Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Rm.106, Bldg.6, No.38 Xueyuan Rd., Haidian Dist, Beijing, China.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 11;21(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06472-7.
County hospitals as the backbone of the China's healthcare system are providing services for over 70% of the total population. However, the hospital management practice (HMP) and its links with quality of care, efficiency and finance in these hospitals are unknown.
We did two cross-sectional surveys of HMP in 2013 and 2015 among 101 county hospitals across rural China. Three managing roles (hospital director, director of medical affairs office and director of cardiology) and a cardiologist were invited to the surveys. A novel HMP rating scale, with 100 as full score, was used to measure the HMP in 17 indicators under four dimensions (target, operation, performance, and talent management) for each hospital. We analyzed the association of HMP score with variables on quality of care, efficiency and finance using linear mixed models with and without adjustment for potential confounders.
A total of 95 hospitals participated in at least one survey and were included in the analysis. The overall mean HMP score varied dramatically across the hospitals and 84% of them scored less than 60. The dimension mean HMP score was 38.6 (target), 56.4 (operation), 53.2 (performance) and 55.7 (talent), respectively. The pattern of indicator mean HMP score, however, was almost identical between hospitals with high and low overall HMP score, showing the same 'strength' (staff satisfaction, staff performance appraisal, 'hard wares', patient-centered services, etc.) and 'weakness' (target balance, target setting, continuous quality improvement, penalties on staff with dissatisfied performance, etc.). The associations of overall mean HMP score with quality of care and efficiency variables and cost per hospitalization was not statistically significant. The statistical significance in the association with hospital annual total income disappeared after adjusting for region, teaching status, number of competitors, number of staff and number of beds in use.
The HMP in Chinese county hospitals scores low in general and was not significantly associated with hospital care quality, efficiency and finance. The current healthcare reform in China should address the micro level issues in hospital management practices.
县医院作为中国医疗体系的骨干,为全国 70%以上的人口提供服务。然而,这些医院的医院管理实践(HMP)及其与医疗质量、效率和财务的关系尚不清楚。
我们于 2013 年和 2015 年在全国农村的 101 家县医院进行了两次 HMP 横断面调查。邀请了三位管理角色(院长、医务处处长和心内科主任)和一位心内科医生参加调查。使用一种新的 HMP 评分量表,总分为 100 分,用于测量每家医院四个维度(目标、运营、绩效和人才管理)下 17 个指标的 HMP。我们使用线性混合模型分析了 HMP 评分与医疗质量、效率和财务变量之间的关联,并在有无潜在混杂因素的情况下进行了调整。
共有 95 家医院参加了至少一次调查,并纳入了分析。医院之间的总体 HMP 评分差异很大,84%的医院得分低于 60 分。维度平均 HMP 评分为 38.6(目标)、56.4(运营)、53.2(绩效)和 55.7(人才)。然而,高总体 HMP 评分和低总体 HMP 评分医院的指标平均 HMP 评分模式几乎相同,表现出相同的“优势”(员工满意度、员工绩效评估、“硬件”、以患者为中心的服务等)和“劣势”(目标平衡、目标设定、持续质量改进、对表现不满意的员工进行处罚等)。总体 HMP 评分与医疗质量和效率变量以及住院费用的关联没有统计学意义。调整地区、教学状态、竞争对手数量、员工数量和使用床位数量后,与医院年总收入的关联不再具有统计学意义。
中国县级医院的 HMP 总体得分较低,与医院的医疗质量、效率和财务状况没有显著关系。中国当前的医疗改革应解决医院管理实践中的微观问题。