• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国人群的基因素养意识和知识差距:健康信息国家趋势调查结果

Assessing Genetic Literacy Awareness and Knowledge Gaps in the US Population: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

作者信息

Krakow Melinda, Ratcliff Chelsea L, Hesse Bradford W, Greenberg-Worisek Alexandra J

机构信息

Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(6):343-348. doi: 10.1159/000489117. Epub 2018 May 31.

DOI:10.1159/000489117
PMID:29852491
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6095736/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Public understanding of the role of genetics in disease risk is key to appropriate disease prevention and detection. This study assessed the current extent of awareness and use of genetic testing in the US population. Additionally, the study identified characteristics of subgroups more likely to be at risk for low genetic literacy.

METHODS

The study used data from the National Cancer Institute's 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey, including measures of genetic testing awareness, genetic testing applications and genetic testing usage. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated associations between sociodemographics, genetic testing awareness, and genetic testing use.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven percent of respondents were aware of genetic tests. Testing awareness differed by age, household income, and race/ethnicity. Most participants had heard of using tests to determine personal disease risk (82.58%) or inherited disease risk in children (81.41%), but less were familiar with determining treatment (38.29%) or drug efficacy (40.76%). Among those with genetic testing awareness, actual testing uptake was low.

CONCLUSIONS

A large portion of the general public lacks genetic testing awareness and may benefit from educational campaigns. As precision medicine expands, increasing public awareness about genetic testing applications for disease prevention and treatment will be important to support population health.

摘要

背景/目的:公众对遗传学在疾病风险中的作用的理解是适当的疾病预防和检测的关键。本研究评估了美国人群中目前对基因检测的知晓程度和使用情况。此外,该研究还确定了更有可能存在低基因素养风险的亚组特征。

方法

该研究使用了美国国立癌症研究所2017年健康信息全国趋势调查的数据,包括基因检测知晓度、基因检测应用和基因检测使用情况的测量指标。多变量逻辑回归模型估计了社会人口统计学、基因检测知晓度和基因检测使用之间的关联。

结果

57%的受访者知晓基因检测。检测知晓度因年龄、家庭收入和种族/民族而异。大多数参与者听说过使用检测来确定个人疾病风险(82.58%)或儿童遗传性疾病风险(81.41%),但对确定治疗方法(38.29%)或药物疗效(40.76%)了解较少。在知晓基因检测的人群中,实际进行检测的比例较低。

结论

很大一部分公众缺乏基因检测意识,可能会从教育活动中受益。随着精准医学的发展,提高公众对基因检测在疾病预防和治疗中的应用的认识对于促进人群健康至关重要。

相似文献

1
Assessing Genetic Literacy Awareness and Knowledge Gaps in the US Population: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey.评估美国人群的基因素养意识和知识差距:健康信息国家趋势调查结果
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(6):343-348. doi: 10.1159/000489117. Epub 2018 May 31.
2
HPV-Related Knowledge and Impact of Patient-Provider Communication on HPV-Associated Cervical Cancer Awareness and Pap Smear Completion in US Women Aged 21-65 Years.人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关知识以及医患沟通对美国21至65岁女性HPV相关宫颈癌知晓率和巴氏涂片检查完成情况的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;17(7):1188. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071188.
3
Predictors of Population Awareness of Cancer Genetic Tests: Implications for Enhancing Equity in Engaging in Cancer Prevention and Precision Medicine.癌症遗传检测的公众认知度预测因素:对增进参与癌症预防和精准医学的公平性的启示。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Nov 3;5. doi: 10.1200/PO.21.00231. eCollection 2021.
4
Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk and Perceived Importance of Genetic Information Among US Population by Race and Ethnicity: a Cross-sectional Study.美国不同种族和族裔人群的癌症风险遗传检测和对遗传信息重要性的认知:一项横断面研究。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Feb;11(1):382-394. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01526-4. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
5
Clinical trial awareness among racial/ethnic minorities in HINTS 2007: sociodemographic, attitudinal, and knowledge correlates.2007 年 HINTS 中少数族裔对临床试验的认知:社会人口学、态度和知识相关性。
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 3(0 3):92-101. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.525296.
6
Predictors of human papillomavirus awareness and knowledge in 2013: gaps and opportunities for targeted communication strategies.2013年人乳头瘤病毒知晓率及知识的预测因素:针对性沟通策略的差距与机遇
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):402-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.024. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
7
Awareness of the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service: results from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).对美国国立癌症研究所癌症信息服务的认知:健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS)结果
J Health Commun. 2006;11 Suppl 1:117-33. doi: 10.1080/10810730600637517.
8
Awareness and use of genetic testing: An analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey 2020.遗传检测的认知与使用:2020 年健康信息国家趋势调查分析。
Genet Med. 2022 Dec;24(12):2526-2534. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.08.023. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
9
A survey on awareness, knowledge and preferences toward genetic testing among the United States general public.美国普通公众对基因检测的认知、知识和偏好的调查。
Per Med. 2024;21(2):117-129. doi: 10.2217/pme-2023-0106. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
10
Do's and Don'ts of Taking Care of Deaf Patients.照顾聋哑患者的注意事项。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 31;10(1):L1-L8. doi: 10.21980/J8336T. eCollection 2025 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness and knowledge of familial breast and ovarian cancer among German general practice patients.德国全科医疗患者对家族性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的知晓情况与认知程度。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70105. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70105.
2
Clinician Recommendation for Hereditary Genetic Testing in Participants at Increased Risk for Hereditary Cancer.针对遗传性癌症风险增加的参与者进行遗传性基因检测的临床医生建议。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 14;17(12):1994. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121994.
3
Evaluating the Applied Knowledge of BRCA Testing among Spanish-Preferring Latino Americans: The Influence of Acculturation and Literacy.评估偏好西班牙语的拉丁裔美国人对BRCA检测的应用知识:文化适应和读写能力的影响。
Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):229-240. doi: 10.1159/000546903. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
4
Patient, caregiver experiences in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: insights from a multi-national survey.转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者及照料者的经历:一项多国调查的见解
Future Oncol. 2025 Jul;21(16):2053-2066. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2510890. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
5
Neighborhood Disadvantage and Genetic Testing Use Among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults.美国成年人全国代表性样本中的邻里劣势与基因检测使用情况
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251342102. doi: 10.1177/21501319251342102. Epub 2025 May 25.
6
Awareness and utilization of genetic testing for hereditary cancers in cancer survivors: a cross-sectional 2021 HINTS-SEER study.癌症幸存者对遗传性癌症基因检测的认知与应用:一项2021年横断面的健康信息全国趋势调查(HINTS)-监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)研究
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01823-3.
7
The case for integrating genetic counselors into primary care: A paradigm shift for our profession.将遗传咨询师纳入初级保健的理由:我们这个职业的范式转变。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70051. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70051.
8
Exploring individuals' experiences with self-reported unmet need for genetic testing.探索个体自我报告的基因检测未满足需求的经历。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 May;33(5):649-657. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01838-5. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
9
Exploring Literacy and Knowledge Gaps and Disparities in Genetics and Oncogenomics Among Cancer Patients and the General Population: A Scoping Review.探索癌症患者和普通人群在遗传学和肿瘤基因组学方面的读写能力、知识差距及差异:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 9;13(2):121. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020121.
10
Evaluating genetic counseling session duration: A scoping review of patient care time, influencing factors, and impact on patient outcomes.评估遗传咨询会话时长:对患者护理时间、影响因素及对患者结局影响的范围综述。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e1999. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1999. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Engagement with Genetic Information and Uptake of Genetic Testing: the Role of Trust and Personal Cancer History.对基因信息的接触与基因检测的接受情况:信任和个人癌症病史的作用
J Cancer Educ. 2018 Aug;33(4):893-900. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1160-9.
2
My Cancer Genome: Evaluating an Educational Model to Introduce Patients and Caregivers to Precision Medicine Information.我的癌症基因组:评估一种向患者及护理人员介绍精准医学信息的教育模式。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2016 Jul 20;2016:112-21. eCollection 2016.
3
Media Exposure and Genetic Literacy Skills to Evaluate Angelina Jolie's Decision for Prophylactic Mastectomy.媒体曝光与评估安吉丽娜·朱莉预防性乳房切除术决策的基因知识技能
Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(5):282-9. doi: 10.1159/000447944. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
Relationships Between Health Literacy and Genomics-Related Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Perceived Importance, and Communication in a Medically Underserved Population.医疗服务不足人群的健康素养与基因组学相关知识、自我效能感、感知重要性及沟通之间的关系
J Health Commun. 2016;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):58-68. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1144661.
5
Precision Public Health for the Era of Precision Medicine.精准医学时代的精准公共卫生。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Mar;50(3):398-401. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.031. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
6
Precision medicine: Beyond the inflection point.精准医学:超越转折点。
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Aug 12;7(300):300ps17. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa9970.
7
Characterizing Participants in the ClinSeq Genome Sequencing Cohort as Early Adopters of a New Health Technology.将ClinSeq基因组测序队列中的参与者表征为一种新健康技术的早期采用者。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 17;10(7):e0132690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132690. eCollection 2015.
8
A new initiative on precision medicine.一项关于精准医学的新倡议。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):793-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
9
Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Findings from the 2013 U.S. Health Information National Trends Survey.公众对直接面向消费者的基因检测的认知:来自2013年美国健康信息国家趋势调查的结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):799-807. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0784-x.
10
Prevalence and correlates of receiving and sharing high-penetrance cancer genetic test results: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey.接受和分享高穿透性癌症基因检测结果的患病率及其相关因素:来自健康信息国家趋势调查的结果
Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(2):67-77. doi: 10.1159/000368745.