Lurvink Robin J, Van der Speeten Kurt, Rovers Koen P, de Hingh Ignace H J T
Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Hospital Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Apr;12(Suppl 1):S259-S270. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-497.
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is an emerging palliative treatment for patients with unresectable peritoneal metastases. Potential advantages of PIPAC over current treatment options are a homogeneous intraperitoneal distribution, low local and systemic toxicity, and enhanced tumour penetration. Given these possible benefits, PIPAC is increasingly implemented in many centres worldwide. Scientific research into PIPAC is currently available from //in animal studies, retrospective cohorts in humans, and phase I and II studies in humans. There are no results from randomised trials comparing PIPAC with conventional treatment, such as palliative systemic therapy. This narrative review aimed to provide an overview of the currently available literature on PIPAC. In general, repetitive PIPAC was feasible and safe for patients and operating room personnel. Primary and secondary non-access rates varied from 0-17% and 0-15%, respectively. Iatrogenic bowel injury was observed in 0-3% of PIPAC procedures. CTCAE grade 1-2 complications were common, mostly consisting of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. CTCAE grade 3-4 complications were uncommon, occurring on 0-15% of PIPAC procedures. Post-operative mortality rates of 0-2% were reported. The risk of occupational exposure to cytotoxic drugs was very low when strict safety guidelines were followed. Clinical heterogeneity was high in most studies, since, in general, patients with unresectable peritoneal metastases from a variety of primary tumours were included. Also, patients received either PIPAC monotherapy or PIPAC combined with concomitant systemic therapy, and were able to receive PIPAC in any line of palliative treatment. Since the results were generally not stratified for these three important factors, this severely complicates the interpretation of results. Based on the current literature, PIPAC may be regarded as a promising palliative treatment option in patients with diffuse peritoneal metastases. Initial results show that it is feasible and safe. However, well designed and (ideally) randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to determine the additional value of PIPAC in this setting. Until then, PIPAC should preferably be performed in the setting of clinical trials.
腹腔内加压气雾化疗(PIPAC)是一种针对不可切除腹膜转移患者的新兴姑息治疗方法。与当前治疗方案相比,PIPAC的潜在优势在于腹腔内分布均匀、局部和全身毒性低以及肿瘤穿透性增强。鉴于这些可能的益处,PIPAC在全球许多中心越来越多地得到应用。目前关于PIPAC的科学研究可见于动物研究、人类回顾性队列研究以及人类I期和II期研究。尚无将PIPAC与传统治疗(如姑息性全身治疗)进行比较的随机试验结果。本叙述性综述旨在概述目前关于PIPAC的现有文献。总体而言,重复进行PIPAC对患者和手术室人员是可行且安全的。初次和二次非进入率分别在0 - 17%和0 - 15%之间。在0 - 3%的PIPAC手术中观察到医源性肠损伤。CTCAE 1 - 2级并发症很常见,主要包括腹痛、恶心、呕吐和疲劳。CTCAE 3 - 4级并发症不常见,在0 - 15%的PIPAC手术中出现。报告的术后死亡率为0 - 2%。遵循严格的安全指南时,职业接触细胞毒性药物的风险非常低。大多数研究中的临床异质性较高,因为一般纳入了来自各种原发性肿瘤的不可切除腹膜转移患者。此外,患者接受PIPAC单药治疗或PIPAC联合同期全身治疗,并且能够在任何姑息治疗阶段接受PIPAC。由于结果通常未针对这三个重要因素进行分层,这严重妨碍了对结果的解读。基于当前文献,PIPAC可被视为弥漫性腹膜转移患者一种有前景的姑息治疗选择。初步结果表明其可行且安全。然而,迫切需要设计良好且(理想情况下)为随机对照的试验来确定PIPAC在此情况下的附加价值。在此之前,PIPAC最好在临床试验环境中进行。