Department of Urology, Toho University School of Medicine, 6-11-1, Omori-Nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2021 May 10;11(1):9962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89369-z.
We examined whether a tool for determining Johnsen scores automatically using artificial intelligence (AI) could be used in place of traditional Johnsen scoring to support pathologists' evaluations. Average precision, precision, and recall were assessed by the Google Cloud AutoML Vision platform. We obtained testicular tissues for 275 patients and were able to use haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained glass microscope slides from 264 patients. In addition, we cut out of parts of the histopathology images (5.0 × 5.0 cm) for expansion of Johnsen's characteristic areas with seminiferous tubules. We defined four labels: Johnsen score 1-3, 4-5, 6-7, and 8-10 to distinguish Johnsen scores in clinical practice. All images were uploaded to the Google Cloud AutoML Vision platform. We obtained a dataset of 7155 images at magnification 400× and a dataset of 9822 expansion images for the 5.0 × 5.0 cm cutouts. For the 400× magnification image dataset, the average precision (positive predictive value) of the algorithm was 82.6%, precision was 80.31%, and recall was 60.96%. For the expansion image dataset (5.0 × 5.0 cm), the average precision was 99.5%, precision was 96.29%, and recall was 96.23%. This is the first report of an AI-based algorithm for predicting Johnsen scores.
我们研究了一种使用人工智能(AI)自动确定约翰森评分的工具是否可以替代传统的约翰森评分,以支持病理学家的评估。通过谷歌云 AutoML Vision 平台评估平均精度、精度和召回率。我们获得了 275 名患者的睾丸组织,并且能够使用 264 名患者的苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色玻璃显微镜载玻片。此外,我们从组织病理学图像中切出部分(5.0×5.0cm),以扩大具有生精小管的约翰森特征区域。我们定义了四个标签:1-3 分、4-5 分、6-7 分和 8-10 分,以区分临床实践中的约翰森评分。所有图像均上传至谷歌云 AutoML Vision 平台。我们获得了 7155 张 400×放大倍数图像数据集和 9822 张 5.0×5.0cm 切出物扩展图像数据集。对于 400×放大倍数图像数据集,算法的平均精度(阳性预测值)为 82.6%,精度为 80.31%,召回率为 60.96%。对于扩展图像数据集(5.0×5.0cm),平均精度为 99.5%,精度为 96.29%,召回率为 96.23%。这是第一个报告基于人工智能的约翰森评分预测算法。