• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植中肾结石的患病率和保守治疗结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Prevalence of Renal Stones and Outcomes of Conservative Treatment in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Urology Research Center, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Urol J. 2021 May 8;18(3):252-258. doi: 10.22037/uj.v18i02.6531.

DOI:10.22037/uj.v18i02.6531
PMID:33963530
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nephrolithiasis is a rare complication in transplanted kidneys and limited information is available about its therapeutic options. This study aimed to review the conservative management of urinary lithiasis and its outcomes in renal transplanted patients.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the scientific literature were performed in the Medline, Scopus, and Embase databases. Inclusion criteria were studies which include patients with kidney stones in transplanted kidney no matter de-novo or donated stones and use conservative treatment for all or part of their patients. Exclusion criteria were bladder and ureteral stones, full text unavailable, conference paper. (from January 1st, 1980, to the 19th May 2020). The results of included studies, in the final analysis, were combined using a random-effect model and using metaprop method prevalence and 95% CI of renal stone were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies (14988 transplant patients) met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis. A total of 195 patients suffered from renal stone and the prevalence of renal stone was 1.3% (95% CI: 0.89% - 1.7%). The mean age of these patients was 43 years. analysis, the prevalence of conservative treatment in 195 patients was 35% (95% CI: 19%-51%). The mean stone size ranged from 0.29 cm to 1 cm. Three studies reported a stone-free rate of %100. Except for two studies that did not report complications, other studies reported zero percent.

CONCLUSION

More than one-third of nephrolithiasis were conservatively managed in transplanted patients. Despite limited data, conservative treatment could be done in less than 4 mm stones with high Stone Free Rate (SFR) and very low complications.

摘要

背景

肾结石是移植肾脏的罕见并发症,关于其治疗选择的信息有限。本研究旨在回顾肾移植患者尿结石的保守治疗及其结果。

方法

在 Medline、Scopus 和 Embase 数据库中进行了系统的文献综述和荟萃分析。纳入标准为包括移植肾肾结石患者(无论为新发性结石还是捐赠性结石)且对所有或部分患者采用保守治疗的研究。排除标准为膀胱和输尿管结石、全文不可用、会议论文。(从 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 19 日)。最终分析中,使用随机效应模型和 metaprop 方法合并纳入研究的结果,报告肾结石的患病率和 95%CI。

结果

共有 8 项研究(14988 例移植患者)符合最终分析的纳入标准。共有 195 例患者患有肾结石,肾结石的患病率为 1.3%(95%CI:0.89%-1.7%)。这些患者的平均年龄为 43 岁。分析中,195 例患者保守治疗的患病率为 35%(95%CI:19%-51%)。结石平均大小为 0.29 厘米至 1 厘米。有 3 项研究报告结石清除率为 100%。除了 2 项未报告并发症的研究外,其他研究均报告为零。

结论

超过三分之一的肾结石在移植患者中采用保守治疗。尽管数据有限,但对于小于 4 毫米的结石,可以采用保守治疗,结石清除率高(SFR),并发症极低。

相似文献

1
The Prevalence of Renal Stones and Outcomes of Conservative Treatment in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肾移植中肾结石的患病率和保守治疗结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol J. 2021 May 8;18(3):252-258. doi: 10.22037/uj.v18i02.6531.
2
Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.输尿管镜检查及激光碎石术(URSL)治疗大型(≥1厘米)儿童结石:一所大学教学医院的治疗结果
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Apr;13(2):202.e1-202.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
3
Incidental renal stones in potential live kidney donors: prevalence, assessment and donation, including role of ex vivo ureteroscopy.潜在活体供肾者中的偶发肾结石:患病率、评估与捐献,包括离体输尿管镜检查的作用。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):784-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11572.x. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
4
[Effect of the body mass index on outcomes of ureterorenoscopy for renal stones].[体重指数对肾结石输尿管镜检查结果的影响]
Urologe A. 2016 Nov;55(11):1462-1469. doi: 10.1007/s00120-016-0132-3.
5
Role of flexible uretero-renoscopy in management of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys: single-center experience.软性输尿管肾镜在异位肾肾结石治疗中的作用:单中心经验
World J Urol. 2017 Feb;35(2):319-324. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1881-8. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
6
Retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones in children: factors influencing stone clearance and complications.逆行性肾内手术治疗儿童肾结石:影响结石清除率及并发症的因素
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Jul;49(7):1161-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.12.023. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
7
Simultaneous retrograde intrarenal surgery for ipsilateral asymptomatic renal stones in patients with ureteroscopic symptomatic ureteral stone removal.在输尿管镜下取出有症状的输尿管结石患者中,同时进行逆行性肾内手术治疗同侧无症状肾结石。
BMC Urol. 2015 Mar 19;15:22. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0016-7.
8
Kidney stones in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review.肾移植受者的肾结石:一项系统评价。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2024 Jan-Feb;48(1):79-104. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
9
Over 30-yr Experience on the Management of Graft Stones After Renal Transplantation.移植肾后移植肾结石管理的 30 余年经验。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Mar;4(2):169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
10
[Lithiasis of the transplanted kidney: therapeutical potential].[移植肾结石:治疗潜力]
Arch Esp Urol. 1996 Dec;49(10):1063-70.

引用本文的文献

1
A case of a transplanted kidney with an orthotopic kidney stone.一例原位肾结石的移植肾病例。
J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Aug 29;2024(8):rjae445. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae445. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Management of nephrolithiasis after kidney transplantation: a comprehensive review from the European Renal Association CKD-MBD working group.肾移植后肾结石的管理:来自欧洲肾脏协会慢性肾脏病-矿物质与骨异常工作组的全面综述
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Feb 6;17(2):sfae023. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae023. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
肾移植后新发尿路结石的冲击波碎石术:文献系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 29;12(13):4389. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134389.