Satheesh Gautam, Dhurjati Rupasvi, Balagopalan Jayagopal Pathiyil, Mohanan Padinhare P, Salam Abdul
The George Institute for Global Health, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Department of Cardiology, Lakshmi Hospital, Palakkad, Kerala, India.
Indian Heart J. 2024 Jan-Feb;76(1):6-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.12.009. Epub 2024 Jan 1.
Hypertension is the leading risk factor for preventable cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality globally, with majority of the hypertension-attributed deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries like India. Several international and national clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide evidence-informed recommendations to achieve optimal control. CPGs produced by the World Health Organization, International Society for Hypertension, American (AHA/ACC-2017), and European (ESC/ESH-2018) are "major" as they are widely used and are highly cited. We compared the main recommendations for the pharmacological management of hypertension among the major CPGs and the two existing Indian CPGs for similarities and shortcomings. Several deviations from the major CPGs were observed among Indian CPGs. Important shortcomings pertain to Indian CPGs' low priority for initial combination therapy and the use of single pill combinations. Having multiple CPGs providing conflicting recommendations might discourage the adoption of evidence-based practices. There is a need for updating Indian CPGs based on up-to-date evidence.
高血压是全球可预防的心血管疾病和全因死亡的主要危险因素,大多数归因于高血压的死亡发生在印度等低收入和中等收入国家。一些国际和国家临床实践指南(CPG)提供了基于证据的建议,以实现最佳控制。世界卫生组织、国际高血压学会、美国(AHA/ACC - 2017)和欧洲(ESC/ESH - 2018)制定的CPG是“主要的”,因为它们被广泛使用且被大量引用。我们比较了主要CPG与两份现有的印度CPG中关于高血压药物治疗的主要建议,以找出异同和不足之处。在印度CPG中观察到了与主要CPG的一些偏差。重要的不足之处在于印度CPG对初始联合治疗的重视程度较低以及使用单片复方制剂。有多个CPG提供相互冲突的建议可能会阻碍循证实践的采用。有必要根据最新证据更新印度CPG。