Botelho Renata Maria de Oliveira, Campanharo Cássia Regina Vancini, Lopes Maria Carolina Barbosa Teixeira, Okuno Meiry Fernanda Pinto, Góis Aécio Flávio Teixeira de, Batista Ruth Ester Assayag
Urgency and emergency care services specialist, RN, Hospital Universitário, Univesidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
MSc, RN, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Nov 21;24:e2829. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1294.2829.
to compare the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and death after cardiac arrest, with and without the use of a metronome during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
case-control study nested in a cohort study including 285 adults who experienced cardiac arrest and received CPR in an emergency service. Data were collected using In-hospital Utstein Style. The control group (n=60) was selected by matching patients considering their neurological condition before cardiac arrest, the immediate cause, initial arrest rhythm, whether epinephrine was used, and the duration of CPR. The case group (n=51) received conventional CPR guided by a metronome set at 110 beats/min. Chi-square and likelihood ratio were used to compare ROSC rates considering p≤0.05.
ROSC occurred in 57.7% of the cases, though 92.8% of these patients died in the following 24 hours. No statistically significant difference was found between groups in regard to ROSC (p=0.2017) or the occurrence of death (p=0.8112).
the outcomes of patients after cardiac arrest with and without the use of a metronome during CPR were similar and no differences were found between groups in regard to survival rates and ROSC.
比较在心肺复苏(CPR)过程中使用节拍器与不使用节拍器时心脏骤停后自主循环恢复(ROSC)率和死亡率。
在一项队列研究中进行病例对照研究,该队列研究纳入了285名在急诊服务中发生心脏骤停并接受CPR的成年人。使用院内Utstein模式收集数据。对照组(n = 60)通过匹配患者来选择,匹配因素包括心脏骤停前的神经状况、直接病因、初始骤停节律、是否使用肾上腺素以及CPR持续时间。病例组(n = 51)接受由设置为110次/分钟的节拍器指导的传统CPR。考虑p≤0.05,使用卡方检验和似然比来比较ROSC率。
57.7%的病例出现了ROSC,不过这些患者中有92.8%在接下来的24小时内死亡。在ROSC方面(p = 0.2017)或死亡发生率方面(p = 0.8112),两组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。
CPR过程中使用节拍器与不使用节拍器的心脏骤停患者的结局相似,两组在生存率和ROSC方面未发现差异。