• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

记错英国脱欧:英国脱欧选民对假新闻故事产生虚假记忆的党派偏见和个体预测因素。

Misremembering Brexit: partisan bias and individual predictors of false memories for fake news stories among Brexit voters.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Memory. 2021 May;29(5):587-604. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1923754. Epub 2021 May 10.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2021.1923754
PMID:33971789
Abstract

Exposure to fake news stories can result in false memories for the events portrayed, and this effect can be enhanced if the stories conform to the reader's ideological position. We exposed 1299 UK residents to fabricated news stories about Brexit. 44% of participants reported a false memory for at least one fabricated story, with a higher rate of false memories for stories that reflected poorly on the opposing side. This effect of ideological congruency was somewhat greater among participants who were exposed to a threat to their social identity as a Leave or Remain supporter; however, this moderating effect was only statistically significant in exploratory analyses using a more conservative definition of false memory. Participants with higher cognitive ability and analytical reasoning scores were less susceptible to false memories. Individuals with better knowledge about Brexit showed better discrimination between true and false stories, while self-reported engagement with the Brexit debate was associated with an increased tendency to "remember" any story, regardless of its truth. These results implicate a combination of social and individual factors in the development of false memories from fake news, and suggest that exposure to social identity threats may enhance the polarising effects of fake news.

摘要

接触虚假新闻故事可能会导致对所描述事件的错误记忆,如果这些故事符合读者的意识形态立场,这种影响会更加强烈。我们让 1299 名英国居民接触了关于英国脱欧的假新闻故事。44%的参与者报告说,他们对至少一个捏造的故事产生了错误的记忆,而对反映对方不佳的故事产生错误记忆的比例更高。对于那些作为脱欧或留欧支持者的社会身份受到威胁的参与者来说,这种意识形态一致性的影响略大;然而,只有在使用更保守的错误记忆定义进行探索性分析时,这种调节效应才具有统计学意义。认知能力和分析推理能力得分较高的参与者不易产生错误记忆。对英国脱欧有更好了解的人在区分真实和虚假故事方面表现更好,而自我报告的参与英国脱欧辩论与增加“记住”任何故事的倾向有关,而不管其真实性如何。这些结果表明,虚假新闻产生错误记忆的原因是社会和个人因素的结合,并表明接触社会身份威胁可能会增强虚假新闻的极化效应。

相似文献

1
Misremembering Brexit: partisan bias and individual predictors of false memories for fake news stories among Brexit voters.记错英国脱欧:英国脱欧选民对假新闻故事产生虚假记忆的党派偏见和个体预测因素。
Memory. 2021 May;29(5):587-604. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1923754. Epub 2021 May 10.
2
Us versus them: The role of national identity in the formation of false memories for fake news.我们与他们:民族认同在虚假新闻假记忆形成中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2024 Mar;30(1):33-47. doi: 10.1037/xap0000498. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
False Memories for Fake News During Ireland's Abortion Referendum.爱尔兰堕胎公投期间对假新闻的虚假记忆。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Oct;30(10):1449-1459. doi: 10.1177/0956797619864887. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
4
Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories for COVID-19 fake news.个体对 COVID-19 假新闻虚假记忆的易感性存在差异。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Dec 4;5(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00262-1.
5
Push polls increase false memories for fake news stories.推民意调查会增加对假新闻故事的虚假记忆。
Memory. 2021 Jul;29(6):693-707. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1934033. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
6
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.懒惰而非偏见:党派虚假新闻的易感性可以更好地用缺乏推理来解释,而不是用动机推理来解释。
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
7
Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?一错再错:在虚假记忆研究中,事后解释有多有效?
Memory. 2020 Aug;28(7):938-949. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1803917. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
8
False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts.虚假记忆与新冠疫情:人们如何在数字环境中轻信有关新冠疫情的假新闻。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:972004. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972004. eCollection 2022.
9
What makes us more susceptible to false memories in the era of COVID-19? A focus on vaccines and Green Pass.在 COVID-19 时代,是什么让我们更容易产生错误记忆?关注疫苗和绿码。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jan;13(1):e2815. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2815. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
10
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.先前的接触会增加对假新闻的感知准确性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1865-1880. doi: 10.1037/xge0000465. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
He said, she said: the "accused" and "complainant" in a sexual assault scenario are equally susceptible to misinformation.公说公有理,婆说婆有理:在性侵案件中,“被告”和“原告”同样容易受到错误信息的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27693. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13587-y.
2
Can deepfakes manipulate us? Assessing the evidence via a critical scoping review.深度伪造能操控我们吗?通过批判性范围综述评估证据。
PLoS One. 2025 May 2;20(5):e0320124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320124. eCollection 2025.
3
Fake news detection: state-of-the-art review and advances with attention to Arabic language aspects.
假新闻检测:最新技术综述及对阿拉伯语相关方面进展的关注
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Mar 11;11:e2693. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2693. eCollection 2025.
4
Proneness to false memory generation predicts pseudoscientific belief endorsement.虚假记忆生成倾向可预测伪科学信仰的支持。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jun 21;9(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00568-4.
5
Cognitive ability and voting behaviour in the 2016 UK referendum on European Union membership.2016 年英国脱欧公投中的认知能力与投票行为。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0289312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289312. eCollection 2023.
6
Face/Off: Changing the face of movies with deepfakes.变脸:用深度伪造技术改变电影面貌。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 6;18(7):e0287503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287503. eCollection 2023.
7
Bias and constructive processes in a self-memory system.自我记忆系统中的偏差和建设性过程。
Memory. 2024 Jul;32(6):656-665. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2232568. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
8
Fake news and false memory formation in the psychology debate.心理学辩论中的假新闻与错误记忆形成
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2023 Jun 8;15:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.06.002. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation.科学相关错误信息修正效果的元分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Sep;7(9):1514-1525. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01623-8. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
10
Everyday non-partisan fake news: Sharing behavior, platform specificity, and detection.日常无党派虚假新闻:分享行为、平台特性与检测
Front Psychol. 2023 May 15;14:1118407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118407. eCollection 2023.