• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥地利索赔数据研究报告。

Reporting of Studies Conducted on Austrian Claims Data.

机构信息

Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Department of Medical Information Management, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 7;279:62-69. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210090.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI210090
Abstract

In healthcare studies, the analysis of claims data is gaining an increasingly important role. Observational studies should be reported in a manner that promotes internal and external validity assessment, with the exact and standardized description of items. Several international guidelines and checklists for reporting on secondary data are available. The aim of this work was to analyse the applicability of reporting guidelines especially for claims data. The STROSA-2 guidelines recommendations were evaluated by means of a report on a study on triptan medications in Austria. Six items were identified which could be expanded to support complete and transparent report on Austrian claims data. Therefore, we would suggest to add some details in the STROSA-2 guidelines concerning study design, legal foundations, data protection, data flow, descriptive results and risk of bias. The guidelines for reporting on Austrian claims data were successfully compiled with additional items. New guidelines should be further processed and tested with strong recommendations to focus on data limitations and legal aspects.

摘要

在医疗保健研究中,索赔数据分析的作用日益重要。观察性研究应该以促进内部和外部有效性评估的方式进行报告,对项目进行准确和标准化的描述。有几个关于二次数据报告的国际指南和清单可用。这项工作的目的是分析报告指南,特别是针对索赔数据的适用性。通过报告奥地利曲普坦药物的研究,评估了 STROSA-2 指南的建议。确定了六个可以扩展的项目,以支持对奥地利索赔数据的完整和透明报告。因此,我们建议在 STROSA-2 指南中添加一些关于研究设计、法律依据、数据保护、数据流程、描述性结果和偏差风险的详细信息。成功编制了针对奥地利索赔数据的报告指南,并添加了新项目。新的指南应进一步处理和测试,并提出强有力的建议,重点关注数据限制和法律方面。

相似文献

1
Reporting of Studies Conducted on Austrian Claims Data.奥地利索赔数据研究报告。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 7;279:62-69. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210090.
2
[STandardized Reporting Of Secondary data Analyses (STROSA)—a recommendation].[二次数据分析标准化报告(STROSA)——一项建议]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(8-9):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
3
A Consensus German Reporting Standard for Secondary Data Analyses, Version 2 (STROSA-STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen).德国二次数据分析报告标准共识,第2版(STROSA - 二次数据分析标准化报告流程)
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Sep;78(S 01):e145-e160. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108647. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
4
A Comparison of AGREE and RIGHT: which Clinical Practice Guideline Reporting Checklist Should Be Followed by Guideline Developers?AGREE 与 RIGHT 比较:指南开发者应遵循哪一个临床实践指南报告清单?
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):894-898. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05508-3. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
5
[A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement].[医疗保健实践指南报告工具:RIGHT声明]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Nov;127-128:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
6
Development of the Standards of Reporting of Neurological Disorders (STROND) checklist: A guideline for the reporting of incidence and prevalence studies in neuroepidemiology.《神经系统疾病报告标准(STROND)清单的制定:神经流行病学中发病率和患病率研究报告的指南》。
Neurology. 2015 Sep 1;85(9):821-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001866. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
7
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)——解释与说明:国际卫生经济学会健康经济评估报告指南良好报告实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.
8
Reporting Quality of Discrete Event Simulations in Healthcare-Results From a Generic Reporting Checklist.报告医疗保健中离散事件模拟的质量-使用通用报告清单的结果。
Value Health. 2020 Apr;23(4):506-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
9
Conducting and Reporting a Clinical Research Using Korean Healthcare Claims Database.利用韩国医疗保健理赔数据库开展和报告临床研究
Korean J Fam Med. 2020 May;41(3):146-152. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.20.0062. Epub 2020 May 20.
10
Guidelines for reporting the quality of clinical case reports in Endodontics: a development protocol.牙髓病学临床病例报告质量报告指南:制定方案。
Int Endod J. 2019 Jun;52(6):775-778. doi: 10.1111/iej.13067. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Transparency in the secondary use of health data: assessing the status quo of guidance and best practices.健康数据二次使用中的透明度:评估指南和最佳实践的现状
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Mar 26;12(3):241364. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241364. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
The influence of large-diameter multifocal contact lens on ocular surface, visual quality, and visual function for presbyopic adults with dry eye syndromes.大直径多焦点接触镜对干眼综合征老视成年人眼表、视觉质量和视觉功能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 9;13(1):19444. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46732-6.
3
Routine binocular examination of young Taiwanese adults as a predictor of visual behavior performance.
对台湾青年成年人进行常规双目检查以预测视觉行为表现。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb 1;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02731-1.
4
Correlating Ocular Physiology and Visual Function with Mild Cognitive Loss in Senior Citizens in Taiwan.台湾老年人轻度认知衰退与眼生理及视觉功能的相关性研究
J Clin Med. 2022 May 6;11(9):2624. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092624.
5
Risk Factor Analysis of Early-Onset Cataracts in Taiwan.台湾早发性白内障的危险因素分析。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 23;11(9):2374. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092374.
6
The influence of contact lenses with different optical designs on the binocular vision and visual behavior of young adults.不同光学设计的隐形眼镜对年轻人双眼视觉和视觉行为的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 21;12(1):6573. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10580-7.
7
Visual Function and Visual Perception among Senior Citizens with Mild Cognitive Impairment in Taiwan.台湾轻度认知障碍老年人的视觉功能与视觉感知
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 23;10(1):20. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010020.