• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SDN-1在农作物中的一般风险及应用潜力

The Generic Risks and the Potential of SDN-1 Applications in Crop Plants.

作者信息

Kawall Katharina

机构信息

Fachstelle Gentechnik und Umwelt, Frohschammerstr. 14, 80807 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Plants (Basel). 2021 Oct 22;10(11):2259. doi: 10.3390/plants10112259.

DOI:10.3390/plants10112259
PMID:34834620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8622673/
Abstract

The use of site-directed nucleases (SDNs) in crop plants to alter market-oriented traits is expanding rapidly. At the same time, there is an on-going debate around the safety and regulation of crops altered with the site-directed nuclease 1 (SDN-1) technology. SDN-1 applications can be used to induce a variety of genetic alterations ranging from fairly 'simple' genetic alterations to complex changes in plant genomes using, for example, multiplexing approaches. The resulting plants can contain modified alleles and associated traits, which are either known or unknown in conventionally bred plants. The European Commission recently published a study on new genomic techniques suggesting an adaption of the current GMO legislation by emphasizing that targeted mutagenesis techniques can produce genomic alterations that can also be obtained by natural mutations or conventional breeding techniques. This review highlights the need for a case-specific risk assessment of crop plants derived from SDN-1 applications considering both the characteristics of the product and the process to ensure a high level of protection of human and animal health and the environment. The published literature on so-called market-oriented traits in crop plants altered with SDN-1 applications is analyzed here to determine the types of SDN-1 application in plants, and to reflect upon the complexity and the naturalness of such products. Furthermore, it demonstrates the potential of SDN-1 applications to induce complex alterations in plant genomes that are relevant to generic SDN-associated risks. In summary, it was found that nearly half of plants with so-called market-oriented traits contain complex genomic alterations induced by SDN-1 applications, which may also pose new types of risks. It further underscores the need for data on both the process and the end-product for a case-by-case risk assessment of plants derived from SDN-1 applications.

摘要

在农作物中使用定点核酸酶(SDN)来改变面向市场的性状的情况正在迅速增加。与此同时,围绕定点核酸酶1(SDN-1)技术改造作物的安全性和监管问题的辩论仍在进行。SDN-1的应用可用于诱导多种基因改变,范围从相当“简单”的基因改变到使用例如多重化方法对植物基因组进行的复杂改变。由此产生的植物可能含有修饰的等位基因和相关性状,这些在传统培育的植物中是已知或未知的。欧盟委员会最近发表了一项关于新基因组技术的研究,建议调整当前的转基因生物立法,强调靶向诱变技术可以产生也可通过自然突变或传统育种技术获得的基因组改变。本综述强调,对于来自SDN-1应用的作物,需要根据具体情况进行风险评估,同时考虑产品和过程的特征,以确保对人类、动物健康和环境的高水平保护。本文分析了关于用SDN-1应用改造的作物中所谓面向市场性状的已发表文献,以确定植物中SDN-1应用的类型,并思考此类产品的复杂性和自然性。此外,它展示了SDN-1应用诱导与一般SDN相关风险相关的植物基因组复杂改变的潜力。总之,发现近一半具有所谓面向市场性状的植物含有由SDN-1应用诱导的复杂基因组改变,这也可能带来新型风险。它进一步强调了对于来自SDN-1应用的植物进行逐案风险评估时,需要有关过程和最终产品的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c31/8622673/a6ef35462915/plants-10-02259-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c31/8622673/1ba840a1690c/plants-10-02259-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c31/8622673/3fcf1553fcca/plants-10-02259-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c31/8622673/a6ef35462915/plants-10-02259-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c31/8622673/1ba840a1690c/plants-10-02259-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c31/8622673/3fcf1553fcca/plants-10-02259-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c31/8622673/a6ef35462915/plants-10-02259-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Generic Risks and the Potential of SDN-1 Applications in Crop Plants.SDN-1在农作物中的一般风险及应用潜力
Plants (Basel). 2021 Oct 22;10(11):2259. doi: 10.3390/plants10112259.
2
Applicability of the EFSA Opinion on site-directed nucleases type 3 for the safety assessment of plants developed using site-directed nucleases type 1 and 2 and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis.欧洲食品安全局关于3型定点核酸酶对使用1型和2型定点核酸酶及寡核苷酸定向诱变技术培育的植物进行安全性评估的意见适用性。
EFSA J. 2020 Nov 24;18(11):e06299. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6299. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
From classical mutagenesis to nuclease-based breeding - directing natural DNA repair for a natural end-product.从经典诱变到基于核酸酶的育种——引导天然DNA修复以获得天然终产物。
Plant J. 2017 May;90(4):819-833. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13469. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
4
Genome editing for crop improvement: Challenges and opportunities.作物改良的基因组编辑:挑战与机遇。
GM Crops Food. 2015;6(4):183-205. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1129937.
5
New traits in crops produced by genome editing techniques based on deletions.基于缺失的基因组编辑技术所产生的作物新性状。
Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2017;11(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s11816-017-0425-z. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
6
Targeted modification of plant genomes for precision crop breeding.用于精准作物育种的植物基因组靶向修饰。
Biotechnol J. 2017 Jan;12(1). doi: 10.1002/biot.201600173. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
7
Progress in gene editing tools, implications and success in plants: a review.植物基因编辑工具的进展、影响及成功案例综述
Front Genome Ed. 2023 Dec 7;5:1272678. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2023.1272678. eCollection 2023.
8
Plant Genome Editing and the Relevance of Off-Target Changes.植物基因组编辑与脱靶变化的相关性。
Plant Physiol. 2020 Aug;183(4):1453-1471. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.01194. Epub 2020 May 26.
9
Current status and prospects of plant genome editing in Australia.澳大利亚植物基因组编辑的现状与前景
In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2021;57(4):574-583. doi: 10.1007/s11627-021-10188-y. Epub 2021 May 24.
10
Enhancing the quality of staple food crops through CRISPR/Cas-mediated site-directed mutagenesis.通过 CRISPR/Cas 介导的定点突变技术提高主食作物的品质。
Planta. 2023 Mar 13;257(4):78. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04110-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive approaches to design efficient gRNA for SDN1-CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in wheat.用于小麦中SDN1-CRISPR/Cas9基因组编辑的高效gRNA设计的综合方法。
Front Genome Ed. 2025 Jul 1;7:1579165. doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2025.1579165. eCollection 2025.
2
Harnessing the plant microbiome for sustainable crop production.利用植物微生物组实现作物可持续生产。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2025 Jan;23(1):9-23. doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01079-1. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
Adoption of CRISPR-Cas for crop production: present status and future prospects.

本文引用的文献

1
Biosafety of Genome Editing Applications in Plant Breeding: Considerations for a Focused Case-Specific Risk Assessment in the EU.植物育种中基因组编辑应用的生物安全性:欧盟针对性具体案例风险评估的考量因素
BioTech (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;10(3):10. doi: 10.3390/biotech10030010.
2
Cas9-induced large deletions and small indels are controlled in a convergent fashion.Cas9 诱导的大片段缺失和小片段插入以收敛的方式被控制。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 14;13(1):3422. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30480-8.
3
Global detection of DNA repair outcomes induced by CRISPR-Cas9.
采用 CRISPR-Cas 技术进行作物生产:现状与展望。
PeerJ. 2024 Jun 7;12:e17402. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17402. eCollection 2024.
4
A perspective from the EU: unintended genetic changes in plants caused by NGT-their relevance for a comprehensive molecular characterisation and risk assessment.来自欧盟的观点:新基因组技术导致植物中意外的基因变化——它们与全面分子特征分析和风险评估的相关性
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Oct 27;11:1276226. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1276226. eCollection 2023.
5
Dissection of the epoxyjanthitrem pathway in sp. TG-3 strain AR37 by CRISPR gene editing.通过CRISPR基因编辑解析sp. TG-3菌株AR37中的环氧简丝震颤素途径。
Front Fungal Biol. 2022 Aug 10;3:944234. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2022.944234. eCollection 2022.
6
Recommendations for the Assessment of Potential Environmental Effects of Genome-Editing Applications in Plants in the EU.欧盟关于评估植物基因组编辑应用潜在环境影响的建议。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;12(9):1764. doi: 10.3390/plants12091764.
CRISPR-Cas9 诱导的 DNA 修复结果的全球检测
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Sep 7;49(15):8732-8742. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab686.
4
Overview of EFSA and European national authorities' scientific opinions on the risk assessment of plants developed through New Genomic Techniques.欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)和欧洲各国当局关于新基因组技术培育植物风险评估的科学意见概述。
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 29;19(4):e06314. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6314. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.染色体重排是 CRISPR-Cas9 基因组编辑的一种靶向后果。
Nat Genet. 2021 Jun;53(6):895-905. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00838-7. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
6
Evaluation of existing guidelines for their adequacy for the molecular characterisation and environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants obtained through synthetic biology.评估现有指南对于通过合成生物学获得的转基因植物进行分子特征描述和环境风险评估的充分性。
EFSA J. 2021 Feb 5;19(2):e06301. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6301. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
A route to de novo domestication of wild allotetraploid rice.一条从头驯化野生异源四倍体水稻的途径。
Cell. 2021 Mar 4;184(5):1156-1170.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
Hotter, drier, CRISPR: the latest edit on climate change.更热、更干燥、CRISPR:气候变化的最新编辑。
Theor Appl Genet. 2021 Jun;134(6):1691-1709. doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03764-0. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
9
How the pan-genome is changing crop genomics and improvement.泛基因组如何改变作物基因组学和改良。
Genome Biol. 2021 Jan 4;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02224-8.
10
Applicability of the EFSA Opinion on site-directed nucleases type 3 for the safety assessment of plants developed using site-directed nucleases type 1 and 2 and oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis.欧洲食品安全局关于3型定点核酸酶对使用1型和2型定点核酸酶及寡核苷酸定向诱变技术培育的植物进行安全性评估的意见适用性。
EFSA J. 2020 Nov 24;18(11):e06299. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6299. eCollection 2020 Nov.