Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Typical Environmental Pollution and Health Hazards, School of Public Health, University of South China, Hengyang, China.
Key Laboratory of Environment-Friendly Chemistry and Application of Ministry of Education, Laboratory of Biochemistry, College of Chemistry, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, China.
J Appl Toxicol. 2021 Dec;41(12):2021-2030. doi: 10.1002/jat.4182. Epub 2021 May 10.
The success of graphene oxide (GO) has attracted extensive research interests in developing novel 2D nanomaterials (NMs). Graphdiyne (GDY) is a new member of carbon-based 2D NMs possessing sp- and sp -hybridized carbon atoms. However, the toxicity of GDY is less investigated as GO. In this study, we compared the toxicity of GDY and GO with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Exposure to up to 100-μg/ml GDY and GO induced cytotoxicity, but there was no statistically significant difference between GDY and GO. At noncytotoxic concentration, 25-μg/ml GDY or GO led to the internalization of NMs, typically in cytoplasm but not in nuclei. Only GO but not GDY significantly increased THP-1 adhesion onto NM-exposed HUVECs. Meanwhile, compared with GDY, GO more effectively promoted the release of soluble intracellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), indicating the differential effects of GDY and GO on endothelial activation. Neither GDY nor GO induced intracellular superoxide. However, GO significantly promoted the expression of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress genes activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and X-box binding protein 1 spliced (XBP-1s), as well pyroptosis genes NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) and gasdermin D (GSDMD), whereas GDY did not show this effect. The results suggested that GDY and GO could be internalized into HUVECs leading to cytotoxic effects. However, GO was more potent to activate endothelial activation probably due to the activation of ER stress and pyroptosis genes.
氧化石墨烯(GO)的成功引起了人们对开发新型二维纳米材料(NMs)的广泛研究兴趣。石墨炔(GDY)是碳基二维 NMs 的新成员,具有 sp 和 sp 杂化碳原子。然而,GDY 的毒性研究不如 GO 广泛。在这项研究中,我们比较了 GDY 和 GO 对人脐静脉内皮细胞(HUVECs)的毒性。暴露于高达 100-μg/ml 的 GDY 和 GO 会引起细胞毒性,但 GDY 和 GO 之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在非细胞毒性浓度下,25-μg/ml 的 GDY 或 GO 导致 NM 内化,通常在内质网中,但不在核中。只有 GO 而不是 GDY 显著增加了 THP-1 在 NM 暴露的 HUVECs 上的黏附。同时,与 GDY 相比,GO 更有效地促进了可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1(sICAM-1)的释放,表明 GDY 和 GO 对内皮细胞激活的影响不同。GDY 和 GO 均未诱导细胞内超氧阴离子。然而,GO 显著促进了内质网(ER)应激基因激活转录因子 4(ATF4)和 X 盒结合蛋白 1 剪接(XBP-1s)以及细胞焦亡基因 NOD 样受体家族 pyrin 结构域包含 3(NLRP3)和 gasdermin D(GSDMD)的表达,而 GDY 则没有表现出这种效应。结果表明,GDY 和 GO 可以被内化到 HUVECs 中,导致细胞毒性作用。然而,GO 更能激活内皮细胞激活,可能是由于 ER 应激和细胞焦亡基因的激活。