Zhao Renee T, Medina Giovanna, Chen Eric T, Oh Luke S
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2022 Apr;62(4):517-524. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.21.12175-9. Epub 2021 May 10.
Injury patterns are well-documented for taekwondo competitions prior to the use of an electronic chest protector for scoring tabulation. To see if injury rates and types changed following this rule change that transformed the fighting style in taekwondo, we investigated injuries in collegiate taekwondo competitions in the USA.
Data were collected at eight collegiate taekwondo tournaments from April 2018 to December 2019. All injured athletes seen at the first-aid station were invited to complete a survey that included injury location, type, and mechanism of injury. Injury rates were calculated per 1000 athlete-exposures (A-Es) and minute-exposures (M-Es). Risk factors were modeled using logistic regression and χ analysis.
Out of 1096 athletes, 194 athletes reported 275 acute injuries. We found an injury risk of 17.7/100 athletes (95% CI: 15.4, 20.0) and injury rate of 68.9/1000 A-E (95% CI: 60.7, 77.0) which was comparable to previous studies. The most common injuries were contusions to the lower limbs. In contrast to prior reports, men were injured more frequently from delivering a kick and women from receiving a kick. Populations at higher risk for injury included those with low belt rank and middle weight class for women.
It appears that the new fighting style did not affect injury rates. Injury locations and types remain similar, but the mechanisms of injury have reversed as men are more injured from attacking and women from defending. There remains a strong need for research to improve protective equipment and safety rules in taekwondo.
在使用电子护胸进行计分之前,跆拳道比赛中的受伤模式已有详尽记录。为了解这项改变跆拳道比赛风格的规则变化后受伤率和受伤类型是否发生改变,我们对美国大学生跆拳道比赛中的受伤情况进行了调查。
收集了2018年4月至2019年12月期间八场大学生跆拳道比赛的数据。所有在急救站就诊的受伤运动员都被邀请完成一项调查,内容包括受伤部位、类型和受伤机制。受伤率按每1000运动员暴露次数(A-Es)和每分钟暴露次数(M-Es)计算。使用逻辑回归和χ分析对风险因素进行建模。
在1096名运动员中,194名运动员报告了275起急性损伤。我们发现受伤风险为17.7/100运动员(95%置信区间:15.4,20.0),受伤率为68.9/1000 A-E(95%置信区间:60.7,77.0),这与之前的研究相当。最常见的损伤是下肢挫伤。与之前的报告不同,男性因踢击受伤的频率更高,而女性因被踢受伤的频率更高。受伤风险较高的人群包括腰带等级较低的人和女性中等体重级别的人。
新的比赛风格似乎并未影响受伤率。受伤部位和类型仍然相似,但受伤机制发生了逆转,男性因攻击受伤更多,女性因防守受伤更多。仍然非常需要开展研究以改进跆拳道的防护装备和安全规则。