Suppr超能文献

美国大学生体育协会美式足球项目中人工草皮与天然草皮的膝盖损伤发生率:2004-2005 赛季至 2013-2014 赛季。

Incidence of Knee Injuries on Artificial Turf Versus Natural Grass in National Collegiate Athletic Association American Football: 2004-2005 Through 2013-2014 Seasons.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1294-1301. doi: 10.1177/0363546519833925. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of artificial turf in American football continues to grow in popularity, and the effect of these playing surfaces on athletic injuries remains controversial. Knee injuries account for a significant portion of injuries in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football league; however, the effect of artificial surfaces on knee injuries remains ill-defined.

HYPOTHESIS

There is no difference in the rate or mechanism of knee ligament and meniscal injuries during NCAA football events on natural grass and artificial turf playing surfaces.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive epidemiology study.

METHODS

The NCAA Injury Surveillance System Men's Football Injury and Exposure Data Sets for the 2004-2005 through 2013-2014 seasons were analyzed to determine the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medial collateral ligament (MCL), medial meniscus, and lateral meniscal tear injuries. Injury rates were calculated per 10,000 athlete exposures, and rate ratios (RRs) were used to compare injury rates during practices and competitions on natural grass and artificial turf in NCAA football as a whole and by competition level (Divisions I, Divisions II and III). Mechanisms of injury were calculated for each injury on natural grass and artificial turf surfaces.

RESULTS

A total of 3,009,205 athlete exposures and 2460 knee injuries were reported from 2004 to 2014: 1389 MCL, 522 ACL, 269 lateral meniscal, 164 medial meniscal, and 116 PCL. Athletes experienced all knee injuries at a significantly higher rate when participating in competitions as compared with practices. Athletes participating in competitions on artificial turf experienced PCL injuries at 2.94 times the rate as those playing on grass (RR = 2.94; 95% CI, 1.61-5.68). When stratified by competition level, Division I athletes participating in competitions on artificial turf experienced PCL injuries at 2.99 times the rate as those playing on grass (RR = 2.99; 95% CI, 1.39-6.99), and athletes in lower NCAA divisions (II and III) experienced ACL injuries at 1.63 times the rate (RR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.10-2.45) and PCL injuries at 3.13 times the rate (RR = 3.13; 95% CI, 1.14-10.69) on artificial turf as compared with grass. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of MCL, medial meniscal, or lateral meniscal injuries on artificial turf versus grass when stratified by event type or level of NCAA competition. No difference was found in the mechanisms of knee injuries on natural grass and artificial turf.

CONCLUSION

Artificial turf is an important risk factor for specific knee ligament injuries in NCAA football. Injury rates for PCL tears were significantly increased during competitions played on artificial turf as compared with natural grass. Lower NCAA divisions (II and III) also showed higher rates of ACL injuries during competitions on artificial turf versus natural grass.

摘要

背景

在美国足球中,人工草皮的使用越来越受欢迎,但其对运动员受伤的影响仍存在争议。在全国大学生体育协会(NCAA)足球联赛中,膝关节损伤占很大一部分;然而,人工草皮对膝关节损伤的影响仍不明确。

假设

在 NCAA 足球比赛中,天然草皮和人工草皮表面的前交叉韧带(ACL)、后交叉韧带(PCL)、内侧副韧带(MCL)、内侧半月板和外侧半月板撕裂伤的发生率或机制没有差异。

研究设计

描述性流行病学研究。

方法

分析 2004-2005 至 2013-2014 赛季 NCAA 男子足球损伤和暴露数据集中的 NCAA 损伤监测系统男子足球损伤和暴露数据集,以确定前交叉韧带(ACL)、后交叉韧带(PCL)、内侧副韧带(MCL)、内侧半月板和外侧半月板撕裂伤的发生率。损伤率按每 10000 名运动员暴露计算,并用比率比(RR)比较 NCAA 足球整体和各级别(I 级、II 级和 III 级)比赛中练习和比赛中在天然草皮和人工草皮上的损伤率。对天然草皮和人工草皮表面的每个损伤进行损伤机制计算。

结果

2004 年至 2014 年共报告了 3009205 名运动员暴露和 2460 例膝关节损伤:1389 例 MCL、522 例 ACL、269 例外侧半月板、164 例内侧半月板和 116 例 PCL。与练习相比,运动员在参加比赛时会以更高的速度经历所有膝关节损伤。与在草地上比赛相比,在人工草皮上比赛的运动员的 PCL 损伤率高出 2.94 倍(RR = 2.94;95%CI,1.61-5.68)。按比赛级别分层时,在人工草皮上比赛的 I 级运动员的 PCL 损伤率高出 2.99 倍(RR = 2.99;95%CI,1.39-6.99),而 NCAA 较低级别(II 和 III)的运动员的 ACL 损伤率高出 1.63 倍(RR = 1.63;95%CI,1.10-2.45)和 PCL 损伤率高出 3.13 倍(RR = 3.13;95%CI,1.14-10.69)在人工草皮上与草地上相比。按比赛类型或 NCAA 比赛级别分层,人工草皮上 MCL、内侧半月板或外侧半月板损伤的发生率没有统计学意义。在天然草皮和人工草皮上,膝关节损伤的机制没有差异。

结论

人工草皮是 NCAA 足球中特定膝关节韧带损伤的一个重要危险因素。与天然草皮相比,在人工草皮上进行的比赛中 PCL 撕裂伤的发生率显著增加。较低级别的 NCAA(第二和第三级)在人工草皮上的比赛中,ACL 损伤的发生率也高于天然草皮。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验