• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同一训练不同时刻的二级条件作用与条件性抑制:A+和AX-试验次数的影响

Second-Order Conditioning and Conditioned Inhibition in Different Moments of the Same Training: The Effect of A+ and AX- Trial Number.

作者信息

Muñiz-Diez Clara, Muñiz-Moreno Judit, Loy Ignacio

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Apr 21;15:632548. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.632548. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2021.632548
PMID:33967712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8097050/
Abstract

The feature negative discrimination (A+/AX) can result in X gaining excitatory properties (second-order conditioning, SOC) or in X gaining inhibitory properties (conditioned inhibition, CI), a challenging finding for most current associative learning theories. Research on the variables that modulate which of these phenomena would occur is scarce but has clearly identified the trial number as an important variable. In the set of experiments presented here, the effect of trial number was assessed in a magazine training task with rats as a function of both the conditioning sessions and the number of A+ and AX trials per session, holding constant the total number of trials per session. The results indicated that SOC is most likely to be found at the beginning of training when there are many A+ and few AX trials, and CI (as assessed by a retardation test) is most likely to be found at the end of training when there are few A+ and many AX trials. Both phenomena were also found at different moments of training when the number of A+ trials was equal to the number of AX trials. These results cannot be predicted by acquisition-focused associative models but can be predicted by theories that distinguish between learning and performance.

摘要

特征负性辨别(A+/AX)可能导致X获得兴奋性属性(二级条件作用,SOC)或使X获得抑制性属性(条件性抑制,CI),这一发现对当前大多数联想学习理论构成了挑战。关于调节这些现象中哪一种会发生的变量的研究很少,但已明确将试验次数确定为一个重要变量。在此呈现的一组实验中,在以大鼠为对象的杂志训练任务中评估了试验次数的影响,该影响是条件训练次数以及每次训练中A+和AX试验次数的函数,同时保持每次训练的试验总数不变。结果表明,当A+试验次数多而AX试验次数少时,SOC最有可能出现在训练开始时;而当A+试验次数少而AX试验次数多时,CI(通过延迟测试评估)最有可能出现在训练结束时。当A+试验次数等于AX试验次数时,在训练的不同时刻也会出现这两种现象。这些结果无法通过以习得为重点的联想模型预测,但可以通过区分学习和表现的理论来预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/75d4eacb6604/fnbeh-15-632548-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/6a88d0d9cd9f/fnbeh-15-632548-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/9a547526d531/fnbeh-15-632548-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/c951d12faf41/fnbeh-15-632548-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/edfab023e01e/fnbeh-15-632548-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/3d56606aed28/fnbeh-15-632548-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/bad0c79e592a/fnbeh-15-632548-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/75d4eacb6604/fnbeh-15-632548-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/6a88d0d9cd9f/fnbeh-15-632548-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/9a547526d531/fnbeh-15-632548-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/c951d12faf41/fnbeh-15-632548-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/edfab023e01e/fnbeh-15-632548-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/3d56606aed28/fnbeh-15-632548-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/bad0c79e592a/fnbeh-15-632548-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce33/8097050/75d4eacb6604/fnbeh-15-632548-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Second-Order Conditioning and Conditioned Inhibition in Different Moments of the Same Training: The Effect of A+ and AX- Trial Number.同一训练不同时刻的二级条件作用与条件性抑制:A+和AX-试验次数的影响
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Apr 21;15:632548. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.632548. eCollection 2021.
2
Asymmetry between excitatory and inhibitory learning.兴奋性学习与抑制性学习之间的不对称性。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Oct;42(4):297-312. doi: 10.1037/xan0000110. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
3
The fate of redundant cues: Further analysis of the redundancy effect.冗余线索的命运:对冗余效应的进一步分析。
Learn Behav. 2015 Mar;43(1):72-82. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0162-x.
4
Order effects after blocked preexposure to two compound flavors.对两种复合味道进行分组预暴露后的顺序效应。
Behav Processes. 2011 Oct;88(2):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
5
AX+, BX- discrimination learning in the fear-potentiated startle paradigm: possible relevance to inhibitory fear learning in extinction.恐惧增强惊吓范式中的AX +、BX -辨别学习:与消退中的抑制性恐惧学习的可能关联。
Learn Mem. 2004 Jul-Aug;11(4):464-75. doi: 10.1101/lm.74704. Epub 2004 Jul 14.
6
The comparator hypothesis of conditioned response generation: manifest conditioned excitation and inhibition as a function of relative excitatory strengths of CS and conditioning context at the time of testing.条件反应产生的比较器假说:在测试时,根据条件刺激(CS)和条件化情境的相对兴奋性强度表现出明显的条件性兴奋和抑制。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1987 Oct;13(4):395-406.
7
Associative changes in elements and compounds when the other is reinforced.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1999 Apr;25(2):247-55. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.25.2.247.
8
Conditioned inhibition in preweanling rats.断奶前大鼠的条件性抑制
Dev Psychobiol. 2016 Jan;58(1):98-106. doi: 10.1002/dev.21359. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
9
Cued and Contextual Fear Conditioning for Rodents啮齿动物的线索性和情境性恐惧条件反射
10
Contingent versus incidental context processing during conditioning: dissociation after excitotoxic hippocampal plus dentate gyrus lesions.条件反射过程中的偶然与附带情境加工:兴奋性毒性海马加齿状回损伤后的分离
Hippocampus. 1998;8(2):147-59. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1998)8:2<147::AID-HIPO7>3.0.CO;2-I.

引用本文的文献

1
Second-Order Conditioning in Humans.人类的二级条件作用
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jul 8;15:672628. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.672628. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Competition and facilitation in compound conditioning.复合条件作用中的竞争与促进作用
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Oct;43(4):303-314. doi: 10.1037/xan0000149. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
2
Challenges Facing Contemporary Associative Approaches to Acquired Behavior.当代后天行为联想方法面临的挑战。
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2006 Jan 1;1:77-93. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2008.10005.
3
A response rule for positive and negative stimulus interaction in associative learning and performance.关联学习与表现中正负刺激交互的反应规则。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Dec;14(6):1115-24. doi: 10.3758/bf03193100.
4
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
5
Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis.有时竞争检索(SOCR):比较器假说的一种形式化表述。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):759-83. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.759.
6
Trial number and compound stimuli temporal relationship as joint determinants of second-order conditioning and conditioned inhibition.试验编号和复合刺激的时间关系作为二级条件反射和条件性抑制的联合决定因素。
Learn Behav. 2004 May;32(2):230-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03196024.
7
The two-test strategy in the study of inhibitory conditioning.抑制性条件作用研究中的双测试策略。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1993 Oct;19(4):342-52. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.19.4.342.
8
Second-order conditioning and Pavlovian conditioned inhibition: operational similarities and differences.二级条件作用与巴甫洛夫条件性抑制:操作上的异同
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1994 Oct;20(4):419-28.
9
A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.一种巴甫洛夫式学习模型:条件刺激而非无条件刺激有效性的变化。
Psychol Rev. 1980 Nov;87(6):532-52.
10
Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction.迈向自适应网络的现代理论:期望与预测。
Psychol Rev. 1981 Mar;88(2):135-70.