• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左右偏态彩票的风险承担。

Risk Taking with Left- and Right-Skewed Lotteries.

作者信息

Bougherara Douadia, Friesen Lana, Nauges Céline

机构信息

CEE-M, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.

School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Risk Uncertain. 2021;62(1):89-112. doi: 10.1007/s11166-021-09345-w. Epub 2021 May 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11166-021-09345-w
PMID:33967390
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8087892/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

While much literature has focused on preferences regarding risk, preferences over skewness also have significant economic implications. An important and understudied aspect of skewness preferences is how they affect risk taking. In this paper, we design a novel laboratory experiment that elicits certainty equivalents over lotteries where the variance and skewness of the outcomes are orthogonal to each other. This design enables us to cleanly measure both skewness seeking/avoiding and risk taking behavior, and their interaction, without needing to make parametric assumptions. Our experiment includes both left- and right-skewed lotteries. The results reveal that the majority of subjects are skewness avoiding risk takers who correspondingly also take more risk when facing less skewed lotteries. Our second contribution is to link these choices to individual rank-dependent utility preference parameters estimated using a separate lottery choice protocol. Using a latent-class model, we are able to identify two classes of subjects: skewness avoiders with the classic inverse s-shaped probability weighting function and skewness neutral subjects that do not have an inverse s-shaped probability weighting function. Our results thus demonstrate the link between probability distortion and skewness seeking/avoidance choices. They also highlight the importance of accounting for individual heterogeneity.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11166-021-09345-w.

摘要

未标注

尽管许多文献都聚焦于风险偏好,但偏度偏好也具有重要的经济意义。偏度偏好一个重要且未被充分研究的方面是它们如何影响冒险行为。在本文中,我们设计了一个新颖的实验室实验,该实验引出了对结果方差和偏度相互正交的彩票的确定性等价物。这种设计使我们能够清晰地测量寻求/规避偏度和冒险行为及其相互作用,而无需进行参数假设。我们的实验包括左偏和右偏彩票。结果表明,大多数受试者是规避偏度的冒险者,相应地,当面对偏度较小的彩票时,他们也会承担更多风险。我们的第二个贡献是将这些选择与使用单独的彩票选择协议估计的个体等级依赖效用偏好参数联系起来。使用潜在类别模型,我们能够识别出两类受试者:具有经典反S形概率加权函数的规避偏度者和不具有反S形概率加权函数的偏度中性受试者。因此,我们的结果证明了概率扭曲与寻求/规避偏度选择之间的联系。它们还强调了考虑个体异质性的重要性。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11166-021-09345-w获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b4/8087892/c9f1ad0aa3e8/11166_2021_9345_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b4/8087892/d6a966b7a8ed/11166_2021_9345_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b4/8087892/31a1c0cab4de/11166_2021_9345_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b4/8087892/bcf380ed624f/11166_2021_9345_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b4/8087892/cd7f8e46d824/11166_2021_9345_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b4/8087892/c9f1ad0aa3e8/11166_2021_9345_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b4/8087892/d6a966b7a8ed/11166_2021_9345_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b4/8087892/31a1c0cab4de/11166_2021_9345_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b4/8087892/bcf380ed624f/11166_2021_9345_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b4/8087892/cd7f8e46d824/11166_2021_9345_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6b4/8087892/c9f1ad0aa3e8/11166_2021_9345_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Taking with Left- and Right-Skewed Lotteries.左右偏态彩票的风险承担。
J Risk Uncertain. 2021;62(1):89-112. doi: 10.1007/s11166-021-09345-w. Epub 2021 May 1.
2
Nonlinear decision weights or moment-based preferences? A model competition involving described and experienced skewness.非线性决策权重还是基于矩的偏好?涉及描述和体验偏度的模型竞争。
Cognition. 2019 Feb;183:99-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
3
Measurement error, skewness, and risk analysis: coping with the long tail of the distribution.测量误差、偏度与风险分析:应对分布的长尾问题
Risk Anal. 2002 Apr;22(2):277-90. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.00027.
4
Utility functions predict variance and skewness risk preferences in monkeys.效用函数可预测猴子的方差和偏度风险偏好。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 26;113(30):8402-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602217113. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
5
Reward skewness coding in the insula independent of probability and loss.岛叶中与概率和损失无关的奖励偏斜编码。
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Nov;106(5):2415-22. doi: 10.1152/jn.00471.2011. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
6
Money, kisses, and electric shocks: on the affective psychology of risk.金钱、亲吻与电击:论风险的情感心理学
Psychol Sci. 2001 May;12(3):185-90. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00334.
7
Variance, skewness and multiple outcomes in described and experienced prospects: Can one descriptive model capture it all?描述和体验到的前景中的方差、偏度和多个结果:一个描述性模型能否捕捉到所有这些?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Apr;152(4):1188-1222. doi: 10.1037/xge0001323. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
8
Linguistic-Numeric Presentation Mode Effects on Risky Option Preferences.语言-数字呈现模式对风险选项偏好的影响。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1996 Nov;68(2):109-22. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0093.
9
Preference patterns for skewed gambles in rhesus monkeys.恒河猴对偏态赌博的偏好模式。
Biol Lett. 2013 Dec 11;9(6):20130902. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0902. Print 2013.
10
The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice.确定性情境对选择过程的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 18;100(6):3536-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0530279100. Epub 2003 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A risk-risk tradeoff approach for incorporating the public's risk perceptions into quantitative microbial risk assessment.一种将公众风险认知纳入定量微生物风险评估的风险-风险权衡方法。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2025 Feb;22(2):132-148. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2024.2423756. Epub 2025 Jan 2.