Suppr超能文献

引入兴趣点作为注视持续时间分析的兴趣区替代方法。

Introducing Point-of-Interest as an alternative to Area-of-Interest for fixation duration analysis.

机构信息

Masters in Computational Social Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 10;16(5):e0250170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250170. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Many eye-tracking data analyses rely on the Area-of-Interest (AOI) methodology, which utilizes AOIs to analyze metrics such as fixations. However, AOI-based methods have some inherent limitations including variability and subjectivity in shape, size, and location of AOIs. In this article, we propose an alternative approach to the traditional AOI dwell time analysis: Weighted Sum Durations (WSD). This approach decreases the subjectivity of AOI definitions by using Points-of-Interest (POI) while maintaining interpretability. In WSD, the durations of fixations toward each POI is weighted by the distance from the POI and summed together to generate a metric comparable to AOI dwell time. To validate WSD, we reanalyzed data from a previously published eye-tracking study (n = 90). The re-analysis replicated the original findings that people gaze less towards faces and more toward points of contact when viewing violent social interactions.

摘要

许多眼动追踪数据分析都依赖于兴趣区域(AOI)方法,该方法利用 AOI 来分析注视等指标。然而,基于 AOI 的方法存在一些固有局限性,包括 AOI 的形状、大小和位置的可变性和主观性。在本文中,我们提出了一种替代传统 AOI 停留时间分析的方法:加权和持续时间(WSD)。这种方法通过使用兴趣点(POI)减少了 AOI 定义的主观性,同时保持了可解释性。在 WSD 中,每个 POI 的注视持续时间通过与 POI 的距离进行加权,并将其加总在一起,生成与 AOI 停留时间可比的度量。为了验证 WSD,我们重新分析了先前发表的眼动追踪研究(n=90)的数据。重新分析复制了原始发现,即当人们观看暴力社交互动时,他们会更少地注视面部,更多地注视接触点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e06b/8109773/b45e72217494/pone.0250170.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验