Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
School of Education, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Br J Sociol. 2021 Jun;72(3):672-692. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12856. Epub 2021 May 10.
We explore the influence of between-school ability placement at lower secondary education on earnings across the life course in England and Denmark. We go beyond the mid-career snapshot provided by previous studies by exploiting the availability of four decades worth of earnings data for individuals born in the mid-1950s. Members of this cohort who were judged to be among the most academically able attended grammar schools in England (19%) and advanced secondary schools (Realskole) in Denmark (51%) prior to the start of comprehensivization. This key difference makes England and Denmark interesting cases for comparison, not least since pro-selection policies have re-emerged in England based on the claim that grammar schools lead to better educational and labor market outcomes. Our analysis of the influence of selective school placement on earnings finds little support for this contention. We find that those from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds were strikingly under-represented in schools ear-marked for higher ability pupils in both countries, even after taking into account social class differences in measured ability. Our analysis for England finds only modest earnings returns to attending a grammar school, totalling just £39,000 across the life course, while in Denmark the lifetime earnings returns to attending Realskole are somewhat larger (£194,000). Because those from advantaged backgrounds were substantially over-represented at grammar schools and Realskoles, these returns accrue disproportionately to pupils from more advantaged backgrounds. Lower secondary school placement in Denmark accounts for 40% of the intergenerational reproduction of socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage, more than half of which is due to selection into school types based on socioeconomic background rather than measured ability. Our findings question the wisdom of expanding grammar schools when they appear to do little to improve individuals' earnings or increase social mobility.
我们探讨了英国和丹麦中学教育中按能力分班对个人一生收入的影响。我们利用 20 世纪 50 年代中期出生的个人 40 多年的收入数据,超越了之前研究中仅提供职业生涯中期快照的局限。在综合学校出现之前,被认为是最有学术能力的这群人中,19%的人就读于英国的文法学校,51%的人就读于丹麦的高级中学(Realskole)。这种关键差异使得英国和丹麦成为比较有趣的案例,尤其是因为基于文法学校能带来更好的教育和劳动力市场结果的主张,在英国重新出现了支持选择的政策。我们对选择性学校安置对收入的影响的分析几乎没有支持这种说法。我们发现,来自社会经济劣势背景的学生在两国中都明显代表不足,即使在考虑到衡量能力方面的社会阶层差异之后也是如此。我们对英国的分析发现,就读文法学校的收入回报只有适度,一生中总计只有 39,000 英镑,而在丹麦,就读 Realskole 的终身收入回报则略高一些(194,000 英镑)。由于来自优势背景的学生在文法学校和 Realskoles 中所占比例过高,因此这些回报不成比例地流向了来自更有优势背景的学生。丹麦的中学入学分班制度导致了 40%的社会经济优势和劣势的代际传承,其中一半以上归因于根据社会经济背景而非衡量能力选择学校类型。我们的研究结果对扩大文法学校的做法提出了质疑,因为文法学校似乎对提高个人收入或增加社会流动性没有多大帮助。