Suppr超能文献

感染 SARS-CoV-2 的女性接受辅助生殖技术后的围产期结局:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Perinatal outcomes of pregnancies resulting from assisted reproduction technology in SARS-CoV-2-infected women: a prospective observational study.

机构信息

Fertility Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital of Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.

Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro.Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2021 Sep;116(3):731-740. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perinatal and maternal outcomes of pregnancies in women infected with SARS-CoV-2, comparing spontaneous and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies (with either own or donor oocytes).

DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, observational study.

SETTING

78 centers participating in the Spanish COVID19 Registry.

PATIENT(S): 1,347 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 positive results registered consecutively between February 26 and November 5, 2020.

INTERVENTION(S): The patients' information was collected from their medical records, and multivariable regression analyses were performed, controlling for maternal age and the clinical presentation of the infection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Obstetrics and neonatal outcomes, pregnancy comorbidities, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation need, and medical conditions.

RESULT(S): The IVF group included 74 (5.5%) women whereas the spontaneous pregnancy group included 1,275 (94.5%) women. The operative delivery rate was high in all patients, especially in the IVF group, where cesarean section became the most frequent method of delivery (55.4%, compared with 26.1% of the spontaneous pregnancy group). The reason for cesarean section was induction failure in 56.1% of the IVF patients. IVF women had more gestational hypertensive disorders (16.2% vs. 4.5% among spontaneous pregnancy women, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.45-10.93) irrespective of oocyte origin. The higher rate of intensive care unit admittance observed in the IVF group (8.1% vs. 2.4% in the spontaneous pregnancy group) was attributed to preeclampsia (aOR 11.82, 95% CI 5.25-25.87), not to the type of conception.

CONCLUSION(S): A high rate of operative delivery was observed in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2, especially in those with IVF pregnancies; method of conception did not affect fetal or maternal outcomes, except for preeclampsia.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04558996.

摘要

目的

评估感染 SARS-CoV-2 的孕妇的围产期和母婴结局,比较自然妊娠和体外受精(IVF)妊娠(使用自身或捐赠卵子)。

设计

多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。

设置

参与西班牙 COVID19 登记处的 78 个中心。

患者

2020 年 2 月 26 日至 11 月 5 日连续登记的 1347 例 SARS-CoV-2 阳性结果孕妇。

干预措施

从病历中收集患者信息,并进行多变量回归分析,控制母体年龄和感染的临床表现。

主要观察指标

产科和新生儿结局、妊娠合并症、重症监护病房(ICU)入院、机械通气需求和医疗状况。

结果

IVF 组包括 74 例(5.5%)女性,自然妊娠组包括 1275 例(94.5%)女性。所有患者的剖宫产率均较高,尤其是 IVF 组,其中剖宫产成为最常见的分娩方式(55.4%,自然妊娠组为 26.1%)。IVF 患者中 56.1%因引产失败而行剖宫产。IVF 孕妇更易发生妊娠高血压疾病(16.2% vs. 自然妊娠组 4.5%,调整优势比[aOR]5.31,95%置信区间[CI]2.45-10.93),与卵母细胞来源无关。IVF 组 ICU 入院率较高(8.1% vs. 自然妊娠组 2.4%),原因是子痫前期(aOR 11.82,95%CI 5.25-25.87),而非受孕方式。

结论

感染 SARS-CoV-2 的孕妇剖宫产率较高,尤其是 IVF 妊娠孕妇;受孕方式不影响胎儿或母婴结局,除子痫前期外。

临床试验注册号

NCT04558996。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91bd/8041182/02132b88c5ca/figs1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验