University of Washington Tacoma, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 15;290:112600. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112600. Epub 2021 May 6.
Environmental governance in complex social-ecological systems involves multiple actors and institutions that interact across scales. Where hierarchical authority to command is lacking, actors may rely on resource sharing to steer actions across the landscape and reduce scale mismatch. An important resource for such cross-scale steering is scientific information. This study examines how actors in local collaborative organizations share and use scientific information across multiple parts of a polycentric governance system. Interviews from efforts in the Puget Sound, USA, to incorporate scientific information across scales reveal patterns in horizontal and vertical information sharing, the role of knowledge brokers, and scale mismatches in spatial scale and theory vs applied research. Results indicate collaborative group members frequently access scientific findings horizontally through their networks of contacts and conference attendance, as well as through document searches for journal articles and government reports. Vertical transmission relies more on knowledge brokers and guidance documents. The use of scientific findings by local collaborative organizations depends on the biophysical and political context, and there is often tension between scientific rigor and local applicability.
复杂社会-生态系统中的环境治理涉及多个跨尺度互动的行为体和机构。在缺乏层级命令权的情况下,行为体可能依赖资源共享来引导跨地域的行动,并减少尺度不匹配。这种跨尺度引导的一个重要资源是科学信息。本研究考察了地方合作组织中的行为体如何在多中心治理系统的多个部分中共享和使用科学信息。来自美国普吉特海湾的努力的访谈揭示了水平和垂直信息共享、知识经纪人的作用以及空间尺度和理论与应用研究之间的尺度不匹配的模式。研究结果表明,合作小组成员经常通过他们的联系人网络和会议出席情况以及通过期刊文章和政府报告的文档搜索,从水平方向获取科学发现。垂直传播更多地依赖于知识经纪人和指导文件。地方合作组织对科学发现的使用取决于生物物理和政治背景,并且科学严谨性和本地适用性之间常常存在紧张关系。