• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良后的 LACE+、LACE+和 LACE 评分对外科出院后再入院或死亡的预测的验证。

External validation of the modified LACE+, LACE+, and LACE scores to predict readmission or death after hospital discharge.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation (C2E2), Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;27(6):1390-1397. doi: 10.1111/jep.13579. Epub 2021 May 8.

DOI:10.1111/jep.13579
PMID:33963605
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unplanned hospital readmissions are common adverse events. The LACE+ score has been used to identify patients at the highest risk of unplanned readmission or death, yet the external validity of this score remains uncertain.

METHODS

We constructed a cohort of patients admitted to hospital between 1 October 2014 and 31 January 2017 using population-based data from British Columbia (Canada). The primary outcome was a composite of urgent hospital readmission or death within 30 days of index discharge. The primary analysis sought to optimize clinical utility and international generalizability by focusing on the modified LACE+ (mLACE+) score, a variation of the LACE+ score which excludes the Case Mix Group score. Predictive performance was assessed using model calibration and discrimination.

RESULTS

Among 368,154 hospitalized individuals, 31,961 (8.7%) were urgently readmitted and 5428 (1.5%) died within 30 days of index discharge (crude composite risk of readmission or death, 9.95%). The mLACE+ score exhibited excellent calibration (calibration-in-the-large and calibration slope no different than ideal) and adequate discrimination (c-statistic, 0.681; 95%CI, 0.678 to 0.684). Higher risk dichotomized mLACE+ scores were only modestly associated with the primary outcome (positive likelihood ratio 1.95, 95%CI 1.93 to 1.97). Predictive performance of the mLACE+ score was similar to that of the LACE+ and LACE scores.

CONCLUSION

The mLACE+, LACE+ and LACE scores predict hospital readmission with excellent calibration and adequate discrimination. These scores can be used to target interventions designed to prevent unplanned hospital readmission.

摘要

背景

非计划性住院再入院是常见的不良事件。LACE+评分被用于识别再入院或死亡风险最高的患者,但该评分的外部有效性仍不确定。

方法

我们使用不列颠哥伦比亚省(加拿大)的基于人群的数据构建了一个 2014 年 10 月 1 日至 2017 年 1 月 31 日期间住院的患者队列。主要结局是指数出院后 30 天内紧急住院再入院或死亡的复合结局。主要分析通过关注改良的 LACE+(mLACE+)评分来优化临床实用性和国际通用性,mLACE+评分是 LACE+评分的一种变体,排除了病例组合组评分。通过模型校准和区分度来评估预测性能。

结果

在 368154 名住院患者中,有 31961 名(8.7%)在指数出院后 30 天内紧急再入院,5428 名(1.5%)死亡(未校正复合再入院或死亡风险为 9.95%)。mLACE+评分表现出良好的校准(大校准和斜率校准与理想情况无差异)和适度的区分度(c 统计量为 0.681;95%CI,0.678 至 0.684)。较高风险的 mLACE+评分二分法与主要结局仅有适度的相关性(阳性似然比 1.95;95%CI,1.93 至 1.97)。mLACE+评分、LACE+评分和 LACE 评分的预测性能相似。

结论

mLACE+、LACE+和 LACE 评分对医院再入院具有极好的校准和适度的区分度。这些评分可用于针对预防非计划性住院再入院的干预措施。

相似文献

1
External validation of the modified LACE+, LACE+, and LACE scores to predict readmission or death after hospital discharge.改良后的 LACE+、LACE+和 LACE 评分对外科出院后再入院或死亡的预测的验证。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;27(6):1390-1397. doi: 10.1111/jep.13579. Epub 2021 May 8.
2
Using the LACE index to predict hospital readmissions in congestive heart failure patients.使用LACE指数预测充血性心力衰竭患者的医院再入院情况。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014 Aug 7;14:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-97.
3
Derivation and validation of an index to predict early death or unplanned readmission after discharge from hospital to the community.导出并验证一个指数,以预测从医院出院后早期死亡或非计划再入院的风险。
CMAJ. 2010 Apr 6;182(6):551-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091117. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
4
LACE+ index: extension of a validated index to predict early death or urgent readmission after hospital discharge using administrative data.LACE+指数:一种经过验证的指数的扩展,用于利用行政数据预测出院后早期死亡或紧急再入院情况。
Open Med. 2012 Jul 19;6(3):e80-90. Print 2012.
5
Validation of the LACE readmission and mortality prediction model in a large surgical cohort: Comparison of performance at preoperative assessment and discharge time points.在一个大型外科队列中验证 LACE 再入院和死亡率预测模型:术前评估和出院时间点的性能比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Dec;58:22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.04.039. Epub 2019 May 2.
6
External validation of the 80+ score and comparison with three clinical scores identifying patients at least 75 years old at risk of unplanned readmission within 30 days after discharge.80+评分的外部验证以及与三种临床评分的比较,这三种临床评分用于识别至少75岁且出院后30天内有计划外再入院风险的患者。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 May 14;148:w14624. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14624. eCollection 2018.
7
Evaluating the predictive strength of the LACE index in identifying patients at high risk of hospital readmission following an inpatient episode: a retrospective cohort study.评估LACE指数在识别住院患者出院后再次入院高风险患者方面的预测强度:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e016921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016921.
8
Unplanned readmissions after hospital discharge among patients identified as being at high risk for readmission using a validated predictive algorithm.使用经过验证的预测算法被确定为再入院高风险患者出院后的非计划再入院情况。
Open Med. 2011;5(2):e104-11. Epub 2011 May 31.
9
Utility of the LACE index at the bedside in predicting 30-day readmission or death in patients hospitalized with heart failure.床边应用LACE指数预测心力衰竭住院患者30天再入院或死亡的效用。
Am Heart J. 2016 Sep;179:51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
10
HOSPITAL Score, LACE Index and LACE+ Index as predictors of 30-day readmission in patients with heart failure.医院评分、LACE 指数和 LACE+指数对心力衰竭患者 30 天再入院的预测价值。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Oct;25(5):166-167. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111271. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting survival in atrial fibrillation: results from SAGE-AF.预测心房颤动患者的生存率:SAGE-AF研究结果
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2025 Mar 28;22(3):344-350. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.03.004.
2
Comparison of long-term healthcare use among older adults with disabilities following hospitalization for COVID-19, sepsis, or influenza: a population-based cohort study.新冠病毒感染、脓毒症或流感住院后残疾老年人长期医疗保健使用情况比较:一项基于人群的队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Oct 17;39:100910. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100910. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Can prediction models for hospital readmission be improved by incorporating patient-reported outcome measures? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.
纳入患者报告结局测量能否改进医院再入院预测模型?系统评价和叙述性综合。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jul;33(7):1767-1779. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03638-8. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
4
Utility of the LACE index to assess risk of mortality and readmission in patients with spinal infections.LACE 指数在评估脊柱感染患者死亡和再入院风险中的应用。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Apr 17;47(1):163. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02411-2.
5
The Independent Association of Plasma and Red Blood Cell Zinc Concentrations with Long-Term Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients.血浆和红细胞锌浓度与住院患者长期预后的独立关联。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2023 Mar 2;7(4):100062. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.100062. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Towards artificial intelligence-based learning health system for population-level mortality prediction using electrocardiograms.迈向基于人工智能的学习型健康系统,用于利用心电图进行人群水平的死亡率预测。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Feb 6;6(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00765-3.
7
Mobile phone access and preferences among medical inpatients at an urban Canadian hospital for post-discharge planning: A pre-COVID-19 cross-sectional survey.加拿大一家城市医院住院患者出院后计划中的手机使用情况及偏好:一项新冠疫情前的横断面调查。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Nov 11;4:928602. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.928602. eCollection 2022.
8
The risk of death or unplanned readmission after discharge from a COVID-19 hospitalization in Alberta and Ontario.阿尔伯塔省和安大略省的 COVID-19 住院患者出院后的死亡或非计划性再入院风险。
CMAJ. 2022 May 16;194(19):E666-E673. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.220272.