Department of Sociology, William Paterson University, 300 Pompton Road, Wayne, NJ07470, USA.
Saint Joseph's WIC Program, Paterson, NJ, USA.
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(12):3922-3928. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021001981. Epub 2021 May 11.
To evaluate the cost and cost-effectiveness of a farm-to-Special Supplemental Nutrition Programme for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) intervention to promote vegetable intake and the redemption of WIC vouchers for produce purchases at farmers' markets.
An economic analysis was undertaken using data from a pilot of the intervention. Vegetable intake was assessed with a reflection spectroscopy device (the Veggie Meter® [VM]) and via self-report. Voucher redemption was reported by WIC. Total and per participant intervention costs and cost-effectiveness ratios (expressed as cost per intervention effect) were estimated in 2019 US dollars over a 6-month period from the perspective of the agency implementing the intervention.
A large, urban WIC agency.
Participants were 297 WIC-enrolled adults.
Post-intervention, VM scores, self-reported vegetable intake and voucher redemption were higher in the intervention as compared with the control study group. Over the 6-month period, intervention costs were $31 092 ($194 unit cost per participant). Relative to the control group, the intervention cost $8·10 per increased VM score per participant, $3·85 per increased cup/d of vegetables consumed per participant and $3·29 per increased percentage point in voucher redemption per participant.
Intervention costs and cost-effectiveness ratios compared favourably with those reported for other interventions targeting vegetable intake in low-income groups, suggesting that the programme may be cost effective in promoting vegetable purchases and consumption. As there is no benchmark against which to compare cost-effectiveness ratios expressed as cost per unit of effectiveness, conclusions regarding whether this is the case must await further research.
评估一项从农场到特殊补充营养计划(WIC)的干预措施,以促进蔬菜摄入量并兑换 WIC 券用于在农贸市场购买农产品,从而增加成本和成本效益。
使用干预措施试点数据进行经济分析。蔬菜摄入量采用反射光谱仪(Veggie Meter® [VM])和自我报告进行评估。WIC 报告了优惠券的兑换情况。在 6 个月的时间内,从实施干预措施的机构的角度出发,估计了总和每个参与者的干预成本以及成本效益比(表示为每个干预效果的成本),以 2019 年美元计算。
一个大型城市 WIC 机构。
参与者为 297 名 WIC 登记的成年人。
与对照组相比,干预组在干预后 VM 评分、自我报告的蔬菜摄入量和优惠券兑换率更高。在 6 个月的时间内,干预成本为 31092 美元(每位参与者的单位成本为 194 美元)。与对照组相比,干预措施每增加一位参与者的 VM 评分增加 8.10 美元,每位参与者增加 1 杯/天的蔬菜摄入量增加 3.85 美元,每位参与者的优惠券兑换率增加 1 个百分点增加 3.29 美元。
干预措施的成本和成本效益比与针对低收入群体的其他促进蔬菜摄入量的干预措施报告的成本效益比相当,这表明该方案可能在促进蔬菜购买和消费方面具有成本效益。由于没有可以与以单位效果成本表示的成本效益比进行比较的基准,因此必须等待进一步的研究来得出关于这种情况是否如此的结论。