Suppr超能文献

虚假记忆与新冠疫情:人们如何在数字环境中轻信有关新冠疫情的假新闻。

False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts.

作者信息

Mangiulli Ivan, Battista Fabiana, Kafi Nadja Abdel, Coveliers Eline, Webster Theodore Carlson, Curci Antonietta, Otgaar Henry

机构信息

Department of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.

Faculty of Law and Criminology, Leuven Institute of Criminology, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:972004. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972004. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

People are often exposed to fake news. Such an exposure to misleading information might lead to false memory creation. We examined whether people can form false memories for COVID-19-related fake news. Furthermore, we investigated which individual factors might predict false memory formation for fake news. In two experiments, we provided participants with two pieces of COVID-19-related fake news along with a non-probative photograph. In Experiment 1, 41% ( = 66/161) of our sample reported at least one false memory for COVID-19-related fake news. In Experiment 2, even a higher percentage emerged (54.9%;  = 185/337). Moreover, in Experiment 2, participants with conspiracy beliefs were more likely to report false memories for fake news than those without such beliefs, irrespective of the conspiratorial nature of the materials. Finally, while well-being was found to be positively associated with both true and false memories (Experiment 1), only analytical thinking was negatively linked to the vulnerability to form false memories for COVID-19-related fake news (Experiment 2). Overall, our data demonstrated that false memories can occur following exposure to fake news about COVID-19, and that governmental and social media interventions are needed to increase individuals' discriminability between true and false COVID-19-related news.

摘要

人们经常接触到假新闻。这种对误导性信息的接触可能会导致虚假记忆的形成。我们研究了人们是否会对与新冠病毒相关的假新闻形成虚假记忆。此外,我们还调查了哪些个体因素可能预测对假新闻的虚假记忆形成。在两项实验中,我们为参与者提供了两条与新冠病毒相关的假新闻以及一张无关的照片。在实验1中,我们样本中的41%(=66/161)报告至少对一条与新冠病毒相关的假新闻有虚假记忆。在实验2中,出现了更高的比例(54.9%;=185/337)。此外,在实验2中,有阴谋论信念的参与者比没有这种信念的参与者更有可能报告对假新闻的虚假记忆,无论材料的阴谋性质如何。最后,虽然幸福感被发现与真实和虚假记忆都呈正相关(实验1),但只有分析性思维与对与新冠病毒相关的假新闻形成虚假记忆的易感性呈负相关(实验2)。总体而言,我们的数据表明,接触关于新冠病毒的假新闻后可能会出现虚假记忆,并且需要政府和社交媒体进行干预,以提高个人对与新冠病毒相关真假新闻的辨别能力。

相似文献

1
False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:972004. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.972004. eCollection 2022.
2
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
3
Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories for COVID-19 fake news.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Dec 4;5(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00262-1.
4
Us versus them: The role of national identity in the formation of false memories for fake news.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2024 Mar;30(1):33-47. doi: 10.1037/xap0000498. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
5
Misremembering Brexit: partisan bias and individual predictors of false memories for fake news stories among Brexit voters.
Memory. 2021 May;29(5):587-604. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1923754. Epub 2021 May 10.
6
What makes us more susceptible to false memories in the era of COVID-19? A focus on vaccines and Green Pass.
Brain Behav. 2023 Jan;13(1):e2815. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2815. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
8
Memory and belief updating following complete and partial reminders of fake news.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 May 7;9(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00546-w.

引用本文的文献

1
2
A Survey on the Criteria Used to Judge (Fake) News in Italian Population.
Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70315. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70315.
5
Fake news and false memory formation in the psychology debate.
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2023 Jun 8;15:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.06.002. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

3
COVID-19 Pandemic as a Traumatic Event and Its Associations with Fear and Mental Health: A Cognitive-Activation Approach.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 12;18(14):7422. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147422.
4
Misremembering Brexit: partisan bias and individual predictors of false memories for fake news stories among Brexit voters.
Memory. 2021 May;29(5):587-604. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1923754. Epub 2021 May 10.
5
Conspiracy theories in the era of COVID-19: A tale of two pandemics.
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Feb;75(2):e13778. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13778.
6
COVID-19, Fake News, and Vaccines: Should Regulation Be Implemented?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 16;18(2):744. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020744.
7
The Instagram Infodemic: Cobranding of Conspiracy Theories, Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Authority-Questioning Beliefs.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Aug;24(8):573-577. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0663. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
8
Pandemics and infodemics: Research on the effects of misinformation on memory.
Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2021 Jan;3(1):8-12. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.228. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
9
Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories for COVID-19 fake news.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Dec 4;5(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00262-1.
10
Risk Perceptions and Psychological Effects During the Italian COVID-19 Emergency.
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:580053. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580053. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验