革的催化剂”,以及管理者和卫生当局实施更“开放”的领导。基层卫生系统层面确定的角色包括持续培训、工作条件规范、提供支持资源、协调各种行为体,以及审查和更新法规。
截至 2020 年 10 月,大多数原始定性研究的重点是一线医护人员的经验。然而,组织和更广泛的系统层面的研究表明,COVID-19 的一些应对措施的特点是地方卫生系统行为体更加重视协调活动,使服务能够快速适应,并依赖一线工作人员扩大其角色。在组织层面确定了需要进行理论指导的定性研究。
CRD42020202875。