Suppr超能文献

急诊科和社区中快速抗原检测用于检测SARS-CoV-2感染的临床性能:一项回顾性研究

Clinical Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department and Community: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Lin Pei-Chin, Chiu Hung-Pin, Cheng Fang-Yi, Chang Chih-Chun, Chu Fang-Yeh

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pathology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Department of Nursing, Cardinal Tien Junior College of Healthcare and Management, Yilan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2022 Oct 6;2022:9447251. doi: 10.1155/2022/9447251. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rapid antigen tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection have been authorized for emergency use (EUA); however, the performance has not been fully evaluated in clinical contexts. This study aimed to provide evidence regarding the diagnostic performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests compared with the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test in the emergency department (ED) and community.

METHODS

Patients who underwent SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests using the VTRUST COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (TD-4531) and real-time RT-PCR on the same day in the ED or community from May 24, 2021, to June 24, 2021, were examined.

RESULTS

Paired nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 4022 suspected COVID-19 patients: 800 in the ED and 3222 in the community. Overall, 62 (1.54%) tested positive, 13 tested indeterminate, and 3947 tested negative by real-time RT-PCR. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were 51.61% and 99.44% (overall), 62.50% and 99.61% (ED), and 31.82% and 99.40% (community), respectively. There were 30 false negatives and 22 false positives. Among the false negatives, 16.67% had a cycle threshold (Ct) value of <25.

CONCLUSION

The VTRUST COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test showed comparable specificity as real-time RT-PCR for the ED and community, but the sensitivity was relatively low, especially when the Ct value was >25. This test can be useful for the rapid identification of infected subjects in an epidemic situation.

摘要

背景

用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的快速抗原检测已被批准用于紧急使用(EUA);然而,其性能尚未在临床环境中得到充分评估。本研究旨在提供证据,比较SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测与急诊科(ED)和社区中的实时逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测的诊断性能。

方法

对2021年5月24日至2021年6月24日在急诊科或社区同一天接受使用VTRUST COVID-19抗原快速检测(TD-4531)进行SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测和实时RT-PCR检测的患者进行检查。

结果

从4022名疑似COVID-19患者中采集了配对的鼻咽拭子:急诊科800例,社区3222例。总体而言,实时RT-PCR检测结果为62例(1.54%)呈阳性,13例结果不确定,3947例呈阴性。抗原检测的敏感性和特异性分别为51.61%和99.44%(总体)、62.50%和99.61%(急诊科)以及31.82%和99.40%(社区)。有30例假阴性和22例假阳性。在假阴性中,16.67%的循环阈值(Ct)值<25。

结论

VTRUST COVID-19抗原快速检测在急诊科和社区中显示出与实时RT-PCR相当的特异性,但敏感性相对较低,尤其是当Ct值>25时。该检测对于在疫情情况下快速识别感染个体可能有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2978/9560843/d5542bb8cf81/CJIDMM2022-9447251.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验