• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2009 年至 2019 年期间,美国批准的口服化疗药物相关临床试验中癌症差异和非裔美国人代表性研究。

Cancer Disparities and Black American Representation in Clinical Trials Leading to the Approval of Oral Chemotherapy Drugs in the United States Between 2009 and 2019.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Health Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, TX.

Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 May;17(5):e623-e628. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.01108.

DOI:10.1200/OP.20.01108
PMID:33974825
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8120664/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Over the past 10 years, oral chemotherapy made up about half (45.6%) of all US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved oncolytic and hematologic medications. Given the disparity in incidence and mortality rate because of certain cancers among Black Americans (BAs) in the United States, a review of BA's representation in the clinical trials that lead to the development and FDA approval of oral chemotherapy drugs becomes imperative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reporting of race and inclusion of BA in clinical trials that led to the approval of oral chemotherapy medications by the FDA from 2009 to 2019 in the United States. Additionally, we evaluated the inclusion of BAs in clinical trials of three cancer types with the highest disparity rates among BAs (lung, breast, and prostate).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all FDA-approved oral chemotherapy drug from 2009-2019 was obtained using the FDA's Hematology/Oncology Approvals & Safety Notifications website. Reports of racial and demographics inclusion were obtained from the clinical trials registry.

RESULTS

Primary outcome: 142 clinical trials led to FDA approval of 81 oral chemotherapy agents between 2009 and 2019, among which 74 (52%) reported on at least one race and were included in our analysis. 35,933 participants were enrolled in these 74 clinical trials, among which 25,684 (71.47%), 6,061 (16.87%), 889 (2.47%), and 826 (2.30%) were White, Asian, Black, and Hispanic, respectively. BAs were also under-represented in the clinical trials of three cancer types with the highest disparity rates among this population.

CONCLUSION

BAs were under-represented in clinical trials leading to FDA approval of oral chemotherapy drugs. There should be more BAs in cancer clinical trials to increase the generalizability of the results, improve outcomes, and eventually close the health disparity gap among this patient population.

摘要

目的

在过去的 10 年中,口服化疗药物约占美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的肿瘤学和血液学药物的一半(45.6%)。鉴于美国黑人(BAs)中某些癌症的发病率和死亡率存在差异,因此有必要审查导致口服化疗药物开发和 FDA 批准的临床试验中 BA 的代表性。本研究的目的是评估从 2009 年到 2019 年,美国 FDA 批准的口服化疗药物临床试验中报告的种族情况以及 BA 的纳入情况。此外,我们还评估了 BA 纳入三种癌症类型临床试验的情况,这三种癌症类型的 BA 差异率最高(肺癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌)。

方法

使用 FDA 的血液学/肿瘤学批准和安全通知网站,回顾性检索 2009-2019 年所有获得 FDA 批准的口服化疗药物。从临床试验注册处获得种族和人口统计学纳入情况的报告。

结果

主要结果:在 2009 年至 2019 年期间,有 142 项临床试验导致 81 种口服化疗药物获得 FDA 批准,其中 74 种(52%)报告了至少一种种族,并纳入了我们的分析。这 74 项临床试验共纳入 35933 名参与者,其中白人、亚洲人、黑人和西班牙裔分别为 25684 名(71.47%)、6061 名(16.87%)、889 名(2.47%)和 826 名(2.30%)。BA 在这一人群中发病率和死亡率最高的三种癌症类型的临床试验中也代表性不足。

结论

BA 在导致 FDA 批准口服化疗药物的临床试验中代表性不足。应该有更多的 BA 参与癌症临床试验,以提高结果的普遍性,改善结果,并最终缩小这一患者群体的健康差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cb3/8120664/275747b511d5/op-17-e623-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cb3/8120664/3e3f8528de6a/op-17-e623-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cb3/8120664/275747b511d5/op-17-e623-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cb3/8120664/3e3f8528de6a/op-17-e623-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cb3/8120664/275747b511d5/op-17-e623-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cancer Disparities and Black American Representation in Clinical Trials Leading to the Approval of Oral Chemotherapy Drugs in the United States Between 2009 and 2019.2009 年至 2019 年期间,美国批准的口服化疗药物相关临床试验中癌症差异和非裔美国人代表性研究。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 May;17(5):e623-e628. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.01108.
2
The impact of the globalization of cancer clinical trials on the enrollment of Black patients.癌症临床试验全球化对黑种人患者入组的影响。
Cancer. 2021 Jul 1;127(13):2294-2301. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33463. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Assessment of gender representation in clinical trials leading to FDA approval for oncology therapeutics between 2014 and 2019: A systematic review-based cohort study.评估 2014 年至 2019 年间导致 FDA 批准肿瘤治疗药物的临床试验中的性别代表性:基于系统评价的队列研究。
Cancer. 2021 Sep 1;127(17):3156-3162. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33533. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
4
Race and Ethnicity Reporting and Enrollment Disparities in Clinical Trials Leading to FDA Approvals for Breast Cancer Between 2010 and 2020.种族和民族报告以及临床试验中的入组差异对 2010 至 2020 年间 FDA 批准的乳腺癌治疗药物的影响。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2023 Aug;23(6):591-597. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 10.
5
Diversity, equity, and inclusion in genitourinary clinical trials leading to FDA novel drug approval: An assessment of the FDA center for drug evaluation and research drug trials snapshot.泌尿生殖系统临床试验中与 FDA 新药批准相关的多样性、公平性和包容性:对 FDA 药品评价和研究中心药品试验快照的评估。
Curr Probl Cancer. 2023 Jun;47(3):100958. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.100958. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
6
Disparity of Race Reporting and Representation in Clinical Trials Leading to Cancer Drug Approvals From 2008 to 2018.2008年至2018年导致癌症药物获批的临床试验中种族报告与代表性的差异
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Oct 1;5(10):e191870. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1870. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
7
Despite The FDA's Five-Year Plan, Black Patients Remain Inadequately Represented In Clinical Trials For Drugs.尽管美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)制定了五年计划,但在药物临床试验中,黑人患者的代表性仍然不足。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Mar;41(3):368-374. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01432.
8
FDA Approvals of Oncology Drugs for Tissue-Agnostic Indications.FDA 批准用于组织不可知适应症的肿瘤药物。
Target Oncol. 2023 Sep;18(5):777-792. doi: 10.1007/s11523-023-00982-6. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
9
Cancer Drug Approvals That Displaced Existing Standard-of-Care Therapies, 2016-2021.2016-2021 年取代现有标准治疗药物的癌症治疗药物批准情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222265. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2265.
10
Enrollment of Black Participants in Pivotal Clinical Trials Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy for Hematological Malignant Neoplasms.支持美国食品和药物管理局批准嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法治疗血液恶性肿瘤的关键临床试验中纳入黑人参试者的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e228161. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8161.

引用本文的文献

1
Partnering With Faith Communities to Increase Knowledge of Precision Medicine and Genetic Research in the Black Community.与宗教团体合作,提高黑人社区对精准医学和基因研究的认识。
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251343247. doi: 10.1177/10732748251343247. Epub 2025 May 20.
2
The role of social, economic, and medical marginalization in cancer clinical trial participation inequities: A systematic review.社会、经济和医疗边缘化在癌症临床试验参与不平等中的作用:一项系统综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec 20;9(1):e25. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.677. eCollection 2025.
3
How to optimize and evaluate diversity in gynecologic cancer clinical trials: statements from the GCIG Barcelona Meeting.

本文引用的文献

1
Lessons learned for recruitment and retention of low-income African Americans.从招募和留住低收入非裔美国人中吸取的经验教训。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jan 22;17:100533. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100533. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Engaging African Americans in Research: The Recruiter's Perspective.招募者视角下的非裔美国人参与研究
Ethn Dis. 2017 Dec 7;27(4):453-462. doi: 10.18865/ed.27.4.453. eCollection 2017 Fall.
3
Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment in Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Cancer.癌症种族和少数民族患者临床试验入组的障碍
如何优化和评估妇科癌症临床试验中的多样性:GCIG 巴塞罗那会议声明。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Nov 4;34(11):1677-1684. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005982.
4
Association Between State Medicaid Policies and Accrual of Black or Hispanic Patients to Cancer Clinical Trials.州医疗补助政策与黑人和西班牙裔患者参与癌症临床试验的关联性。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Sep 20;42(27):3238-3246. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01149. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in European Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.欧洲乳腺癌临床试验中的种族和民族差异
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 29;16(9):1726. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091726.
6
Disparities in US Lung Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment.美国肺癌临床试验入组中的差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct;11(5):3201-3209. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01776-2. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
7
Breast Cancer Disparities and the COVID-19 Pandemic.乳腺癌差异与新冠疫情
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2022;14(4):192-198. doi: 10.1007/s12609-022-00458-y. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
8
Prostate cancer immunotherapy: a review of recent advancements with novel treatment methods and efficacy.前列腺癌免疫疗法:新型治疗方法及疗效的近期进展综述
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2022 Aug 15;10(4):210-233. eCollection 2022.
Cancer Control. 2016 Oct;23(4):327-337. doi: 10.1177/107327481602300404.
4
Acceptance of oral chemotherapy in breast cancer patients - a survey study.乳腺癌患者对口服化疗的接受度 - 一项调查研究。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Apr 12;11:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-129.
5
Cancer clinical trials accrual: missed opportunities to address disparities and missed opportunities to improve outcomes for all.癌症临床试验入组:解决差异方面错失的机会以及改善所有人治疗结果方面错失的机会。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jul;15(7):1818-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9869-2. Epub 2008 Apr 19.
6
Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review.招募代表性不足人群参与癌症临床试验的障碍:一项系统综述。
Cancer. 2008 Jan 15;112(2):228-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23157.