Suppr超能文献

印度高血压管理临床实践指南与世界卫生组织、国际高血压学会、美国及欧洲指南的比较。

Comparison of Indian clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension with the World Health Organization, International Society of Hypertension, American, and European guidelines.

作者信息

Satheesh Gautam, Dhurjati Rupasvi, Balagopalan Jayagopal Pathiyil, Mohanan Padinhare P, Salam Abdul

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Department of Cardiology, Lakshmi Hospital, Palakkad, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Indian Heart J. 2024 Jan-Feb;76(1):6-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.12.009. Epub 2024 Jan 1.

Abstract

Hypertension is the leading risk factor for preventable cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality globally, with majority of the hypertension-attributed deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries like India. Several international and national clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide evidence-informed recommendations to achieve optimal control. CPGs produced by the World Health Organization, International Society for Hypertension, American (AHA/ACC-2017), and European (ESC/ESH-2018) are "major" as they are widely used and are highly cited. We compared the main recommendations for the pharmacological management of hypertension among the major CPGs and the two existing Indian CPGs for similarities and shortcomings. Several deviations from the major CPGs were observed among Indian CPGs. Important shortcomings pertain to Indian CPGs' low priority for initial combination therapy and the use of single pill combinations. Having multiple CPGs providing conflicting recommendations might discourage the adoption of evidence-based practices. There is a need for updating Indian CPGs based on up-to-date evidence.

摘要

高血压是全球可预防的心血管疾病和全因死亡的主要危险因素,大多数归因于高血压的死亡发生在印度等低收入和中等收入国家。一些国际和国家临床实践指南(CPG)提供了基于证据的建议,以实现最佳控制。世界卫生组织、国际高血压学会、美国(AHA/ACC - 2017)和欧洲(ESC/ESH - 2018)制定的CPG是“主要的”,因为它们被广泛使用且被大量引用。我们比较了主要CPG与两份现有的印度CPG中关于高血压药物治疗的主要建议,以找出异同和不足之处。在印度CPG中观察到了与主要CPG的一些偏差。重要的不足之处在于印度CPG对初始联合治疗的重视程度较低以及使用单片复方制剂。有多个CPG提供相互冲突的建议可能会阻碍循证实践的采用。有必要根据最新证据更新印度CPG。

相似文献

3
ACC/AHA Versus ESC/ESH on Hypertension Guidelines: JACC Guideline Comparison.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 18;73(23):3018-3026. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.507.
5
A systematic review of recent clinical practice guidelines on the diagnosis, assessment and management of hypertension.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053744. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
6
Management of Arterial Hypertension: 2018 ACC/AHA Versus ESC Guidelines and Perioperative Implications.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Dec;33(12):3496-3503. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.068. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
8
Variation in hypertension clinical practice guidelines: a global comparison.
BMC Med. 2021 May 12;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01963-0.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in hypertension clinical practice guidelines: a global comparison.
BMC Med. 2021 May 12;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01963-0.
3
Indian guidelines on hypertension-IV (2019).
J Hum Hypertens. 2020 Nov;34(11):745-758. doi: 10.1038/s41371-020-0349-x. Epub 2020 May 19.
4
2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines.
Hypertension. 2020 Jun;75(6):1334-1357. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026. Epub 2020 May 6.
5
The global epidemiology of hypertension.
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 Apr;16(4):223-237. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0244-2. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
7
European and American hypertension guidelines and goal blood pressure: Relevance to India.
Indian Heart J. 2018 Jul-Aug;70(4):465-468. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
8
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
10
Cardiovascular Diseases in India: Current Epidemiology and Future Directions.
Circulation. 2016 Apr 19;133(16):1605-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008729.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验