• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of a Digital Intervention on Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Comorbid Hypertension or Diabetes in Brazil and Peru: Two Randomized Clinical Trials.巴西和秘鲁的伴发高血压或糖尿病患者的数字干预对抑郁症状的影响:两项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2021 May 11;325(18):1852-1862. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4348.
2
A Mobile Health Intervention for Patients With Depressive Symptoms: Protocol for an Economic Evaluation Alongside Two Randomized Trials in Brazil and Peru.一项针对有抑郁症状患者的移动健康干预措施:在巴西和秘鲁两项随机试验基础上进行经济评估的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Oct 13;10(10):e26164. doi: 10.2196/26164.
3
Do baseline participant characteristics impact the effectiveness of a mobile health intervention for depressive symptoms? A post-hoc subgroup analysis of the CONEMO trials.基线参与者特征是否会影响针对抑郁症状的移动健康干预的效果?CONEMO 试验的事后亚组分析。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2024;46:e20233172. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3172. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
4
Effect of Telephone-Delivered Collaborative Goal Setting and Behavioral Activation vs Enhanced Usual Care for Depression Among Adults With Uncontrolled Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.电话传递式协作目标设定和行为激活联合常规护理与强化常规护理对伴发未控制糖尿病的成年抑郁症患者的效果比较:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198634. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8634.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Use of a Mobile Phone App to Treat Depression Comorbid With Hypertension or Diabetes: A Pilot Study in Brazil and Peru.使用手机应用程序治疗合并高血压或糖尿病的抑郁症:巴西和秘鲁的一项试点研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Apr 26;6(4):e11698. doi: 10.2196/11698.
7
Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol Among Patients With Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial.印度一项针对伴发抑郁和糖尿病患者的随机临床试验(INDEPENDENT)表明,协同护理模式可改善抑郁症状及糖化血红蛋白、血压和血清胆固醇水平。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):651-662. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11747.
8
Participants' and Nurses' Experiences With a Digital Intervention for Patients With Depressive Symptoms and Comorbid Hypertension or Diabetes in Peru: Qualitative Post-Randomized Controlled Trial Study.秘鲁针对伴有抑郁症状及合并高血压或糖尿病患者的数字干预措施中参与者与护士的体验:定性随机对照试验研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 15;9(3):e35486. doi: 10.2196/35486.
9
Effect of Integrated Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment and Problem-Solving Therapy on Body Mass Index and Depressive Symptoms Among Patients With Obesity and Depression: The RAINBOW Randomized Clinical Trial.综合行为减肥治疗与问题解决疗法对肥胖合并抑郁症患者体重指数及抑郁症状的影响:RAINBOW随机临床试验
JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):869-879. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0557.
10
Outcomes of Online Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Patients With Residual Depressive Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在线正念认知疗法治疗残留抑郁症状患者的结局:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):563-573. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4693.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Rapid Scoping Review.低收入和中等收入国家抑郁症和焦虑症的数字健康干预措施:快速范围审查
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Aug 22;12:e68296. doi: 10.2196/68296.
2
Effects of WeChat-based telehealth on patients reported outcomes of hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.基于微信的远程医疗对高血压患者报告结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22035. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04504-4.
3
Understanding how digital mental health interventions can be optimised to improve longer term sustainability: Findings from a causal mediation analysis of the CONEMO trials.了解如何优化数字心理健康干预措施以提高长期可持续性:CONEMO试验因果中介分析的结果
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 1;5(7):e0004537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004537. eCollection 2025.
4
Effectiveness of Digital Behavioral Activation Interventions for Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.数字行为激活干预对抑郁和焦虑的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 17;27:e68054. doi: 10.2196/68054.
5
Are Economic Evaluations of Task Shifting Too Narrow in Focus? A Rapid Review.任务转移的经济评估是否聚焦过窄?一项快速综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01507-x.
6
The evolving field of digital mental health: current evidence and implementation issues for smartphone apps, generative artificial intelligence, and virtual reality.数字心理健康的发展领域:智能手机应用程序、生成式人工智能和虚拟现实的当前证据及实施问题
World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):156-174. doi: 10.1002/wps.21299.
7
Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Digital Interventions for Anxiety and Depression in Latin America: A Scoping Review.拉丁美洲实施焦虑和抑郁数字干预措施的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 17;22(4):628. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040628.
8
Methodological approaches and author-reported limitations in evaluation studies of digital health technologies (DHT): A scoping review of DHT interventions for cancer, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases.数字健康技术(DHT)评估研究中的方法学途径及作者报告的局限性:对癌症、糖尿病和心血管疾病的DHT干预措施的范围综述
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 24;4(4):e0000806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000806. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
Efficacy and safety of behavioural activation on depression in people with co-occurring non-communicable diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis.行为激活对合并非传染性疾病患者抑郁症的疗效和安全性:系统评价与荟萃分析
BJPsych Open. 2025 Mar 24;11(2):e70. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.870.
10
Longterm efficacy of a patient focused intervention in patients with asplenia- a three year follow-up of the PrePPS trial.以患者为中心的干预措施对无脾患者的长期疗效——PrePPS试验的三年随访
Infection. 2025 Jan 29. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02472-5.

本文引用的文献

1
The emergence of digital mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: A review of recent advances and implications for the treatment and prevention of mental disorders.低收入和中等收入国家数字心理健康的兴起:近期进展回顾及其对精神障碍治疗与预防的影响
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jan;133:223-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.12.016. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
2
Global Mental Health Services Are Collapsing as Demand Grows.随着需求增长,全球心理健康服务正在崩溃。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 17;324(19):1933. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22085.
3
How much change is enough? Evidence from a longitudinal study on depression in UK primary care.变化多少才算足够?来自英国初级保健中抑郁纵向研究的证据。
Psychol Med. 2022 Jul;52(10):1875-1882. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003700. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
4
Comorbid depression in medical diseases.医学疾病共病的抑郁。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Aug 20;6(1):69. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0200-2.
5
Treatment outcomes for depression: challenges and opportunities.抑郁症的治疗结果:挑战与机遇。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;7(11):925-927. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30036-5. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
6
Defining Success in Measurement-Based Care for Depression: A Comparison of Common Metrics.基于测量的抑郁症治疗中的成功定义:常见指标的比较。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Apr 1;71(4):312-318. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900295. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
7
Internet-Based Interventions for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental Disorders in Latin America: A Scoping Review.基于互联网的拉丁美洲精神障碍预防与治疗干预措施:一项范围综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 13;10:664. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00664. eCollection 2019.
8
Targeting depressive symptoms with technology.利用技术手段针对抑郁症状
Mhealth. 2019 Jul 9;5:19. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.06.04. eCollection 2019.
9
Experimental Therapeutics for Digital Mental Health.数字心理健康的实验性疗法
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1223-1224. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2075.
10
Addressing Depression Comorbid With Diabetes or Hypertension in Resource-Poor Settings: A Qualitative Study About User Perception of a Nurse-Supported Smartphone App in Peru.在资源匮乏地区应对糖尿病或高血压合并抑郁症:关于秘鲁用户对一款护士支持的智能手机应用程序认知的定性研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Jun 18;6(6):e11701. doi: 10.2196/11701.

巴西和秘鲁的伴发高血压或糖尿病患者的数字干预对抑郁症状的影响:两项随机临床试验

Effect of a Digital Intervention on Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Comorbid Hypertension or Diabetes in Brazil and Peru: Two Randomized Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Population Mental Health Research Centre, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

JAMA. 2021 May 11;325(18):1852-1862. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4348.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2021.4348
PMID:33974019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8114139/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Depression is a leading contributor to disease burden globally. Digital mental health interventions can address the treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries, but the effectiveness in these countries is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of a digital intervention in reducing depressive symptoms among people with diabetes and/or hypertension.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants with clinically significant depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] score ≥10) who were being treated for hypertension and/or diabetes were enrolled in a cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT) at 20 sites in São Paulo, Brazil (N=880; from September 2016 to September 2017; final follow-up, April 2018), and in an individual-level RCT at 7 sites in Lima, Peru (N=432; from January 2017 to September 2017; final follow-up, March 2018).

INTERVENTIONS

An 18-session, low-intensity, digital intervention was delivered over 6 weeks via a provided smartphone, based on behavioral activation principles, and supported by nurse assistants (n = 440 participants in 10 clusters in São Paulo; n = 217 participants in Lima) vs enhanced usual care (n = 440 participants in 10 clusters in São Paulo; n = 215 participants in Lima).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was a reduction of at least 50% from baseline in PHQ-9 scores (range, 0-27; higher score indicates more severe depression) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included a reduction of at least 50% from baseline PHQ-9 scores at 6 months.

RESULTS

Among 880 patients cluster randomized in Brazil (mean age, 56.0 years; 761 [86.5%] women) and 432 patients individually randomized in Peru (mean age, 59.7 years; 352 [81.5%] women), 807 (91.7%) in Brazil and 426 (98.6%) in Peru completed at least 1 follow-up assessment. The proportion of participants in São Paulo with a reduction in PHQ-9 score of at least 50% at 3-month follow-up was 40.7% (159/391 participants) in the digital intervention group vs 28.6% (114/399 participants) in the enhanced usual care group (difference, 12.1 percentage points [95% CI, 5.5 to 18.7]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.6 [95% CI, 1.2 to 2.2]; P = .001). In Lima, the proportion of participants with a reduction in PHQ-9 score of at least 50% at 3-month follow-up was 52.7% (108/205 participants) in the digital intervention group vs 34.1% (70/205 participants) in the enhanced usual care group (difference, 18.6 percentage points [95% CI, 9.1 to 28.0]; adjusted OR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.4 to 3.2]; P < .001). At 6-month follow-up, differences across groups were no longer statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In 2 RCTs of patients with hypertension or diabetes and depressive symptoms in Brazil and Peru, a digital intervention delivered over a 6-week period significantly improved depressive symptoms at 3 months when compared with enhanced usual care. However, the magnitude of the effect was small in the trial from Brazil and the effects were not sustained at 6 months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02846662 (São Paulo) and NCT03026426 (Lima).

摘要

重要性

抑郁症是导致全球疾病负担的主要原因之一。数字心理健康干预措施可以解决中低收入国家的治疗缺口,但这些国家的效果尚不清楚。

目的

研究数字干预措施在降低患有糖尿病和/或高血压的人群中抑郁症状的有效性。

设计、设置和参与者:在巴西圣保罗的 20 个地点(N=880;从 2016 年 9 月至 2017 年 9 月;最终随访,2018 年 4 月)和秘鲁利马的 7 个地点(N=432;从 2017 年 1 月至 2017 年 9 月;最终随访,2018 年 3 月)进行了一项以行为激活原则为基础的、为期 6 周的 18 节、低强度的数字干预,由经过培训的护士助理提供智能手机,对 880 名患有临床显著抑郁症状(PHQ-9 评分≥10)的参与者进行分组随机对照试验(RCT),并对 440 名参与者进行强化常规护理(在巴西的 10 个组中各有 440 名参与者;在利马的 10 个组中各有 215 名参与者)。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是在 3 个月时 PHQ-9 评分至少降低 50%(范围为 0-27;得分越高表示抑郁程度越严重)。次要结果包括在 6 个月时 PHQ-9 评分至少降低 50%。

结果

在巴西的 880 名参与者中,有 807 名(91.7%)完成了至少 1 次随访评估,在秘鲁的 432 名参与者中,有 426 名(98.6%)完成了至少 1 次随访评估。在巴西的 391 名参与者中,数字干预组中有 40.7%(159 名)的 PHQ-9 评分至少降低了 50%,而增强常规护理组中有 28.6%(114 名)(差异为 12.1 个百分点[95%置信区间,5.5 到 18.7];调整后的优势比[OR],1.6[95%置信区间,1.2 到 2.2];P=0.001)。在利马,数字干预组中有 52.7%(108 名)的 PHQ-9 评分至少降低了 50%,而增强常规护理组中有 34.1%(70 名)(差异为 18.6 个百分点[95%置信区间,9.1 到 28.0];调整后的 OR,2.1[95%置信区间,1.4 到 3.2];P<0.001)。在 6 个月的随访中,组间差异不再具有统计学意义。

结论和相关性

在巴西和秘鲁的两项 RCT 中,患有高血压或糖尿病且伴有抑郁症状的患者接受为期 6 周的数字干预,与增强常规护理相比,在 3 个月时显著改善了抑郁症状。然而,在巴西的试验中,效果的幅度较小,且在 6 个月时没有持续。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02846662(圣保罗)和 NCT03026426(利马)。