• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对药品诉讼的策略:巴西的一项行动研究

Strategies to Approach Medicines Litigation: An Action Research Study in Brazil.

作者信息

Machado Fernanda Lacerda da Silva, Dos Santos Danielle Maria de Souza Serio, Lopes Luciane Cruz

机构信息

Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Macaé, Brazil.

Pharmaceutical Sciences Graduate Course, University of Sorocaba, UNISO, Sorocaba, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 22;12:612426. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.612426. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2021.612426
PMID:33967753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8100662/
Abstract

In the last decades, litigation has been increasingly used to access medicines in Brazil. This phenomenon has led to the development of diverse strategies to reduce its negative impact on the organization of pharmaceutical services. In spite of that, managers still face difficulties dealing with lawsuits. This study aims to report the planning and implementation of strategies to approach medicines litigation in a municipality located in the southeast region of Brazil. Mixed methods were employed through an action research cycle. A network coordination team included researchers from university and municipal managers. The scenario analysis comprised the characterization of pharmaceutical services and the profile of medicines lawsuits. Afterward, strategies were planned to deal with the central problem identified. The action plan involved educational outreach visits and distribution of printed materials for health professionals, evaluated through opinion survey. Group conversations were conducted with the users of the public health system, followed by thematic analysis of reports. The characterization of pharmaceutical services in the municipality revealed that treatments supplied were in accordance with the National Medicines Policy. In addition, a sector was implemented to attend demands for non-incorporated medicines. In spite of the services available, the characterization of lawsuits indicated that the main claimants were users of the public health system, requiring non-incorporated medicines, with therapeutic alternatives available. Thus, educational outreach visits were held in 14 health units (23 physicians in total). Everyone who answered the evaluation declared that they were very satisfied with the approach. Group conversations with the users of the health system reached 227 participants in total. In regard to users' perception about pharmaceutical services, thematic analysis of reports identified three main categories including aspects related to medicines provided, users assisted, and quality of service. The study described the first cycle of an action research project to develop strategies to approach medicines litigation at the municipal level. The application of educational outreach visits for health professionals and group conversations with health system users is a promising approach to improve access to information about pharmaceutical services in Brazil.

摘要

在过去几十年里,诉讼在巴西越来越多地被用于获取药品。这一现象促使人们制定了各种策略,以减少其对药品服务组织的负面影响。尽管如此,管理人员在处理诉讼时仍面临困难。本研究旨在报告在巴西东南部一个城市应对药品诉讼的策略规划与实施情况。通过行动研究循环采用了混合方法。一个网络协调团队包括来自大学的研究人员和市政管理人员。情景分析包括药品服务的特征描述和药品诉讼的概况。之后,针对所确定的核心问题制定了应对策略。行动计划包括对卫生专业人员进行教育外展访问并分发印刷材料,并通过意见调查进行评估。与公共卫生系统的用户进行了小组对话,随后对报告进行了主题分析。该市药品服务的特征描述显示,所提供的治疗符合国家药品政策。此外,还设立了一个部门来处理对未纳入医保的药品的需求。尽管有这些可用服务,但诉讼的特征表明,主要索赔人是公共卫生系统的用户,他们需要未纳入医保的药品,且有可用的治疗替代方案。因此,在14个卫生单位进行了教育外展访问(共有23名医生)。所有回答评估的人都表示对这种方式非常满意。与卫生系统用户的小组对话共有227名参与者。关于用户对药品服务的看法,报告的主题分析确定了三个主要类别,包括与所提供药品、所服务用户以及服务质量相关的方面。该研究描述了一个行动研究项目的第一个周期,该项目旨在制定市级应对药品诉讼的策略。对卫生专业人员进行教育外展访问以及与卫生系统用户进行小组对话,是改善巴西药品服务信息获取情况的一种有前景的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02e2/8100662/65c9c43243e7/fphar-12-612426-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02e2/8100662/3f400510a55d/fphar-12-612426-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02e2/8100662/39becad26212/fphar-12-612426-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02e2/8100662/65c9c43243e7/fphar-12-612426-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02e2/8100662/3f400510a55d/fphar-12-612426-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02e2/8100662/39becad26212/fphar-12-612426-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02e2/8100662/65c9c43243e7/fphar-12-612426-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Strategies to Approach Medicines Litigation: An Action Research Study in Brazil.应对药品诉讼的策略:巴西的一项行动研究
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 22;12:612426. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.612426. eCollection 2021.
2
Judicialization of access to medicines in four Latin American countries: a comparative qualitative analysis.四个拉丁美洲国家获取药品的司法化:比较定性分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0960-z.
3
Institutional strategies as a mechanism to rationalize the negative effects of the judicialization of access to medicine in Brazil.机构策略作为一种机制,以合理化巴西获得药物司法化的负面影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4929-9.
4
Between the court and the clinic: lawsuits for medicines and the right to health in Brazil.法庭与诊所之间:巴西的药品诉讼与健康权
Health Hum Rights. 2012 Jun 15;14(1):E36-52.
5
[Health litigation and new challenges in the management of pharmaceutical services].[医疗诉讼与药品服务管理中的新挑战]
Cien Saude Colet. 2010 Aug;15(5):2405-14. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232010000500015.
6
Administrative cases: an effective alternative to lawsuits in assuring access to medicines?行政案件:确保药品可及性的替代诉讼的有效途径?
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 20;19(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6529-3.
7
Judicialization of access to medicines in Minas Gerais state, Southeastern Brazil.巴西东南部米纳斯吉拉斯州药品可及性的司法化。
Rev Saude Publica. 2011 Jun;45(3):590-8. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102011005000015. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
8
Strategies Implemented by Public Institutions to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care in Brazil: A Systematic Scoping Review.巴西公共机构为推动医疗保健司法化所采取的策略:一项系统的范围综述
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jul 30;11:1128. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01128. eCollection 2020.
9
Right to health, essential medicines, and lawsuits for access to medicines--a scoping study.健康权、基本药物以及获取药物的诉讼——一项范围界定研究
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;121:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.042. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
10
[Judicialization of access to medicines: analysis of lawsuits in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil].[药品获取的司法化:对巴西北里奥格兰德州诉讼案件的分析]
Cad Saude Publica. 2021 Jan 11;37(1):e00174619. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00174619. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Litigation in access to universal health coverage for children and adolescents in Brazil.巴西争取普及儿童和青少年全民健康覆盖的诉讼活动。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 25;12:1402648. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1402648. eCollection 2024.
2
[Judicialization of cannabidiol-based products in Brazil: an analysis from 2019 to 2022].[巴西基于大麻二酚产品的司法化:2019年至2022年的分析]
Cad Saude Publica. 2023 Oct 9;39(8):e00024723. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT024723. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Judicialization of medicines: effectiveness of rights or break in public policies?医药的司法化:权利的有效性还是公共政策的断裂?
Rev Saude Publica. 2020 Dec 14;54:130. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002301. eCollection 2020.
2
Strategies Implemented by Public Institutions to Approach the Judicialization of Health Care in Brazil: A Systematic Scoping Review.巴西公共机构为推动医疗保健司法化所采取的策略:一项系统的范围综述
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jul 30;11:1128. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01128. eCollection 2020.
3
Changing prescribing behaviours with educational outreach: an overview of evidence and practice.
改变教育推广下的处方行为:证据和实践概述。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1735-3.
4
Comparison of essential medicines lists in 137 countries.137 个国家的基本药物清单比较。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Jun 1;97(6):394-404C. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.222448. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
5
Judicialization of access to medicines in four Latin American countries: a comparative qualitative analysis.四个拉丁美洲国家获取药品的司法化:比较定性分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0960-z.
6
Judicialization 2.0: Understanding right-to-health litigation in real time.司法化 2.0:实时理解健康权诉讼。
Glob Public Health. 2019 Feb;14(2):190-199. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1474483. Epub 2018 May 21.
7
Technical issues and conservation conditions of medicines in the primary health care of the Brazilian Unified Health System.巴西统一卫生系统初级卫生保健中的药品技术问题与保存条件
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Nov 13;51(suppl 2):12s. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051007106.
8
Management of pharmaceutical services in the Brazilian primary health care.巴西初级卫生保健中的药学服务管理
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Nov 13;51(suppl 2):15s. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051007063.
9
Policy Change and the National Essential Medicines List Development Process in Brazil between 2000 and 2014: Has the Essential Medicine Concept been Abandoned?政策变化与 2000 至 2014 年期间巴西国家基本药物目录的发展进程:基本药物理念是否被抛弃?
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018 Apr;122(4):402-412. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12932. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
10
Legal access to medications: a threat to Brazil's public health system?药品的合法获取:对巴西公共卫生系统的威胁?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 19;17(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2430-x.