Suppr超能文献

计算机模拟抗生素治疗成本。治疗范围的影响。

Computer modelling antibiotic therapy costs. Impact of therapeutic range.

作者信息

Gladen H E

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore.

出版信息

Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 2:208-13. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00046.

Abstract

Computer modelling techniques were used to examine the economic consequences of intravenous chemotherapy of serious infection. Acquisition cost of the drug was found to be a poor predictor of global cost, since inclusion of the preparation and administration costs and projected laboratory and drug complication costs narrow, or even reverse, apparent cost differentials between drugs. Thus, the cost per day for acquisition/total treatment (in US dollars) are: penicillin $5/$30, gentamicin $1/$46, amikacin $26/$63, clindamycin $38/$57, metronidazole $12/$20 and cefotaxime $47/$60. 'Triple therapy' involving gentamicin ($0.40/dose) resulted in higher hospital costs than the equivalent regimen involving cefotaxime ($16/dose). Even when the purchase price is high, humanitarian considerations advocate the use of safe, predictable, efficacious drugs. Fortunately, the present analysis suggests that such drugs frequently result in the lowest total treatment cost. Current cost containment efforts that are based on acquisition costs only are flawed and may result in both suboptimal care and higher actual costs.

摘要

运用计算机建模技术来研究严重感染的静脉化疗所产生的经济后果。研究发现,药物的购置成本并不能很好地预测总体成本,因为将制剂和给药成本以及预计的实验室和药物并发症成本考虑在内后,不同药物之间明显的成本差异会缩小,甚至逆转。因此,每日购置成本/总治疗成本(以美元计)分别为:青霉素5美元/30美元、庆大霉素1美元/46美元、阿米卡星26美元/63美元、克林霉素38美元/57美元、甲硝唑12美元/20美元以及头孢噻肟47美元/60美元。涉及庆大霉素(0.40美元/剂量)的“三联疗法”导致的医院成本高于涉及头孢噻肟(16美元/剂量)的等效治疗方案。即便购买价格高昂,但出于人道主义考虑,仍提倡使用安全、可预测且有效的药物。幸运的是,当前分析表明,这类药物往往会使总治疗成本最低。当前仅基于购置成本的成本控制措施存在缺陷,可能会导致护理效果欠佳以及实际成本更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验