Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.
Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant Local Health Integration Network, Hamilton, Canada.
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 11;21(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02248-0.
Chronic disease management models of care provide an opportunity to assist home care clients to manage their disease burden. However, pragmatic trial management practices and lessons learned from such models are poorly illustrated in the literature.
We describe the processes of implementing a community-based cardiorespiratory self-management model, known as DIVERT-CARE, across the home care programs of three health regions in Canada. The DIVERT-CARE model is a multi-component complex intervention that identifies home care clients at the highest risk of deterioration and provides them with resources and capacity to manage their conditions. We conducted a retrospective analysis of baseline participant characteristics, needs assessments, reviewed findings from site visits and a national workshop with study partners, and examined other study documentation.
Three home care regions in Canada participated in the study. A robust and data-driven review of each site was necessary to understand the local context, home care caseloads, structure of local systems, and intensity of resources, which influenced study processes. The creation of an intervention framework highlighted the need to adapt the intervention in a way that was sensitive to the local context while maintaining intervention outcomes.
Our detailed review showcases the relevant activities and on-the-ground steps needed to manage and conduct a multi-site pragmatic trial in home care. This example can help other researchers in implementing multi-disciplinary and multi-component care models for practice-based research.
慢性病管理护理模式为帮助居家护理客户管理其疾病负担提供了机会。然而,此类模式的实用试验管理实践和经验教训在文献中鲜有说明。
我们描述了在加拿大三个卫生区域的居家护理项目中实施基于社区的心肺自主管理模式(即 DIVERT-CARE)的过程。DIVER-CARE 模式是一种多组成部分的复杂干预措施,可识别病情恶化风险最高的居家护理客户,并为他们提供管理病情的资源和能力。我们对基线参与者特征、需求评估进行了回顾性分析,回顾了现场访问和与研究伙伴的全国研讨会的结果,并审查了其他研究文件。
加拿大三个居家护理区域参与了该研究。需要对每个地点进行强有力和数据驱动的审查,以了解当地情况、居家护理病例量、当地系统结构和资源强度,这些因素影响了研究进程。干预框架的创建强调需要以适应当地情况的方式调整干预措施,同时保持干预结果。
我们详细的审查展示了在居家护理中管理和进行多地点实用试验所需的相关活动和实地步骤。这个示例可以帮助其他研究人员实施多学科和多组成部分的护理模式,以进行基于实践的研究。