MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, UCL, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK.
Health Data Research UK, London, UK.
Trials. 2021 May 10;22(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05295-5.
Routinely collected electronic health records (EHRs) have the potential to enhance randomised controlled trials (RCTs) by facilitating recruitment and follow-up. Despite this, current EHR use is minimal in UK RCTs, in part due to ongoing concerns about the utility (reliability, completeness, accuracy) and accessibility of the data. The aim of this manuscript is to document the process, timelines and challenges of the application process to help improve the service both for the applicants and data holders.
This is a qualitative paper providing a descriptive narrative from one UK clinical trials unit (MRC CTU at UCL) on the experience of two trial teams' application process to access data from three large English national datasets: National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS), National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR) and NHS Digital to establish themes for discussion. The underpinning reason for applying for the data was to compare EHRs with data collected through case report forms in two RCTs, Add-Aspirin (ISRCTN 74358648) and PATCH (ISRCTN 70406718).
The Add-Aspirin trial, which had a pre-planned embedded sub-study to assess EHR, received data from NCRAS 13 months after the first application. In the PATCH trial, the decision to request data was made whilst the trial was recruiting. The study received data after 8 months from NICOR and 15 months for NHS Digital following final application submission. This concluded in May 2020. Prior to application submission, significant time and effort was needed particularly in relation to the PATCH trial where negotiations over consent and data linkage took many years.
Our experience demonstrates that data access can be a prolonged and complex process. This is compounded if multiple data sources are required for the same project. This needs to be factored in when planning to use EHR within RCTs and is best considered prior to conception of the trial. Data holders and researchers are endeavouring to simplify and streamline the application process so that the potential of EHR can be realised for clinical trials.
常规收集的电子健康记录(EHR)有可能通过促进招募和随访来增强随机对照试验(RCT)。尽管如此,目前在英国 RCT 中,EHR 的使用非常有限,部分原因是对数据的实用性(可靠性、完整性、准确性)和可访问性持续存在担忧。本文的目的是记录申请流程的过程、时间表和挑战,以帮助改善申请人和数据持有者的服务。
这是一份定性文件,提供了来自英国临床试验单位(UCL MRC CTU)的描述性叙述,介绍了两个试验团队申请访问来自三个英国国家大型数据集(国家癌症登记和分析服务(NCRAS)、国家心血管结果研究机构(NICOR)和 NHS Digital)的数据的经验,以确定主题进行讨论。申请这些数据的根本原因是将 EHR 与两项 RCT(Add-Aspirin [ISRCTN 74358648] 和 PATCH [ISRCTN 70406718])中通过病例报告表收集的数据进行比较。
Add-Aspirin 试验预先计划了一个嵌入式子研究来评估 EHR,在第一次申请后 13 个月收到了 NCRAS 的数据。在 PATCH 试验中,在招募试验时决定请求数据。该研究从 NICOR 获得数据需要 8 个月,从 NHS Digital 获得数据需要 15 个月,最终申请提交后。这在 2020 年 5 月结束。在提交申请之前,需要大量的时间和精力,特别是在 PATCH 试验中,协商同意和数据链接需要多年的时间。
我们的经验表明,数据访问可能是一个漫长而复杂的过程。如果同一个项目需要多个数据源,情况会更加复杂。这在计划在 RCT 中使用 EHR 时需要考虑到,并且最好在试验构思之前考虑到。数据持有者和研究人员正在努力简化和简化申请流程,以便为临床试验实现 EHR 的潜力。