Suppr超能文献

庆大霉素与妥布霉素的成本效益比较

Comparative cost effectiveness of gentamicin and tobramycin.

作者信息

Holloway J J, Smith C R, Moore R D, Feroli E R, Lietman P S

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1984 Dec;101(6):764-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-6-764.

Abstract

Gentamicin and tobramycin were compared for cost effectiveness in the treatment of adult patients with serious infections in a general medical service. We used data from a randomized double-blind trial in which the only observed difference between the clinical effects of these aminoglycosides was the incidence of nephrotoxicity (26% with gentamicin and 12% with tobramycin). According to 1984 cost data, the combined average drug and nephrotoxicity costs per patient were $127 for tobramycin and $72 for gentamicin. An extensive sensitivity analysis--varying frequency and cost of nephrotoxicity, dialysis requirements, aminoglycoside acquisition costs, and length of hospitalization--showed gentamicin to be more cost effective than tobramycin, unless hospitalization is prolonged by an average of at least 15 days for patients with severe nephrotoxicity or at least 3 days for all patients with moderate or severe nephrotoxicity.

摘要

在普通医疗服务中,对庆大霉素和妥布霉素治疗成年严重感染患者的成本效益进行了比较。我们使用了一项随机双盲试验的数据,在该试验中,这些氨基糖苷类药物临床效果之间唯一观察到的差异是肾毒性发生率(庆大霉素为26%,妥布霉素为12%)。根据1984年的成本数据,每位患者的药物和肾毒性综合平均成本,妥布霉素为127美元,庆大霉素为72美元。一项广泛的敏感性分析——改变肾毒性的频率和成本、透析需求、氨基糖苷类药物购置成本以及住院时间——表明,除非重度肾毒性患者的住院时间平均延长至少15天,或所有中度或重度肾毒性患者的住院时间平均延长至少3天,否则庆大霉素比妥布霉素更具成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验