• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Overview of EFSA and European national authorities' scientific opinions on the risk assessment of plants developed through New Genomic Techniques.欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)和欧洲各国当局关于新基因组技术培育植物风险评估的科学意见概述。
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 29;19(4):e06314. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6314. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Updated scientific opinion on plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesis.关于通过顺式基因工程和基因内工程培育的植物的最新科学意见。
EFSA J. 2022 Oct 20;20(10):e07621. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7621. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Scientific opinion on the ANSES analysis of Annex I of the EC proposal COM (2023) 411 (EFSA-Q-2024-00178).关于法国食品安全局对欧盟委员会提案COM(2023)411附件I的分析的科学意见(EFSA-Q-2024-00178)
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 11;22(7):e8894. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8894. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
New developments in biotechnology applied to microorganisms.应用于微生物的生物技术新进展。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 22;22(7):e8895. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8895. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Applicability of the EFSA Opinion on site-directed nucleases type 3 for the safety assessment of plants developed using site-directed nucleases type 1 and 2 and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis.欧洲食品安全局关于3型定点核酸酶对使用1型和2型定点核酸酶及寡核苷酸定向诱变技术培育的植物进行安全性评估的意见适用性。
EFSA J. 2020 Nov 24;18(11):e06299. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6299. eCollection 2020 Nov.
6
EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.欧洲食品安全局成立头十年在转基因生物风险评估方面的科学活动与成果:回顾与展望。
Transgenic Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11248-013-9741-4. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
7
Biosafety of Genome Editing Applications in Plant Breeding: Considerations for a Focused Case-Specific Risk Assessment in the EU.植物育种中基因组编辑应用的生物安全性:欧盟针对性具体案例风险评估的考量因素
BioTech (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;10(3):10. doi: 10.3390/biotech10030010.
8
Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2009-75) for placing on the market of genetically modified oilseed rape Ms8 × Rf3 × GT73 and subcombinations, which have not been authorised previously (i.e. Ms8 × GT73 and Rf3 × GT73) independently of their origin, for food and feed uses, import and processing, with the exception of isolated seed protein for food, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003), taking into consideration additional information.关于转基因油菜Ms8×Rf3×GT73及其亚组合(即Ms8×GT73和Rf3×GT73,无论其来源如何)投放市场的申请(EFSA-GMO-NL-2009-75)的声明,该申请涉及食品和饲料用途、进口和加工,但不包括用于食品的分离种子蛋白,根据(EC)No 1829/2003号法规,此前未获授权,考虑到额外信息。
EFSA J. 2020 Jul 30;18(7):e06200. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6200. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
A perspective from the EU: unintended genetic changes in plants caused by NGT-their relevance for a comprehensive molecular characterisation and risk assessment.来自欧盟的观点:新基因组技术导致植物中意外的基因变化——它们与全面分子特征分析和风险评估的相关性
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Oct 27;11:1276226. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1276226. eCollection 2023.
10
Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-DE-2011-95) for the placing on the market of genetically modified maize 5307 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Syngenta Crop Protection AG taking into consideration an additional toxicological study.关于先正达作物保护股份公司根据欧盟委员会第1829/2003号法规就转基因玉米5307用于食品、饲料、进口和加工的上市申请(EFSA-GMO-DE-2011-95)的声明补充,其中考虑了一项额外的毒理学研究。
EFSA J. 2018 Apr 11;16(4):e05233. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5233. eCollection 2018 Apr.

引用本文的文献

1
High-Pressure Processing of Different Tissue Homogenates from Pigs Challenged with the African Swine Fever Virus.对感染非洲猪瘟病毒的猪的不同组织匀浆进行高压处理
Viruses. 2024 Apr 19;16(4):638. doi: 10.3390/v16040638.
2
Dairy, Plant, and Novel Proteins: Scientific and Technological Aspects.乳制品、植物蛋白与新型蛋白质:科学与技术层面
Foods. 2024 Mar 26;13(7):1010. doi: 10.3390/foods13071010.
3
Bioengineered Enzymes and Precision Fermentation in the Food Industry.生物工程酶与食品工业的精准发酵。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 15;24(12):10156. doi: 10.3390/ijms241210156.
4
Recommendations for the Assessment of Potential Environmental Effects of Genome-Editing Applications in Plants in the EU.欧盟关于评估植物基因组编辑应用潜在环境影响的建议。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;12(9):1764. doi: 10.3390/plants12091764.
5
From Transgenesis to Genome Editing in Crop Improvement: Applications, Marketing, and Legal Issues.从转基因到作物改良的基因组编辑:应用、市场和法律问题。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 12;24(8):7122. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087122.
6
Japanese Regulatory Framework and Approach for Genome-edited Foods Based on Latest Scientific Findings.基于最新科学发现的日本基因编辑食品监管框架与方法
Food Saf (Tokyo). 2022 Dec 23;10(4):113-128. doi: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.D-21-00016. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Updated scientific opinion on plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesis.关于通过顺式基因工程和基因内工程培育的植物的最新科学意见。
EFSA J. 2022 Oct 20;20(10):e07621. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7621. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
A paired-end whole-genome sequencing approach enables comprehensive characterization of transgene integration in rice.采用双端全基因组测序方法能够全面描述水稻中转基因的整合情况。
Commun Biol. 2022 Jul 5;5(1):667. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03608-1.
9
The Intragenesis and Synthetic Biology Approach towards Accelerating Genetic Gains on Strawberry: Development of New Tools to Improve Fruit Quality and Resistance to Pathogens.通过基因内起源和合成生物学方法加速草莓遗传增益:开发改善果实品质和抗病性的新工具。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Dec 25;11(1):57. doi: 10.3390/plants11010057.
10
The Generic Risks and the Potential of SDN-1 Applications in Crop Plants.SDN-1在农作物中的一般风险及应用潜力
Plants (Basel). 2021 Oct 22;10(11):2259. doi: 10.3390/plants10112259.

本文引用的文献

1
Applicability of the EFSA Opinion on site-directed nucleases type 3 for the safety assessment of plants developed using site-directed nucleases type 1 and 2 and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis.欧洲食品安全局关于3型定点核酸酶对使用1型和2型定点核酸酶及寡核苷酸定向诱变技术培育的植物进行安全性评估的意见适用性。
EFSA J. 2020 Nov 24;18(11):e06299. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6299. eCollection 2020 Nov.
2
Induced Genetic Variation in Crop Plants by Random or Targeted Mutagenesis: Convergence and Differences.通过随机或定向诱变诱导作物植物的遗传变异:趋同与差异
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Nov 14;10:1468. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01468. eCollection 2019.

欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)和欧洲各国当局关于新基因组技术培育植物风险评估的科学意见概述。

Overview of EFSA and European national authorities' scientific opinions on the risk assessment of plants developed through New Genomic Techniques.

作者信息

Paraskevopoulos Konstantinos, Federici Silvia

出版信息

EFSA J. 2021 Apr 29;19(4):e06314. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6314. eCollection 2021 Apr.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6314
PMID:33968240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8083879/
Abstract

The European Commission requested EFSA to provide an overview on the risk assessment of plants developed through new genomic techniques (NGTs), taking into account its previous scientific opinions, its ongoing work on the topic as well as opinions published by competent authorities and national institutions since 2012, where available. In this report, NGTs are defined as techniques capable to change the genetic material of an organism and have emerged or developed since the adoption of the 2001 genetically modified organism (GMO) legislation. EFSA considered 16 scientific opinions issued by European member states ('MS opinions') as well as three EFSA GMO Panel scientific opinions on NGTs. A procurement to evaluate and summarise the MS opinions was conducted. Relevant information on the description of each NGT and information on the risk assessment of plants developed through one or a combination of the defined NGTs was extracted and summarised. The baseline for the types and nature of NGTs to be included in this report was defined based on the JRC, 2011 report on new plant breeding techniques as well as on the Explanatory Note on New Techniques in Agricultural Biotechnology from the European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety (EC-SAM, 2017) for some more recently developed NGTs, taking into account the NGT definition provided by the European Commission for this mandate. EFSA was not requested to develop new opinions on plants developed through specific NGTs, and thus, no critical appraisal of the reviewed scientific opinions was carried out.

摘要

欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)提供一份关于通过新基因组技术(NGTs)培育的植物的风险评估概述,同时考虑其先前的科学意见、正在进行的相关工作以及自2012年以来各主管当局和国家机构发表的意见(如有)。在本报告中,新基因组技术被定义为自2001年转基因生物(GMO)法规通过以来出现或发展起来的、能够改变生物体遗传物质的技术。欧洲食品安全局审议了欧洲成员国发布的16份科学意见(“成员国意见”)以及欧洲食品安全局转基因生物小组发布的3份关于新基因组技术的科学意见。开展了一项评估和总结成员国意见的采购活动。提取并总结了关于每种新基因组技术描述的相关信息以及通过一种或多种已定义的新基因组技术培育的植物的风险评估信息。本报告中纳入的新基因组技术的类型和性质的基准是根据欧盟联合研究中心(JRC)2011年关于新植物育种技术的报告以及欧洲卫生与食品安全专员发布的《农业生物技术新技术解释说明》(EC-SAM,2017)(针对一些较新开发的新基因组技术)确定的,同时考虑了欧盟委员会为该任务规定提供的新基因组技术定义。欧洲食品安全局未被要求就通过特定新基因组技术培育的植物形成新的意见,因此,未对所审查的科学意见进行批判性评估。