Suppr超能文献

SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测:快速安全还是危险?大学附属医院急诊科分析。

SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: Fast-safe or dangerous? An analysis in the emergency department of an university hospital.

机构信息

Center for Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Institute for Virology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 2021 Sep;93(9):5323-5327. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27033. Epub 2021 May 9.

Abstract

The use of Antigen point of care tests (AgPOCT) might be an essential tool to fight the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Manufacturer information indicates a specificity of about 95% and there is a growing interest to use these tests area-wide. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify whether AgPOCT can be used safely for "rule-in" (detection of positive patients) and for "rule-out" (valid negative testing). Two thousand three hundred and seventy-five patients received polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing and AgPOCT for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) regardless of symptoms. The positive predictive value of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients was compared with a cut-off threshold cycle (C ) value of ≤30 and in total. Five hundrded and fifty-one patients tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus by PCR, of whom 35.2% presented without symptoms. In all patients, regardless of their symptoms or C values, a sensitivity of 68.9% and a specificity of 99.6% were calculated for AgPOCT. In patients with C values ≤30, a sensitivity of 80.5% (95% confidence interval: ±1.62) and a specificity of 99.6% were shown for all tests (symptomatic/asymptomatic). Highly infectious patients (C  ≤ 20), regardless of symptoms, were reliably detected by the AgPOCT. In infectious patients with C values ≤30, the test has a sensitivity of about 80% regardless of COVID-19 typical symptoms, which is apparently less than the 96.52% specificity indicated by the manufacturer. Relevant improvement in test sensitivity by querying the patients who are symptomatic and asymptomatic is also not feasible. We strongly suggest that we critically question the use of AgPOCT for "rule-out," as they only provide a supposed safety.

摘要

即时抗原检测(AgPOCT)可能是对抗 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的重要工具。制造商的信息表明其特异性约为 95%,并且越来越有兴趣在广泛的区域使用这些测试。因此,有必要澄清 AgPOCT 是否可安全用于“阳性纳入”(检测阳性患者)和“阴性排除”(有效阴性检测)。

2375 例患者接受了聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测和严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的即时抗原检测,无论症状如何。比较了有症状和无症状患者的阳性预测值与截止循环(C )值≤30 的值和总值。

551 例患者通过 PCR 检测对 SARS-CoV-2 病毒呈阳性,其中 35.2%无症状。在所有患者中,无论其症状或 C 值如何,AgPOCT 的敏感性均为 68.9%,特异性均为 99.6%。在 C 值≤30 的患者中,所有测试(有症状/无症状)的敏感性为 80.5%(95%置信区间:±1.62),特异性为 99.6%。

高传染性患者(C  ≤ 20),无论有无症状,均可通过 AgPOCT 可靠地检测到。在 C 值≤30 的传染性患者中,无论 COVID-19 典型症状如何,该测试的敏感性约为 80%,明显低于制造商所指出的 96.52%特异性。通过查询有症状和无症状患者来提高测试敏感性也是不可行的。

我们强烈建议,我们需要批判性地质疑 AgPOCT 在“阴性排除”中的应用,因为它们仅提供所谓的安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c32/8242658/1f1da35a2c9b/JMV-93-5323-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验