• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高通滤波器设置对运动诱发电位的影响。

Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials.

作者信息

Nikolov Petyo, Hassan Shady S, Schnitzler Alfons, Groiss Stefan J

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2021 Apr 23;15:665258. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.665258. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fnins.2021.665258
PMID:33967684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8102734/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Motor evoked potentials (MEP), obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are a common tool in clinical research and diagnostic. Nevertheless, reports regarding the influence of filter settings on MEP are sparse. Here, we compared MEP amplitudes and signal to noise ratio (SNR) using multiple high pass filter (HPF) and notch filter settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Recruitment curves were obtained with HPF settings varied at 10, 20, 50, and 100 Hz. The four HPF settings were tested both with and without 50 Hz active notch filter. Low pass filter was kept constant at 5 kHz.

RESULTS

MEP amplitudes with HPF at 10 and 20 Hz were significantly higher than at 100 Hz, regardless of the notch filter. However, SNR did not differ among HPF settings. An active notch filter significantly improved SNR.

CONCLUSION

The reduction in MEP amplitudes with HPF above 20 Hz may be due to noise reduction, since the different HPF conditions did not alter SNR. Thus, higher HPF above 50 Hz may be an option to reduce noise, the use of a notch filter may even improve SNR.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our findings are relevant for the selection of filter settings and might be of importance to any researcher who utilizes TMS-MEP.

摘要

目的

经颅磁刺激(TMS)获得的运动诱发电位(MEP)是临床研究和诊断中的常用工具。然而,关于滤波设置对MEP影响的报道却很少。在此,我们使用多种高通滤波器(HPF)和陷波滤波器设置比较了MEP的振幅和信噪比(SNR)。

材料与方法

20名健康受试者参与了本研究。在高通滤波器设置分别为10、20、50和100赫兹的情况下获取募集曲线。这四种高通滤波器设置在有和没有50赫兹有源陷波滤波器的情况下都进行了测试。低通滤波器保持在5千赫兹不变。

结果

无论是否有陷波滤波器,高通滤波器设置为10和20赫兹时的MEP振幅均显著高于100赫兹时的。然而,高通滤波器设置之间的信噪比并无差异。有源陷波滤波器显著提高了信噪比。

结论

20赫兹以上高通滤波器导致MEP振幅降低可能是由于噪声减少,因为不同的高通滤波器条件并未改变信噪比。因此,50赫兹以上更高的高通滤波器设置可能是降低噪声的一种选择,使用陷波滤波器甚至可能提高信噪比。

意义

我们的研究结果与滤波设置的选择相关,可能对任何使用TMS-MEP的研究人员都很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7035/8102734/55b3262d1093/fnins-15-665258-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7035/8102734/d56a9cc1d1ff/fnins-15-665258-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7035/8102734/55b3262d1093/fnins-15-665258-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7035/8102734/d56a9cc1d1ff/fnins-15-665258-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7035/8102734/55b3262d1093/fnins-15-665258-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials.高通滤波器设置对运动诱发电位的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Apr 23;15:665258. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.665258. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparing Different Filter-Parameter for Pre-Processing of Brain-Stimulation Evoked Motor Potentials.比较用于脑刺激诱发运动电位预处理的不同滤波参数
Brain Sci. 2021 Aug 24;11(9):1118. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091118.
3
Optimum Response Filter Setting for Air Conduction-Induced Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential.气导诱发眼性前庭诱发肌源性电位的最佳反应滤波器设置
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Oct;30(9):753-763. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17098. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
4
High-pass filter settings and the role and mechanism of discrete ventricular electrograms in left bundle branch pacing.高通滤波器设置以及离散心室电图在左束支起搏中的作用和机制
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 11;9:1059172. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1059172. eCollection 2022.
5
Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials.经颅磁刺激导航不能降低运动诱发电位的变异性。
Brain Stimul. 2010 Apr;3(2):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
6
Meet the challenge of high-pass filter and ST-segment requirements with a DC-coupled digital electrocardiogram amplifier.采用直流耦合数字心电图放大器应对高通滤波器和ST段要求的挑战。
J Electrocardiol. 2009 Nov-Dec;42(6):574-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.07.012. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
7
The impact of TMS and PNS frequencies on MEP potentiation in PAS with high-frequency peripheral component.TMS 和 PNS 频率对伴有高频外周成分的 PAS 中 MEP 增强的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233999. eCollection 2020.
8
Does second-scale intertrial interval affect motor evoked potentials induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation?第二尺度的试验间间隔是否会影响单次经颅磁刺激诱发的运动诱发电位?
Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):526-32. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
9
The Effect of Inter-pulse Interval on TMS Motor Evoked Potentials in Active Muscles.脉冲间期对主动肌中经颅磁刺激运动诱发电位的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Mar 22;16:845476. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.845476. eCollection 2022.
10
Reliability of diaphragmatic motor-evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.经颅磁刺激诱导膈肌运动诱发电位的可靠性。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020 Dec 1;129(6):1393-1404. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00486.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Height-dependent variation in corticospinal excitability modulation after active but not sham intermittent theta burst stimulation.主动而非伪间歇性θ波爆发刺激后皮质脊髓兴奋性调制的高度依赖性变化。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2025 Mar 13;18:498-511. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.03.005. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Common and Unique Neurophysiological Processes That Support the Stopping and Revising of Actions.支持动作停止和修正的常见及独特神经生理过程。
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 26;45(13):e1537242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1537-24.2025.
3
Recognition and Processing of Visual Information after Neuronavigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Session.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee.经颅磁刺激和电刺激:临床和研究应用的基本原理和操作规范。国际神经电生理学会技术规范委员会更新报告。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
2
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
3
神经导航经颅磁刺激治疗后视觉信息的识别与处理
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 14;12(9):1241. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091241.
4
Comparing Different Filter-Parameter for Pre-Processing of Brain-Stimulation Evoked Motor Potentials.比较用于脑刺激诱发运动电位预处理的不同滤波参数
Brain Sci. 2021 Aug 24;11(9):1118. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091118.
Forty-hertz triple-pulse stimulation induces motor cortical facilitation in humans.
40赫兹的三脉冲刺激可诱发人类运动皮质易化。
Brain Res. 2009 Nov 3;1296:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.008. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
4
Origin of facilitation of motor-evoked potentials after paired magnetic stimulation: direct recording of epidural activity in conscious humans.配对磁刺激后运动诱发电位易化的起源:清醒人类硬膜外活动的直接记录。
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Oct;96(4):1765-71. doi: 10.1152/jn.00360.2006. Epub 2006 Jun 7.
5
Exploring the connectivity between the cerebellum and motor cortex in humans.探索人类小脑与运动皮层之间的连接性。
J Physiol. 2004 Jun 1;557(Pt 2):689-700. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.059808. Epub 2004 Mar 26.
6
The physiological basis of transcranial motor cortex stimulation in conscious humans.清醒人类经颅运动皮层刺激的生理基础。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Feb;115(2):255-66. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.009.
7
Optimal signal bandwidth for the recording of surface EMG activity of facial, jaw, oral, and neck muscles.用于记录面部、下颌、口腔和颈部肌肉表面肌电活动的最佳信号带宽。
Psychophysiology. 2001 Jan;38(1):22-34.
8
Techniques and mechanisms of action of transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex.人类运动皮质经颅刺激的技术与作用机制
J Neurosci Methods. 1997 Jun 27;74(2):113-22. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(97)02242-5.
9
Frequency peaks of tremor, muscle vibration and electromyographic activity at 10 Hz, 20 Hz and 40 Hz during human finger muscle contraction may reflect rhythmicities of central neural firing.人类手指肌肉收缩期间,震颤、肌肉振动及肌电活动在10赫兹、20赫兹和40赫兹时的频率峰值可能反映了中枢神经放电的节律性。
Exp Brain Res. 1997 May;114(3):525-41. doi: 10.1007/pl00005662.
10
Intracortical facilitation and inhibition after transcranial magnetic stimulation in conscious humans.清醒人类经颅磁刺激后的皮质内易化和抑制
J Physiol. 1997 Feb 1;498 ( Pt 3)(Pt 3):817-23. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021905.