Suppr超能文献

美国肺癌临床试验入组中的差异。

Disparities in US Lung Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment.

机构信息

School of Arts and Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.

Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct;11(5):3201-3209. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01776-2. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disparities within clinical trial enrollment are well-documented, reducing the generalizability of results. Although nearly 30 years have passed since Congress passed the NIH Revitalization Act to encourage the participation of minoritized populations in clinical trials, these patients continue to be underrepresented. This study aimed to investigate lung cancer clinical trial enrollment disparities for race/ethnicity, sex, and age.

METHODS

We queried the National Institutes of Health: US National Library of Medicine database of clinical trials for all US-based lung cancer clinical trials completed between 2004 and 2021 and collected data on race and ethnicity, gender, and age breakdown. This data was compared to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database data. Independent sample t-tests and Kruskal-Wallis's approach were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Of 311 eligible trials with exclusive US enrollment, 136 (44%) reported race and ethnicity breakdown for the patient cohort representing 9869 patients. Hispanic, Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, Non-Hispanic Black, and Non-Hispanic Unreported participants were underrepresented (p = 0.001, p = 0.005, p = 0.014, p = 0.002, respectively). Non-Hispanic White participants were overrepresented (p = 0.018). Disparities worsened from 2017 to 2021 for Hispanic patients (p = 0.03). No significant differences were found for sex or age.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities for clinical lung cancer trial enrollment have not shown statistically significant improvement since 2004, and representation remains unequal, especially for racial and ethnic minorities.

摘要

背景

临床试验入组中的差异是有据可查的,这降低了研究结果的普遍性。尽管自国会通过《NIH 复兴法案》鼓励少数族裔人群参与临床试验以来,已经过去了近 30 年,但这些患者的参与率仍然较低。本研究旨在调查种族/族裔、性别和年龄与肺癌临床试验入组差异的关系。

方法

我们查询了美国国立卫生研究院(NIH):美国国家医学图书馆的临床试验数据库,该数据库收录了 2004 年至 2021 年间在美国完成的所有肺癌临床试验,并收集了种族和族裔、性别以及年龄分组的数据。这些数据与监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的数据进行了比较。采用独立样本 t 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 方法对数据进行分析。

结果

在 311 项符合条件的仅在美国开展的试验中,有 136 项(44%)报告了患者队列的种族和族裔分类,该队列代表了 9869 名患者。西班牙裔、非西班牙裔美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、非西班牙裔黑人以及非西班牙裔未报告参与者的代表性不足(p=0.001,p=0.005,p=0.014,p=0.002,分别)。非西班牙裔白人参与者的代表性过高(p=0.018)。从 2017 年到 2021 年,西班牙裔患者的差异有所恶化(p=0.03)。性别或年龄方面未发现显著差异。

结论

自 2004 年以来,肺癌临床试验入组的差异并未显示出统计学上的显著改善,代表性仍然不平等,特别是对于少数族裔。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验