• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推民意调查会增加对假新闻故事的虚假记忆。

Push polls increase false memories for fake news stories.

机构信息

School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Ireland.

Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

Memory. 2021 Jul;29(6):693-707. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1934033. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1080/09658211.2021.1934033
PMID:34080495
Abstract

Push polls are an insidious means of disseminating information under the guise of a legitimate information-gathering poll (e.g., "Would you be more or less likely to vote for X if you heard they were being investigated for tax fraud?"). While previous research has shown that push polls can affect attitudes, the current study assessed whether exposure to push polls can increase false memories for corresponding fake news stories. Across four studies, we found that participants ( = 1,290) were significantly more likely to report a false memory for a corresponding fabricated news story after push poll exposure. This was true for positive and negative stories, concerning both fictitious characters and well-known public figures. Furthermore, this effect was stronger after a delay of one week between the push poll and the news story. Our findings suggest that push polls are a potent applied example of the misinformation effect and can significantly increase susceptibility to fake news stories.

摘要

推民调是一种阴险的信息传播手段,它以合法的民意调查为幌子(例如:“如果你听说他们正在接受税务欺诈调查,你会不会更有可能投票给 X?”)。虽然之前的研究表明,推民调可能会影响态度,但目前的研究评估了接触推民调是否会增加对相应虚假新闻报道的虚假记忆。在四项研究中,我们发现参与者(n=1290)在接触推民调后,更有可能报告对相应捏造的新闻故事的虚假记忆。这对于正面和负面的故事都是如此,无论是虚构的角色还是知名的公众人物。此外,在推民调和新闻报道之间有一周的时间间隔后,这种效果更强。我们的研究结果表明,推民调是错误信息效应的一个有力的应用实例,它会显著增加对虚假新闻报道的易感性。

相似文献

1
Push polls increase false memories for fake news stories.推民意调查会增加对假新闻故事的虚假记忆。
Memory. 2021 Jul;29(6):693-707. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1934033. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
2
Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?一错再错:在虚假记忆研究中,事后解释有多有效?
Memory. 2020 Aug;28(7):938-949. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1803917. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
3
False Memories for Fake News During Ireland's Abortion Referendum.爱尔兰堕胎公投期间对假新闻的虚假记忆。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Oct;30(10):1449-1459. doi: 10.1177/0956797619864887. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
4
Misremembering Brexit: partisan bias and individual predictors of false memories for fake news stories among Brexit voters.记错英国脱欧:英国脱欧选民对假新闻故事产生虚假记忆的党派偏见和个体预测因素。
Memory. 2021 May;29(5):587-604. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1923754. Epub 2021 May 10.
5
Us versus them: The role of national identity in the formation of false memories for fake news.我们与他们:民族认同在虚假新闻假记忆形成中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2024 Mar;30(1):33-47. doi: 10.1037/xap0000498. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
6
Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories for COVID-19 fake news.个体对 COVID-19 假新闻虚假记忆的易感性存在差异。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Dec 4;5(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00262-1.
7
Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study.释俘有效:虚假新闻研究后成功撤回错误信息
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280295. eCollection 2023.
8
The Psychological Appeal of Fake-News Attributions.假新闻归因的心理吸引力。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):848-857. doi: 10.1177/0956797620922785. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
Memory and belief updating following complete and partial reminders of fake news.完整和部分虚假新闻提醒后记忆和信念更新。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 May 7;9(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00546-w.
10
False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts.虚假记忆与新冠疫情:人们如何在数字环境中轻信有关新冠疫情的假新闻。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:972004. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972004. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Can deepfakes manipulate us? Assessing the evidence via a critical scoping review.深度伪造能操控我们吗?通过批判性范围综述评估证据。
PLoS One. 2025 May 2;20(5):e0320124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320124. eCollection 2025.
2
Memory Sins in Applied Settings: What Kind of Progress?应用场景中的记忆错误:取得了怎样的进展?
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2022 Dec;11(4):445-460. doi: 10.1037/mac0000078.